search for: petaramesh

...t losing all my snapshots or doubling the size of data on disk)...? I already had made the move back from BTRFS to ext4 about 18 months ago, I found it had improved so was back to BTRFS, and I wouldn''t have to revert back again :-/ Any advice or help greatly appreciated. TIA. -- Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@petaramesh.org> http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E Ne cherchez pas : Je ne suis pas sur Facebook. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/ma...

.../boot/initrd.img-3.5.0-24-generic /boot/initrd.img-3.5.0-24-generic: 3 extents found # btrfs filesystem defrag /boot/initrd.img-3.5.0-24-generic # echo $? 20 # filefrag /boot/initrd.img-3.5.0-24-generic /boot/initrd.img-3.5.0-24-generic: 3 extents found Any clue appreciated ;-) TIA. -- Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@petaramesh.org> http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

...Still, all of my machines are slow like hell and I''m most of the time in mode « Working my patience while waiting for the HD LED to go off ». I haven''t noticed any real-life noticeable improvement upgrading the kernels from 3.5.x to 3.8.x So I''m wondering... -- Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@petaramesh.org> http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E Ne cherchez pas : Je ne suis pas sur Facebook. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/ma...

...w ;-) I''m now looking for quota support, but, even though the wiki page and Wikipedia english page says BTRFS now has quota support, I couldn''t find any documentation or specific information about it. If such documentation exists, I would appreciate a pointer... TIA. -- Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@petaramesh.org> http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E Ne cherchez pas : Je ne suis pas sur Facebook. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/ma...

...ncel /'. To see the status use 'btrfs scrub status [-d] /'. root@zafu:~# btrfs scrub status / scrub status for 13c87f57-3a85-4daf-a4bf-ba777407c169 scrub started at Mon Apr 7 09:49:48 2014, running for 693 seconds total bytes scrubbed: 34.06GiB with 0 errors -- Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@petaramesh.org> http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

...and shorten the SSD lifespan... Or am I mistaken ? Is there any pro/cons currently, on a 3.14 kernel, about using BTRFS along with an SSD ? Is there specific advice about leaf size, use of compression, snapshots, (auto-)defrag etc, that might be relevant especially for SSDs ? TIA. -- Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@petaramesh.org> http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

...i.e: # btrfs fi df / Data, single: total=106.00GiB, used=88.28GiB System, DUP: total=32.00MiB, used=24.00KiB Metadata, DUP: total=1.00GiB, used=520.36MiB unknown, single: total=176.00MiB, used=0.00 # btrfs --version Btrfs v3.14.2 # uname -r 3.15.5-200.fc20.x86_64 TIA, kind regards. -- Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@petaramesh.org> http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

As of the latest updates to anaconda and grub2 for Fedora 18, it is now possible to install with /boot as a btrfs subvolume. The way that grub2 is handling this is the "reach down" to the files it needs as if the subvolume was a directory. Is this OK? At this point I am not worried about snapshots or any other complexities. If the subvolume name is known. should grub2 be able to

Hi list, I don''t trust theoretical benchmarks that much and prefer "real-life benchs" on the occasion, so here''s mine: Given 4 laptops, the most powerful of which was running BTRFS and the others ext3 or ext4, all machines running Ubuntu 11.04 Natty 32-bit with a stock Ubuntu 2.6.38-11 kernel, all machines were given the following FS-intensive task : - Upgrade

...errors 400 root 667 inode 50504 errors 400 found 54962528257 bytes used err is 1 total csum bytes: 52166300 total tree bytes: 1531371520 total fs tree bytes: 1376681984 btree space waste bytes: 382927315 file data blocks allocated: 103024238592 referenced 102409895936 Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 -- Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@petaramesh.org> http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E Ne cherchez pas : Je ne suis pas sur Facebook. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/ma...