search for: pewrit

...censing problems -- it is worth noting that LLVM and MinGW are under different (and possibly incompatible) licenses. If your suggestion does amount to me starting a "Micro-MinGW" fork of MinGW, then I would think my efforts would be better directed at helping to finish/implement the PEWriter, ELFWriter, MachOWriter in LLVM, and then that work would be under the LLVM license. >> But if MinGW or Cygwin is installed, then I have no need >> for LLVM !! > This is not the case. Having MinGW/Cygwin installed != > having GCC installed. Quoting Wikipedia: "MinGW...

Chris Lattner wrote: > If you'd prefer to use GCC, go for it. No one is forcing > you to use LLVM. No, we would prefer to use LLVM, but a missing part in LLVM makes it difficult. It would be wonderful if this missing part could be supplied. > You are seriously ignorant of what LLVM is all about. > Please go inform yourself. Alright, I read some more on llvm.org and it

...code at time of installation". Nick Lewycky wrote: > Although we can emit the opcodes in binary form, support > for the container formats isn't working properly. Thus > far, there's an unfinished ELFWriter and MachOWriter in > lib/Codegen/. Those could be finished, and PEWriter could > be added for Win32 support. It would be wonderful if support for the 3 container formats could be finished/implemented. It would make LLVM far more appealing for use in real-world situations. > If this is blocking you from using LLVM, Yes, it is. > please consider whether...