search for: peto

...packages/survminer/vignettes/Specifiying_weights_in_log-rank_comparisons.html), Fleming-Harrington weighted log-rank test should have 2 parameters "p" and "q" to control the weighting for earlier vs later times in the follow-up. For example, setting rho=1 in survdiff() uses the Peto-Peto modification of Gehan-Wilcox weights, which I can confirm by setting p=1 & 1=0 in comp() from survminer package. similarly rho=0 is equivalent to p=0 & q=0 I am interested in putting more weights on survival difference in later follow-up time. According to comp() from survminer packag...

...- > From: Hal Finkel [mailto:hfinkel at anl.gov] > Sent: den 13 juli 2017 16:01 > To: Björn Pettersson A <bjorn.a.pettersson at ericsson.com>; David Chisnall > <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk>; Dylan McKay <me at dylanmckay.io> > Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; Carl Peto <carl.peto at me.com> > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: Harvard architectures and default address > spaces > > On 07/13/2017 05:38 AM, Björn Pettersson A via llvm-dev wrote: > > My experience of having the address space for functions (or function > pointers) in the DataLayo...

...urvminer/vignettes/Specifiying_weights_in_log-rank_comparisons.html), Fleming-Harrington weighted log-rank test should have 2 parameters "p" and "q" to control the weighting for earlier vs later times in the follow-up. > > For example, setting rho=1 in survdiff() uses the Peto-Peto modification of Gehan-Wilcox weights, which I can confirm by setting p=1 & 1=0 in comp() from survminer package. similarly rho=0 is equivalent to p=0 & q=0 > > I am interested in putting more weights on survival difference in later follow-up time. According to comp() from survmi...

...ution. /Björn > -----Original Message----- > From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of David > Chisnall via llvm-dev > Sent: den 12 juli 2017 17:26 > To: Dylan McKay <me at dylanmckay.io> > Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; Carl Peto <carl.peto at me.com> > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: Harvard architectures and default address > spaces > > On 11 Jul 2017, at 23:18, Dylan McKay via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > wrote: > > > > > Add this information to DataLayout and to use tha...

.../vignettes/Specifiying_weights_in_log-rank_comparisons.html), Fleming-Harrington weighted log-rank test should have 2 parameters "p" and "q" to control the weighting for earlier vs later times in the follow-up. >> >> For example, setting rho=1 in survdiff() uses the Peto-Peto modification of Gehan-Wilcox weights, which I can confirm by setting p=1 & 1=0 in comp() from survminer package. similarly rho=0 is equivalent to p=0 & q=0 >> >> I am interested in putting more weights on survival difference in later follow-up time. According to comp() fro...

...rl > On 21 May 2020, at 21:13, Eli Friedman via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > See the description of "P<address space>" at http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#langref-datalayout . > > -Eli > > -----Original Message----- > From: Carl Peto <carl.peto at me.com> > Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 1:11 PM > To: Eli Friedman <efriedma at quicinc.com> > Cc: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Subject: [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] Updated llc does not compile my .ll files any more [addrspace on AVR problem?] > &g...

...’s valid to set them in any order. If there’s no way to get FileCheck to recognise this, the test should probably be weakened or it will keep breaking I guess? Carl > On 8 Mar 2019, at 07:13, Roman Lebedev <lebedev.ri at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 1:45 AM Carl Peto via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> We have a test that looks like this… >> >> define void @array16_store() { >> ; CHECK-LABEL: array16_store: >> >> ; CHECK: ldi [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], 204 >> ; CHECK: ldi [[REG2:r[0-9]+]],...

...ow available via CRAN, called metafor. The metafor package consists of a collection of functions for conducting meta-analyses in R. Fixed- and random-effects models (with and without moderators) can be fitted via the general linear (mixed-effects) model. For 2x2 table data, the Mantel-Haenszel and Peto's method are also implemented. The package also provides various plot functions (for example, for forest, funnel, and radial plots) and functions for assessing the model fit and obtaining case diagnostics. Best, -- Wolfgang Viechtbauer Department of Methodology and Statistics University of...

