search for: petrom

...s a patch that adds a new parameter named 'restrict anonymous' to samba. When set to 'true' or 'yes', the %U macro > expansion works in a more predictable manner. > > Andy. > > > Date: Fri, 02 Apr 1999 09:06:17 +0300 > > From: iordache <iordache@petrom.ro> > > Subject: include = %what? > > > > Hi ! > > Let's assume we want to let users to see only certain shares. A simple > > way to do this would be to put a line like this in smb.conf: > > > > include = smb.conf.%u ;from "man smb.conf...

...ripts. > by awesome-dave1@juno.com > 10) Setting 'system' attribute on folders > by Ryk Field <r.field@mailbox.uq.edu.au> > 11) Messages with smbclient... > by BRUNET Franck <franck.brunet@free.fr> > 12) resource sharing > by Alex <iordache@petrom.ro> > 13) URGENT: WIN2K INVALID VOLUMENAME > by "Oliver Rehmann" <oliver_rehmann@compuserve.com> > 14) Printer shares question > by "Jonathan Bayer" <a8targazer@bayerfamily.net> > 15) w2K with Samba > by "Nick Dolan" <nic...

How do i unsubscribe??

RH5.1 : How can be made a share _browseable_ ONLY by a certain group - something like Netware shares ?

Hi all ! Before to upgrate my Samba version (1.9.. - 2.0.3 , RH 2.0.36) every user connected to the Samba server get a different list of shares, based on the "include = smb.conf.%U" line in smb.conf/[Global] . I understood that I can't use %u in "include" parameter, but I've got my work done with %U until... :( What should I do to solve this ?

Hi ! Let's assume we want to let users to see only certain shares. A simple way to do this would be to put a line like this in smb.conf: include = smb.conf.%u ;from "man smb.conf", include section: "It takes ;standards substitution, except %u, %S, %P" So, another ways can be: include = smb.conf.%U or include = %H/smb.conf

I want to know more about a problem the Samba developers solved it long time ago. It's about what's going on (in detail) when a NT or W95 user clicks a network neibourhood computer, in a TCP/IP only network, from the other's computer point of view.Someone told me to examine the receiving buffer, but I think that if this is the only solution, someone before me did that already and maybe

Most of you will probably think about this "It's not a real problem". But not my boss. I want to exchange our Netware server with a linux/SMABA one but my boss wants to have on the new server exactly the same directories structure like in the Netware server. And here it is what I couldn't done : user X wich have two secondary groups Y and Z must browse in Win95 _only_ the Y and