search for: peter_marklund

...But that seems sort of clumsy and I would have thought that there was a rake task for it. Have I overlooked something? Thanks! Peter ---------------------------- Peter Marklund Garvar Lundins Gr?nd 7 11220 Stockholm Sweden Mobile Phone: +46-(0)70-4164857 Home Phone: +46-(0)8-50091315 Skype: peter_marklund IM: AIM - petermarklund, MSN - peter_marklund at hotmail.com, Yahoo - peter_marklund2002 http://marklunds.com ----------------------------

...cription="should_have_emailed", @options={}> Is this itentional behaviour by RSpec or some weird side effect? Cheers Peter ---------------------------- Peter Marklund Garvar Lundins Gr?nd 7 11220 Stockholm Sweden Mobile Phone: +46-(0)70-4164857 Home Phone: +46-(0)8-50091315 Skype: peter_marklund IM: AIM - petermarklund, MSN - peter_marklund at hotmail.com, Yahoo - peter_marklund2002 http://marklunds.com ----------------------------

Hi! I would really like to find a way to allow me to write RSpec specifications for code that use database transactions. I know I can set config.use_transactional_fixtures = false in my spec_helper.rb. That works, and that''s great, but it will (I think) slow down my specs quite a bit. I would like to turn off transactional fixtures for just a single spec (describe), or even

I saw in one of Dave C.''s comments to a ticket that "our current plan is to deprecate the mocking framework." I hadn''t heard anything about that, but then again I haven''t paid super close attention to the list. Are we planning on dumping the mock framework in favor of using Mocha (or any other framework one might want to plug in?). Pat

hypothetical question for all you BDD experts: I want to make sure that a :list action always returns widgets in alphabetical order. There''s at least 2 ways of doing this: it "should fetch items in alphabetical order" do Widget.should_receive(:find).with(:order => "name ASC") get :list end it "should fetch items in alphabetical order" do [:red,