search for: personally

Struggling a little with getting the syntax right for a STI model. Prob just being a bit dense. Couple of questions I''m hoping you guys can answer: Assume here I''ve got: class Person class Manager < Person class Slave < Person 1) How does person[:type] differ from person.type when type is the column used to specify the subclass. They seem to output the same

Hello all, I want to upate a entry in a one to many relation, but is doesn''t work. I can add or delete a specific entry, but I can''t update it. Can anyone help me? Here is the code: class Person < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :materials end class Material < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to: person end class PersonController < ApplicationController def update

While putting my R code into functions, I've encountered a ddply function nesting issue and need a bit of advice on the proper way to fix it.? I've tried several approahces, but neither worked and I need to have the ability to include the "cut", "range", and "fullseq" methods within ddply.? (For a bit of that explanation refer to

I think this test should pass but it doesn''t 1) NoMethodError in ''Person should return full name'' undefined method `full_name?'' for #<Person:0x3567964> ./spec/models/person_spec.rb:43: describe Person do it "should return full name" do person = Person.new person.should be_full_name end end class Person < ActiveRecord::Base def

I sleep better with it in place in production mode and I only get one error notice - every once in a while for a problem that I have fixed in development branch that I am not ready to merge in the main trunk yet. I want to keep the error mailer code in place in development code for obvious reasons and even though I can set up filters for my mail system, how can I simply shut it off for development

Hello, I''ve tried to set up a class with acts_as_list with a scope argument that restricts a list to records with the same foreign key. For example : database : CREATE TABLE `families` ( `id` int(11) NOT NULL auto_increment, `name` varchar(255) NOT NULL default '''', PRIMARY KEY (`id`) ) ENGINE=MyISAM DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 AUTO_INCREMENT=3 ; INSERT INTO

Hi, I'm using Asterisk@home and am having trouble using the conference bridge that comes built in. We're using Polycom phones. When we transfer the first person into the conference room (e.g. 8101) , they get into the room fine. When we try to transfer a second person into the conference room, they get dropped as soon as we finish the transfer. This is using Polycom SoundPoint 301

G'day all, I'm using Asterisk 1.4 and am trying to work out a way to bring people into a conference call. In the ideal scenario two people would be talking and one of them would push some keys, then a phone number and then the three of them would be in a conference. From there they should be able to bring in other people as well. This seems to be what the Asterisk n-way call HOWTO

Code: <%= check_box_tag("person[#{person.id}][is_approved]", 1, true) %> Rendered output: <input checked="checked" id="person[7][is_approved]" name="person[7][is_approved]" value="1" type="checkbox"> Problem: The value of "1" is always passed, even if the box is UNCHECKED. Suggestions? Thanks! -- Posted via

I''m trying to figure out an elegant way to do this: I have the following three tables: people, employer, employees And consequently the following three models: class Person < ActiveRecord::Base end class Employer < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :employees end class Employee < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :person belongs_to :employer end I want to be able to say:

Hello all. I am trying to create a self-referential has_many :through. I used the following site as a guide http://blog.hasmanythrough.com/articles/2006/04/21/self-referential-through but it still doesn''t appear to be working. I have two models. Person and Relationship. A person has many contacts (Which is another person) through relationships class Person < ActiveRecord::Base

...m since 2006 and according to the code of >>> conduct I would now be liable to being banned from working on llvm >>> because of sharing a satirical news. >> I think it's fair to say everyone involved in this discussion would find >> that a ridiculous conclusion. I personally am not too worried by the >> current wording, but are there particular changes which would set your >> mind at ease? Several folks have raised concerns about the section >> which reads "In addition, violations of this code outside these spaces >> may affect a person...

Dear community, I am having a class, let's say Person, Person <- R6Class("Person", public = list( idPerson = NULL, name = NULL, age = NULL, initialize = function(idPerson = NA, name = NA, age = NA) { self$idPerson <- idPerson

i have these two really similar methods in my addressbook controller. def edit_company @company = Company.find(params[:id]) if request.post? and @company.update_attributes(params[:company]) flash[:notice] = ''Company was successfully edited.'' redirect_to :action => ''show'', :id => @company end end def edit_person

Hi, lets say I have a a table, "Linkings" that I am using for polymorphic associations. One of the associations is to the "person" table, and there are several other associations. "Person" has 2 types, "slacker" and "suckup". It is modelled as such: class Linking < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :person belongs_to :linkable, :polymorphic

Hi Bill, > Please read this proposal and send me your comments, suggestions, and concerns. this proposal looks great to me. Thanks for working on it. I have a few minor comments, see below. > //===-------------------------- > // The 'landingpad' Instruction > // > > The 'landingpad' instruction replaces the current 'llvm.eh.exception' and >

I have two classes Person and Job defined as follows: class Person < ActiveRecord::Base :has_and_belongs_to_many jobs def add_job(job_name) job = Job.find_by_name(job_name) # See if this job exists if job.nil? # If this job doesn''t exist job = Job.new # Create a new job job.name = job_name #

Hello, I have a Company that has_and_belongs_to_many Persons. A Person has_many Emails. I want to display each Person''s Email for each Company, so I try this: companies = Company.find(:all) for company in companies persons = company.persons for person in persons puts person.email end end Unfortunately, this doesn''t work correctly. Let''s say the id of

I discovered an interesting aspect of has_many behavior that I''m struggling to work around. I''m not sure if I''m doing something wrong, or if it''s a legitimate bug, or if it''s an inherent part of Rails that I just have to learn to deal with. It boils down to these two problems: - changes in collection objects (i.e. models that belong_to a container

See below. On Wed, 15 Nov 2017, Cristina Pascual wrote: > Dear community, > > I am having a class, let's say Person, > > Person <- R6Class("Person", > public = list( > idPerson = NULL, > name = NULL, > age = NULL, > initialize =