search for: persisting

On 20/10/16 14:10, Amitay Isaacs wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Alex Crow via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org <mailto:samba at lists.samba.org>> wrote: > > Hi list > > We recently upgraded our fileservers from Centos supplied 4.2.10 > to Sernet 4.4.6, and then our DCs from 3.6.x to 4.4.6. > > It seems that since then we've

This patch contains fixes for persistent grants implementation v2: * handle == 0 is a valid handle, so initialize grants in blkback setting the handle to BLKBACK_INVALID_HANDLE instead of 0. Reported by Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk. * new_map is a boolean, use "true" or "false" instead of 1 and 0. Reported by Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk. * blkfront announces the

Dear list members, Could anyone tell me if there is an equivalent of the Matlab declaration 'persistant' in R? Thank you very much, Bernard Gregorry. (Matlaber converted to R). --------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi list We recently upgraded our fileservers from Centos supplied 4.2.10 to Sernet 4.4.6, and then our DCs from 3.6.x to 4.4.6. It seems that since then we've had problems with locks not being obeyed on all nodes - they only seem to work when a second client opens a file on the same node as the first client. For example, when a user opens an Excel file I will see something like this

For anyone using CVS HEAD, if you are using queue member persistence or agent persistence, your next update will cause the persistence to break. The storage format for these elements has been changed so that it can be more easily extended in the future, but this required breaking compatibility. This should be the last time these features will be broken by an upgrade :-)

Hi, I and a few folks on #camping thought it would be nice to have either cookie based or file based session handling. This would eliminate the need for creating a sessions table in the database (or a sequence), which feels too heavy for a lightweight framework like Camping anyway. Plus, we can more easily avoid nasty adapter errors. :) The general consensus was to create a separate

As they iterate through their list of arguments, both ovirt_storage_config and remove_config first convert each of them into a fully qualified path before processing. Related: rhbz#576239 Signed-off-by: Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce at redhat.com> --- scripts/ovirt-functions | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1078 Bug ID: 1078 Summary: please provide a firewall scripts drop-in folder Product: iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: unknown Assignee:

hi Michael： We want to implement the ‘persistent handle’ function under Windows 7(SMB 2.1), which has only local ‘durable handle’. For now my plan is just to synchronize the following files between cluster nodes: smbXsrv_open_global.tdb.0 smbXsrv_session_global.tdb.0 smbXsrv_tcon_global.tdb.0 locking.tdb.0 It probably won’t be completed, so I’m writing to ask for your advice. Any help would be

Hello, mtx and therefor amanda use generic device /dev/sg<x> for tape changer. These devices change on reboot. How to make them persistent? /dev/sch0 and /dev/sch1 seem to be persistent. /dev/tape/by-id/ shows links from WWID to generic device An UDEV rule could help? I have not found any example. -- Viele Gr??e Helmut Drodofsky Internet XS Service GmbH He?br?hlstra?e 15 70565

From: Matt Fleming <matt at console-pimps.org> Date sent: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:32:07 +0100 Subject: Re: [syslinux] Menu system bug - MENU DEFAULT not working > On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 23:09 +0200, Tomas M wrote: > > > Where xxx is a *different* menu. I count 4. Are you able to reproduce > > > the problem with a simpler config file? > >

Hello, I have a two node replica 3.8 GlusterFS cluster and am trying to find out the best way to use a GlusterFS volume as persistent storage for docker containers to store their data (e.g. web assets). I was thinking that the simplest method would be to mount my GlusterFS volume for that purpose on all docker nodes using FUSE and then simply start containers which require persistent storage with

Resolves: rhbz#556616 Signed-off-by: Darryl L. Pierce <dpierce at redhat.com> --- scripts/ovirt-functions | 107 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/ovirt-functions b/scripts/ovirt-functions index 6435387..7ed6491 100644 --- a/scripts/ovirt-functions +++ b/scripts/ovirt-functions @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -#

hi Michael, Sorry for taking so long to reply, I just get back on vacation. Your advice is very helpful. Our purpose is no IO interrupted with Window 7 cifs client accessing the shared folder when virtual IP taken over by another node. SMB3.0 or newer protocol do meet that demand, but Window 7 cifs client only supports SMB2.1 protocol and previous versions. So we need implement a

Dear LLVM developers, Just as LLVM IR can be read/write via persistent bitcode (*.bc *.ll) files, is there any similar implementation in LLVM to read/write Machine IR (MIR) via a persistent file? If not and I would like to add it (e.g. for ARM or RISC-V), could you direct me materials and/or LLVM source code modules where I should start with? Best Regards, Lele Ma -------------- next part

When my machine installs (CentOS 6.3) the two network cards are getting reversed. The PCI card is getting eth0 and the motherboard is getting eth1. I would like them in reverse order to keep things the same as they used to be. How can I easily tell these two to reverse? Generate the 70-persistent-net-rules with motherboard eth0 first then the PCI slot? Thanks, Jerry

Anyone? > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Persistent storage for docker containers from a Gluster volume > Local Time: June 25, 2017 6:38 PM > UTC Time: June 25, 2017 4:38 PM > From: mabi at protonmail.ch > To: Gluster Users <gluster-users at gluster.org> > Hello, > I have a two node replica 3.8 GlusterFS cluster and am trying to find out the best way

Hi, I have a one-to-many relationship. I want to be able to add objects to the collection w/out persisting them. How do I do this? The only thing I can''t think of is to use a transaction and roll it back. In other words - I want to do this: o = Order.find(1) p = Product.find(1) o.products << p # but don''t persist this I assume I''m just missing something obvious her...

This patch implements persistent grants for the xen-blk{front,back} mechanism. The effect of this change is to reduce the number of unmap operations performed, since they cause a (costly) TLB shootdown. This allows the I/O performance to scale better when a large number of VMs are performing I/O. Previously, the blkfront driver was supplied a bvec[] from the request queue. This was granted to

Running into problems configuring different locations for the volatile and other database directories. Can someone provide a quick sanity check on what I'm doing below? Thank you. Given [database] volatile database directory = /var/cache/dbdir/volatile persistent database directory = /var/cache/dbdir/persistent state database directory = /var/cache/dbdir/state And given, [root