search for: persevering

Hi Folks, Now that LLVM 11.0.0 has been released, it's time to prepare for the final step envisionned in the previous RFC named *[RFC] Python 2 / Python 3 status* [0], ie. requiring Python3.6 for LLVM 12.0.0, to be released in 2021. At least Fedora already only ships Python3 and we didn't have much bugs reported wrt. Python compatibility for the LLVM toolchain. Indeed, all Python scripts

...that if you aren't developing with git for the local branch, >> then it would be insanely painful > > That is exactly the situation I am in. I have tried to change this many > times but it is out of my control, unfortunately. Yet I keep trying. > :) I'm glad you're persevering! You will eventually succeed :) > I'm not saying that LLVM should switch to git because of my situation. > I'm simply highlighting the way things are now and expressing that the > LLVM community is missing out on a bunch of improvements we've made > because it is so darn pa...

On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 00:59 -0800, M. Balridge wrote: > > The main problem is : After some time of indexing from Dovecot, Dovecot > > returns errors (invalid SID, etc...) and Solr return "out of range > > indexes" errors > > I've been watching the progress of this thread with no small concern, mainly > because I've been tasked with providing a

On 21/04/16 12:46, Ian Collier wrote: > I hear your frustration - we've had the same troubles. My understanding > of this (which may be wrong) is: > > - The Badlock patches broke something in the Samba server which > means it's no longer able to contact the Windows AD in order to > authenticate users. My understanding is that the Badlock patches fixed a

I hope you are aware that "linking with Xapian" requires somewhat more work than just -lxapian in linker? If you or someone feels like writing fts_xapian, go for it. Aki > On 04 January 2019 at 08:20 Joan Moreau via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org> wrote: > > > What about consedering linking Dovecot with Xapian librairies instead of > going to nightmare Solr ?

A starting point would be to have a look at the current FTS plugins: https://github.com/dovecot/core/tree/master/src/plugins/fts-solrandhttps://github.com/dovecot/core/tree/master/src/plugins/fts-squat -M Am Freitag, den 04.01.2019, 18:17 +0800 schrieb Joan Moreau via dovecot: > Why not, but please guide me about the core structure (mandatory > funcitons, etc..) of a typical Dovecot FTS

Dear Nick, thanks for writing. I no longer work on development of UPS drivers; you will probably get a more up-to-date answer from the nut-upsuser mailing list (cc'd). I don't know if the Back-UPS 550 has similar commands to the Back-UPS ES 650. If it has a USB connection, then the answer is probably yes. The UPS will automatically turn itself back on after a power failure; this is the

The real main differecne seems coming from "diffconfig.xml" When I put yours, Solr delete (!) schema.xml and create a "manage-schema" and starts complaining about useless types (tdates, booleans, etc..) that are not needed for Mail fileds When I put mine (from standard distribution of Arch), it keeps things as they are (yeah !), does not complains about those useless types

Hi, There's probably some simple way of doing this, but I'm just not seeing it - How do I get the background to be white instead of grey when I have a cloud plot (using the lattices package)? par(bg="white") isn't working. I'm assuming par commands won't work on lattice plots. What should I use instead? Thanks, Adrienne [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 01:25:14PM +0100, Rowland penny wrote: > My understanding is that the Badlock patches fixed a multitude of security > problems, That's not disputed, and is why we have persevered in trying to make the patched version work instead of just reverting back to the previous version (you'll note that one response on this thread advocated doing that). >

Hi, I've made two patches against current svn for theora; one for general autotools stuff, and one for -uninstalled.pc Ralph, I think I submitted at least part of the first already once before, was there something wrong with it or was it just an oversight ? Let me know if they need fixing. Patches are at http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/patches/theora/ together with explanations. I

>From CNET news: Belgium cracks down on file swapping By The Associated Press Special to CNET News.com February 15, 2001, 3:20 p.m. PT BRUSSELS, Belgium--Acting on complaints from the music industry, police have raided the homes of people who use music-sharing Web sites, looking for evidence they infringed copyright rules, the prosecutors' office said Thursday. Police searched the home

On 03/01/2016 10:24 PM, g wrote: > to pass time waiting for reply, went thru kde application launcher. > > found this progs have no icon: > > cheese > > audit logs > > media player > > note pad > regedit > wineconfig > winefile > winehelp > wine software uninstall > wine wordpad > > audio cd extractor >

> The main problem is : After some time of indexing from Dovecot, Dovecot > returns errors (invalid SID, etc...) and Solr return "out of range > indexes" errors I've been watching the progress of this thread with no small concern, mainly because I've been tasked with providing a server-side email search facility with a budget and manpower level that comes down to mainly

I appear to have 'installed' wine correctly and get appropriate output from 'wine -version' However, when I try to run solitaire, the following happens. [root@pato gallun]# wine -winver win31 -desktop 640*480 /win98/windows/sol.exe Warning: could not find wine config [Drive x] entry for current working directory /home/gallun; starting in windows directory. Warning:

What about consedering linking Dovecot with Xapian librairies instead of going to nightmare Solr ? https://xapian.org/features On 2019-01-02 17:10, John Tulp wrote: > On Wed, 2019-01-02 at 00:59 -0800, M. Balridge wrote: The main problem is : After some time of indexing from Dovecot, Dovecot > returns errors (invalid SID, etc...) and Solr return "out of range > indexes"

Why not, but please guide me about the core structure (mandatory funcitons, etc..) of a typical Dovecot FTS plugin On 2019-01-04 17:20, Aki Tuomi wrote: > I hope you are aware that "linking with Xapian" requires somewhat more work than just -lxapian in linker? If you or someone feels like writing fts_xapian, go for it. > > Aki > > On 04 January 2019 at 08:20 Joan

On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 10:35, Alexandre Courtiol <alexandre.courtiol at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks a lot for persevering. > > I?aki, that sounds very promising, could you please tell me what software your SMB share is running on (i.e. what does the server side look like?), and if it's Samba, then what version did you use? There was a Windows 10 machine around, so I created a test folder and hit "share...

Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> writes: > The thing about this is that git-svn (un?)fortunately works so well > that you can get all of these benefits with the main repo still in > SVN. Hence, it is really a moot point regarding a switch to git for > the main repo. E.g.: I agree that git-svn is a big help but it is not the same as native git. For one thing, it can't

...en enable the flag on individual groups of instructions/multi-classes, testing and removing them from the manual tables in a relatively controlled fashion. Similarly, new instructions can be enabled in a safe, staged approach without needing a ‘regenerate a full exceptions list’ stage. Thanks for persevering with this Ayman! Simon.