search for: petefrench

Hello! > Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:53:18 +0100 > From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@FreeBSD.org> > > > freshly updated ports tree on a 4.9 box is exactly the same as a > > > freshly updated ports tree on a 5.2 box. > >=20 > > Read the users email. They're using specific tags, not "." so there are > > (or may be) some

I have a zpool that consists for a two-drive mirror. The two times I took the zpool offline, I had to resilver one of the drives (the same drive both times) when I imported it back. All drives in the pool show no read, write, or checksum errors and are new, so I'm looking to a software problem before hardware. Both drives are encrypted geli devices. I tried to reproduce the error with 1GB

So, I have a farm of machines runnign 7.1/amd64, all of which have 16 gig of memory in them. This afternoon, as an experiment, I altered loader.conf to have these two lines in it: vm.kmem_size="1536M" vm.kmem_size_max="1536M" This is what I do on machines running ZFS - these machines are not, however running ZFS, and do not have the zfs module loaded. I just wanted to see if

With FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE, I'm finding significant packet loss (sometimes 85%). If I insert an Intel nic (fxp), there is nil packet loss with similar tests (ping -c 100). re0: <RealTek 8168/8111B PCIe Gigabit Ethernet> port 0xc800-0xc8ff mem 0xf9fff000-0xf9ffffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci1 I have seen a thread on current mentioning similar problems:

I've got three installations of FreeBSD using 6to4 in three different physical locations, attached to three different ISPs. Sometime in the last few days all of them have stopped talking to IPv6 addesse which are not also 6to4. I can still talk to 2002: addresses, but not to 2001: addresses. This all worked fine a few days ago, and nothing has changed in the config of any of these machines. I

well, I tried to narrow this down a bit by removing lagg from the equation, but the switch requires LACP to be active on those ports so I can't test in isolation unfortunately. Is anyone running 7.2 on a DL360 G5 with working ether ? -pete.

I admit I was scepticle of this suggestion - but it actually seems to have worked. COmpiling a straight GENERIC kernel with KDB and DDB included do seem to have made my irq22 interrupt storms go away. Certainly I have spent some time trying to provoke the problem and not managed to make it read it's ugly head again. The thing is though, this doen't make me particularly happy - as I am

About an hour ago I started getting regular messages from cron running /usr/libexec/save-entropy which contail the single line "IPv4: not found" Anybody got any ideas ? The only thing I did at that porint was to do an 'rm' of /usr/obj in preparation for compiling this mornings 61 code to test it. Removing /usr/obj should not affect a running system at all. The box is currently

I have an MSI K8D Master, wth an Opteron 242 installed, on which I have been happily running 6.0-RELEASE. I did have one problem wuth the board, which was that if I had ACPI enabled then the operating system would not boot, it froze at the point where it waited for the SCSI devices to settle. I got round this by disabling ACPI in loader.conf and it works fine. A couple of days ago I installed a

I just started rolling out 9.2 to all our production machnes, which are currently on 8.4. We have tested it pretty throughly internally and are very happy with it, but as part of the deployment have hit a problem. We have a pair of boxes running as a firewall using carp and pfsync. One of the - the 'passive' one - has been upgraded to 9.2, and all works fine as far as carp si concerned,