search for: pets

I''m new to rails and ruby, and after trying to get this to work correctly for hours, I thought I''d give this forum an try. I''ve setup a trivial project just to mess around with Rails database naming conventions and associations. I''ve got a table called Pets, and a table called Types. Pets contains a list of pets, Parky the cat, Daisy the dog, etc, And Types contains a list of different pet types, dog - cat - fish - bird - etc. Pets table CREATE TABLE `pets` ( `id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, `name` varchar(20) default NULL, `pet_id` int(...

Hm. I may misunderstand, but I'm not sure that's an improvement over the problem you're trying to solve. How about something like this? (Please forgive any accent; I don't speak snake fluently.) class Pet(object): @staticmethod def new(): # Create a 'free' pet. It can later become owned, but not to more than one owner. return

I am working on writing a search method where a user can type a string of words and I return all the objects that have fields that match all of the words in one or a combination of fields. Person first_name last_name Pet name Person has_many :pets I want to write some SQL so that if I search for "Tony AAAA" I will get all the people who have Tony and AAA either in their first_name or last_name fields or in any of their pet''s name fields. For example, it would be ok to return a person if their first_name is Tony and th...

Hey all, I''m using a simple search function. It''s working great except for foreign keys. I have one table pets (id,name,owner_id) and another table people(id,name) owner_id being a foreign key of pet pointing to people name. here it is on the pet controller: @paginator, @pets= paginate(:pets, :conditions =>["name OR owner_id like ?","%"+params[:filter]+"%"], :include =>p...

Is there a way to set the base class to abstract? or otherwise enforce that no one can create a "Pet"? Pet < ActiveRecord Dog < Pet Pig < Pet I''ve tried: class Pet < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presence_of :type end but I get an error about ../vendor/rails/activerecord/lib/active_record/validations.rb:74: warning: Object#type is deprecated; use Object#class

gledaj online filmove potpuno besplatno... http://pet.prevodim.com/interspire/link.php?M=181705&N=11&L=8&F=T ** ?ta je potrebno za gledanje filmova preko interneta (http://pet.prevodim.com/interspire/link.php?M=181705&N=11&L=8&F=T) ------------------------------------------------------------ Da biste gledali filmi?e preko weba trebate imati dobar internet

...quot;house4","house4") pet<-c("dogs","cats","dogs","dogs","budgie","cat","hamster") d.f<-data.frame(house,pet,count) How would I acheive a dataframe that had every instance of house in column 1, all possible pets in column 2 and counts in column 3 like this... newhouse<-rep(unique(house),1,each=4) newpets<-rep(unique(pet),4) newcount<-c(2,1,0,0,2,0,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,3,2,4) newdf<-data.frame(newhouse,newpets,newcount) Is there a way of doing this without creating a new matrix and using programming...

hi, recently i discovered the functionability summary.formula, awesome! from the help page i understand that method=reverse allows to summarize all variables on the right hand side of formula (the help page on line 229 wrongly refers to the left? hand side variables) in categories which are determined by a single left hand side variable. my problem is that the argument fun seems not to be

On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Gordon Henriksen <gordonhenriksen at mac.com> wrote: > On 2008-05-13, at 02:12, Mahadevan R wrote: > > >>> That's not how the object works... > > > > Gordon, I think I can make it work if we have the following additional > > function in LLVM-C: > > > > LLVMModuleRef LLVMGetModule(LLVMModuleProviderRef

On 2008-05-13, at 02:12, Mahadevan R wrote: >>> That's not how the object works... > > Gordon, I think I can make it work if we have the following additional > function in LLVM-C: > > LLVMModuleRef LLVMGetModule(LLVMModuleProviderRef MP) { > return wrap(unwrap(MP)->getModule()); > } Can I ask, how general is your solution? I only intended to use this

I am using the drop shadow technique described at http://www.1976design.com/blog/archive/2003/11/14/shadows/ to give several of my divs drop shadows. That part works fine. What doesn''t work so well is when I try to BlindDown a div in Firefox and it ends up ignoring the content below it and just overlapping it. In IE this problem does not occur. In Firefox the overlapping does

Dear very helpful friends, It is Sunday, there is no air traffic in Europe, what better to do than try and learn me some more R. I have the following example: owner <- c(1:4) animal <- c("cat", "dog", "cat", "dog") char.1 <- c("fluffy", "playful", "mean", "stupid") food <- c("cat food",

hi railers, I have a model/view/controller with many associations (20+). I would like to display the relative associations using AJAX, allowing the user to display the association his/her is interesting at a particular time. Is here any kind ajax tabs helper or some kind of tab widgets that I can easily incorporate into my rails application. regards, leon -------------- next part --------------

I was having some odd results when working with acts_as_ferret (current trunk), so I decided to test with the current version of ferret to see if I encountered the same problem. I did. Here are the details: installed ferret 0.10.10 on debian sarge with ''sudo gem install ferret'' (btw, same results on OSX) opened up an irb session: irb(main):001:0> require

...ed of just by skipping the ''-w'' flag on the shebang line. The two tables I have are: CREATE TABLE `people` ( `id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, `name` varchar(20) NOT NULL default ''"'', PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) TYPE=MyISAM; CREATE TABLE `pets` ( `id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, `name` varchar(20) default NULL, `kind` varchar(30) default NULL, `person_id` int(11) default NULL, PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) TYPE=MyISAM; The error is caused by the following: class Person < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :pets...

Hello, R friends, I'm trying to crack this nut: Example Data. pet    gender dog    male dog    female dog    male cat    female cat    female cat    male Plot Task. Horizontal 100% bars where y axis shows gender factor (male vs. female) and x axis shows percentage of kind of pets (dog vs. cat) so that % dogs + % cats are stacked in 1 bar and sum up to 100% (for each gender group 1 bar). How can this be done with ggplot2? Thanks for any comments! Mario [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hello guys: I'm running two Zentyal servers with Samba 4.1.17 on each one. We're experiencing some problems such as: - When a user changes his password, it is not replicated the change on secondary DC. - Some Windows machines have reported trust relationship broken. On DC1 I run this: params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/etc/samba/shares.conf" ldb_wrap open

...there is such a thing as an updateClass, in order to change a "contains" option, please? that is, if I had setClass("dog", representation(name="character",paws="numeric",tail="character")) Fair enough. Later I want to have a class called "pets". setClass("pets",representation(name="character",total="numeric")) I want dog to be a subclass of pets. Do I put in the setClass command as it stands with the additional contains="pets", or is there an update form to use, please? Hope this makes sen...

Um. Unfortunately in this case, Python will not collect an instance of Pet which owned by an Owner, because both objects in the reference cycle have finalizers (__del__). Python will just add both objects to a garbage list (and will not call any of the finalizers). It does this because it cannot guess which finalizer to call first. But I get your point though, and will try to work this into the

On May 13, 2008, at 07:31, Mahadevan R wrote: > Um. Unfortunately in this case, Python will not collect an instance > of Pet which owned by an Owner, because both objects in the > reference cycle have finalizers (__del__). Python will just add both > objects to a garbage list (and will not call any of the finalizers). Actually, there's no reference cycle, which is what I