Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "pewriter".
Did you mean:
rewriter
2008 May 13
3
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM
...censing problems -- it is worth
noting that LLVM and MinGW are under different (and possibly
incompatible) licenses.
If your suggestion does amount to me starting a
"Micro-MinGW" fork of MinGW, then I would think my efforts
would be better directed at helping to finish/implement the
PEWriter, ELFWriter, MachOWriter in LLVM, and then that work
would be under the LLVM license.
>> But if MinGW or Cygwin is installed, then I have no need
>> for LLVM !!
> This is not the case. Having MinGW/Cygwin installed !=
> having GCC installed.
Quoting Wikipedia: "MinGW [....
2008 May 11
8
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM
Chris Lattner wrote:
> If you'd prefer to use GCC, go for it. No one is forcing
> you to use LLVM.
No, we would prefer to use LLVM, but a missing part in LLVM
makes it difficult. It would be wonderful if this missing
part could be supplied.
> You are seriously ignorant of what LLVM is all about.
> Please go inform yourself.
Alright, I read some more on llvm.org and it
2008 May 13
9
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM
...code at time
of installation".
Nick Lewycky wrote:
> Although we can emit the opcodes in binary form, support
> for the container formats isn't working properly. Thus
> far, there's an unfinished ELFWriter and MachOWriter in
> lib/Codegen/. Those could be finished, and PEWriter could
> be added for Win32 support.
It would be wonderful if support for the 3 container formats
could be finished/implemented. It would make LLVM far more
appealing for use in real-world situations.
> If this is blocking you from using LLVM,
Yes, it is.
> please consider whether i...