Displaying 20 results from an estimated 340 matches for "perpetuate".
Did you mean:
perpetuates
2018 Jun 08
2
C7, encryption, and clevis
On 06/08/18 15:26, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> On 06/08/18 13:48, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Frank Cox wrote:
>>>>>> so if it would work, replace shortname with short and short1?
>>>>
>>>> With all of this hokey-pokey surrounding licensing and mac addresses, I
>>>> wonder if this outfit is
2018 Jun 08
5
C7, encryption, and clevis
On 06/08/18 13:48, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> Frank Cox wrote:
>>>> so if it would work, replace shortname with short and short1?
>>
>> With all of this hokey-pokey surrounding licensing and mac addresses, I
>> wonder if this outfit is actually still in compliance with the terms of
>> their license for this software, whatever it may be?
>>
>> If
2018 Jun 08
1
C7, encryption, and clevis
On 06/08/18 15:45, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> On 06/08/18 15:26, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> <SNIP>
>>>> On a similar note: one of the companies whose software scientists here
>>>> were using a lot (IDL is a product) changed hand several times, and
>>>> last owner changed licensing terms and stopped signing perpetual
2018 Jun 08
0
C7, encryption, and clevis
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On 06/08/18 13:48, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
>> Frank Cox wrote:
>>>>> so if it would work, replace shortname with short and short1?
>>>
>>> With all of this hokey-pokey surrounding licensing and mac addresses, I
>>> wonder if this outfit is actually still in compliance with the terms of
>>> their license for this
2018 Jun 08
2
C7, encryption, and clevis
> > so if it would work, replace shortname with short and short1?
With all of this hokey-pokey surrounding licensing and mac addresses, I wonder if this outfit is actually still in compliance with the terms of their license for this software, whatever it may be?
If the software licensed to run only on Machine X and Machine X has now been junked and replace by Machine Y, then isn't the
2018 Jun 08
0
C7, encryption, and clevis
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On 06/08/18 15:26, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
<SNIP>
>>> On a similar note: one of the companies whose software scientists here
>>> were using a lot (IDL is a product) changed hand several times, and
>>> last owner changed licensing terms and stopped signing perpetual
licenses.
>>> With perpetual license you were able to keep
2007 May 31
1
Mac OS X crash bug?
Hi all,
I want to check if this is a bug for which I should file a report.
I am using R2.5.0 on OS X 10.4.9. When I invoke the data editor and
when I change the values of individual cells, it seems to work as
intended. However, when I try to delete/add a row/column, R.app
crashes. I've attached the crash log.
Best,
-Nathan
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and
2020 Jul 19
3
Speed-up/Cache loadNamespace()
Thanks for the quick responses. As you both suggested storing the packages
to local drive is feasible but comes with a size restriction I wanted to
avoid. I'll keep this in mind as plan B.
@Hugh: 2. would impose even greater slowdowns and 4. is just not feasible.
However, 3. sounds interesting - how would this work in a Linux environment?
Thank you,
Mario
Am So., 19. Juli 2020 um 20:11 Uhr
2007 Jul 29
4
Server dying with perpetual "Connection reset by peer"
I''m at a loss to explain a very strange error I''m getting.
This seems to happen on our production system where we have a
backgroundrb server sharing a host with a Rails app running on
Mongrel. The first one or two, occasionally three, calls to a worker
(direct MiddleMan calls from Rails, not scheduled) succeed, but
afterwards, the server fails to initialize new workers.
2008 Mar 11
2
[LLVMdev] NewNightlyTester.pl: split into phases?
...user configure.
Writing a script would be a difficult task, since it would have to be
tested on as many architectures and configurations as possible, with the
developer having to rely on error reports to fix things (difficult, lots
of work, slow progress).
Options, on the other hand, would tend to perpetuate current entry
barriers.
I'm not too happy about either option, but probably a choice must be
made.
Which shall it be?
> In addition to using a prebuilt binary.
This would be simple, of course.
Regards,
Jo
2006 May 30
2
acts_as_queue
wondering if anyone tried this patch. (i havent, seeing as its 1228
lines long, 10 months old, and cant take serious a patch many orders
larger than competing web frameworks)
in many cases i want to keep about 10 things around, eg recent searches,
new items (spanning multiple classes), referers, page views, without
logging them for perpetuity. so i guess this isnt a normal queue, more
like a
2019 Sep 10
2
[RFC] changing variable naming rules
> On Sep 9, 2019, at 4:24 AM, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 6:17 PM Björn Pettersson A via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> I'm a little bit curious to hear more about the experiences from the changes in LLD.
>> I’m thinking about things like:
> [..]
>> - merging of
2014 Oct 07
4
[LLVMdev] lld coding style
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote:
> On Oct 6, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote:
>
> Looks like most people in this thread support using LLVM style in LLD. I
> also had an offline discussion and many people wanted to have one coding
> style in all LLVM projects. So I'm convinced that we should do that.
2010 Jun 11
2
Samba 4--Somethings decidedly broken
Hmmm...not quite sure where to go to fix this up.
Samba 4 PDC, 1 W2K3R2, 1 W2K8R2 additional DC's. samba.log
perpetually spewing:
[Fri Jun 11 14:47:42 2010 PDT, 0
librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:619:dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv()]
Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 -
NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER
[Fri Jun 11 14:47:42 2010 PDT, 0
2016 Jan 26
2
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> wrote:
>
> This is distinct from:
That may be distinct, but:
> struct foo *x = READ_ONCE(*ptr);
> smp_read_barrier_depends();
> x->bar = 5;
This case is complete BS. Stop perpetuating it. I already removed a
number of bogus cases of it, and I removed the incorrect
2016 Jan 26
2
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> wrote:
>
> This is distinct from:
That may be distinct, but:
> struct foo *x = READ_ONCE(*ptr);
> smp_read_barrier_depends();
> x->bar = 5;
This case is complete BS. Stop perpetuating it. I already removed a
number of bogus cases of it, and I removed the incorrect
2016 Apr 25
2
Vulnerability patch issue for 4.1.x
Hi list,
When I back ported vulnerability patch to existing samba4.1.21, I'm facing many fileshare access functionality breaks.
(All issues are with DCE-RPC calls failures. Even though I have applied DCE-RPC patch)
I see vulnerability patches have been provided for 3.6.x, 4.0, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 but I don't see 4.1 patch for this.
Many functions difference are there between 4.0, (4.1) ,
2007 Jan 20
1
Squirrelmail Login Error
One user attempts to log in, and perpetually gets this from Squirrelmail:
ERROR: Bad or malformed request.
Query: THREAD ORDEREDSUBJECT ISO-8859-1 ALL
Server responded: Error in IMAP command UID: ORDEREDSUBJECT threading is
currently
not supported.
Dovecot's logs are clean.
--
Jay Chandler
Network Administrator
Chapman University
2007 Apr 18
1
[Bridge] Election of root port
Hi,
I have a situation where in there are 2 switches A and B.
port 0 of A is connected to port 0 of B
port 1 of A is connected to port 1 of B
all the four ports are in auto negotiation and 100mbps
Last byte of MAC of A = 7F
Last byte of MAC of B = 7E
(remaining bytes of the MAC address are identical)
Considering the switch B will be elected as root bridge which port of switch
A will be root
2006 May 20
2
Starting/Stopping a process via web interface?
''Sup everybody?!
I''ll be wanting to start/stop a background process via RoR''s web
interface (probably by clicking a form button). When activated, this
process will do its stuff perpetually, until deactivated again. Any
ideas how to go about this? cron would probably be involved.
Thanks,
Joe
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.