...eed to tell the frontend you're actually compiling for AVR. (For clang, you'd use the "-target" flag; not sure what the equivalent is for Swift.) > > -Eli > > -----Original Message----- > From: llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> On Behalf Of Carl Peto via llvm-dev > Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 10:18 AM > To: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Subject: [EXT] [llvm-dev] Updated llc does not compile my .ll files any more [addrspace on AVR problem?] > > Hi, > > I’ve come back and updated my llvm toolset with modern...

We have a test that looks like this… define void @array16_store() { ; CHECK-LABEL: array16_store: ; CHECK: ldi [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], 204 ; CHECK: ldi [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], 170 ; CHECK: sts int.array+3, [[REG2]] ; CHECK: sts int.array+2, [[REG1]] ; CHECK: ldi [[REG1:r[0-9]+]], 187 ; CHECK: ldi [[REG2:r[0-9]+]], 170 ; CHECK: sts int.array+1, [[REG2]] ; CHECK: sts int.array, [[REG1]] ; CHECK: ldi

Hello, I'm using dovecot as a mail relay so that I can back up my providers IMAP mail locally. I'm impressed how easy this was to set up, but I'm having a quirk that I would like help with, if possible. There are many weak links in my set-up chain, if you will, but I think I've narrowed the problem. I'll describe my set-up anyway. I'm running dovecot 1.1.4 on ubuntu

Hi, I am running a server that does regular builds using llc. To begin with I was doing a fork/exec to launch llc, passing the files to compile and other switches as command line, etc. then waiting for the subprocess to complete. This was fine but seemed an unnecessary overhead. After all llc is mostly a fairly thin front end over the llc libraries, which do the actual work right? So I took

...up setting options multiple times, which could lead to unexpected behaviour. Note that the comment in this function says that it is explicitly intended to allow parsing different command lines multiple times. > > Hope that helps. > > James > > On Sun, 17 Nov 2019 at 15:17, Carl Peto via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > Hi, > > I am running a server that does regular builds using llc. To begin with I was doing a fork/exec to launch llc, passing the files to compile and other switches as command line, etc. t...

Hello Hal, > Add this information to DataLayout and to use that information in relevant places. This sounds like a much better/cleaner idea, thanks! On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 1:13 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > On 07/11/2017 12:54 AM, Dylan McKay via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hello all, I’m looking into solving an AVR-specific issue and would love > to hear

Is it possible to calculate Kaplan-Meier for left-truncated, right-censored data using survival5? -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at

Dear all, We are trying to do a meta regression in R using the lme function. The reason for doing this with lme function is that we have covariates and studies within references. In S-Plus this is possible by using the following command: lme(outcome ~ covars, random = ~1 | reference/study, weights = varFixed(~var.outcome), data = mydata, control = lmeControl(sigma = 1)) This means that the

Hi, If I have: foo <- survfit(y ~ x) where y is a survival object and x is a n-level factor. The documentation says when I plot(foo), the confidence intervals will not be plotted (which I guess is understandable as otherwise the plot will get really messy). I tried to plot with confidence intervals by using: plot(foo, conf.int = TRUE) and indeed the resulting plot is messy. However

Hello everybody. First of all, I would like to present myself. I'm a french student in public health and I like statistics though I'm not that good in mathematics (but I try to catch up). I've discovered R recently while trying to find a statistical program in order to avoid rebooting my computer under windows when I need to do some statistical work. And here is my first question.

Hi, I’ve come back and updated my llvm toolset with modern code (my branch was about 1-2 years old) and now the llvm IR files produced by my front end no longer compile with llc. Here is a sample of llvm ir produced by my front end (it’s a standard version 3.1 build of swift from the swift.org open source website). ; ModuleID = 'main.ll' source_filename = "main.ll" target