search for: pf4public

On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 19:21:10 +0300 PF4Public <PF4Public at mail.ru> wrote: > Given the config provided as requested, any clues? > The smb.conf you posted, shows that Samba is running as a standalone server. This means that any Samba users will also need to exist on the windows machine (with the same password). Perhaps this is y...

...able = yes write list = root [acltest] path = /acltest read only = no vfs objects = acl_xattr map acl inherit = yes store dos attributes = yes ... aand the rest of the shares ... 22.03.2017 20:10, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:20:57 +0300 > PF4Public via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> "uname -a" gives Linux 4.9.0-1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.2-2 >> (2017-01-12) x86_64 GNU/Linux >> >> "samba -V" : Version 4.5.6-Debian >> >> It is a standalone server with "security =...

On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 21:29:19 +0300 PF4Public via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi, Rowland, thanks for your reply. > > Neither of machines have samba users as their local users. This makes > Windows ask for username and password upon connection, I suppose. > However I'm not determined on what's the d...

...> And based on what you already posted below. > Im guessing an AD DC setup, but with the wrong backend setup. > But you tell us.. > > > Greetz, > > Louis > > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens PF4Public via >> samba >> Verzonden: woensdag 22 maart 2017 16:12 >> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba shared folders and windows 7 permissions >> dialog. >> >> Was my wording bad or something? >> >> >> 20.03.2017 20:11,...

Given the config provided as requested, any clues? TIA 23.03.2017 20:26, PF4Public via samba wrote: > Here is the requested config: > > [global] > workgroup = workgroup > netbios name = server > server string = %h server > wins support = yes > dns proxy = no > name resolve order = host wins lmhosts bcast > interfaces = 127...

PF4Public via samba wrote: > It is indeed an issue with Windows, rather than Samba, and I never > stated otherwise. ---- BTW, the means(or method) used to set the account enumeration permissions on a samba server isn't a windows issue, AFAIK.... ;-) > > Is it "0: SAMR_DOMAIN_ACCESS...

Hi there Trying to solve an issue with samba and windows 7 permissions dialog. Problem is that sometimes windows 7 permissions dialog is lacking ldap users and groups. Looks like my problem is related to this one: https://forums.freenas.org/index.php?threads/users-and-groups-not-showing-up-in-windows-7.46023/ Sadly there is no solution in that thread. Consider the following setup: linux debian

...4 PDC server Standalone server? Member server? And based on what you already posted below. Im guessing an AD DC setup, but with the wrong backend setup. But you tell us.. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens PF4Public via > samba > Verzonden: woensdag 22 maart 2017 16:12 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba shared folders and windows 7 permissions > dialog. > > Was my wording bad or something? > > > 20.03.2017 20:11, PF4Public wrote: > > Hi there &...

On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 19:20:57 +0300 PF4Public via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > "uname -a" gives Linux 4.9.0-1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.2-2 > (2017-01-12) x86_64 GNU/Linux > > "samba -V" : Version 4.5.6-Debian > > It is a standalone server with "security = user" and "pass...

...st from enumerating ldap users and groups? If that's true, then why is that happening to the same user on a different hosts? What is the origin of struct samr_OpenDomain and how does samba derive it? 26.03.2017 21:45, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 21:29:19 +0300 > PF4Public via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, Rowland, thanks for your reply. >> >> Neither of machines have samba users as their local users. This makes >> Windows ask for username and password upon connection, I suppose. >> However I'm not determi...