search for: perpetually

On 06/08/18 15:26, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> On 06/08/18 13:48, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> Frank Cox wrote: >>>>>> so if it would work, replace shortname with short and short1? >>>> >>>> With all of this hokey-pokey surrounding licensing and mac addresses, I >>>> wonder if this outfit is

On 06/08/18 13:48, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Frank Cox wrote: >>>> so if it would work, replace shortname with short and short1? >> >> With all of this hokey-pokey surrounding licensing and mac addresses, I >> wonder if this outfit is actually still in compliance with the terms of >> their license for this software, whatever it may be? >> >> If

On 06/08/18 15:45, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> On 06/08/18 15:26, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > <SNIP> >>>> On a similar note: one of the companies whose software scientists here >>>> were using a lot (IDL is a product) changed hand several times, and >>>> last owner changed licensing terms and stopped signing perpetual

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On 06/08/18 13:48, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Frank Cox wrote: >>>>> so if it would work, replace shortname with short and short1? >>> >>> With all of this hokey-pokey surrounding licensing and mac addresses, I >>> wonder if this outfit is actually still in compliance with the terms of >>> their license for this

> > so if it would work, replace shortname with short and short1? With all of this hokey-pokey surrounding licensing and mac addresses, I wonder if this outfit is actually still in compliance with the terms of their license for this software, whatever it may be? If the software licensed to run only on Machine X and Machine X has now been junked and replace by Machine Y, then isn't the

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On 06/08/18 15:26, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: <SNIP> >>> On a similar note: one of the companies whose software scientists here >>> were using a lot (IDL is a product) changed hand several times, and >>> last owner changed licensing terms and stopped signing perpetual licenses. >>> With perpetual license you were able to keep

Hi all, I want to check if this is a bug for which I should file a report. I am using R2.5.0 on OS X 10.4.9. When I invoke the data editor and when I change the values of individual cells, it seems to work as intended. However, when I try to delete/add a row/column, R.app crashes. I've attached the crash log. Best, -Nathan -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and

Thanks for the quick responses. As you both suggested storing the packages to local drive is feasible but comes with a size restriction I wanted to avoid. I'll keep this in mind as plan B. @Hugh: 2. would impose even greater slowdowns and 4. is just not feasible. However, 3. sounds interesting - how would this work in a Linux environment? Thank you, Mario Am So., 19. Juli 2020 um 20:11 Uhr

I''m at a loss to explain a very strange error I''m getting. This seems to happen on our production system where we have a backgroundrb server sharing a host with a Rails app running on Mongrel. The first one or two, occasionally three, calls to a worker (direct MiddleMan calls from Rails, not scheduled) succeed, but afterwards, the server fails to initialize new workers.

Am Samstag, den 08.03.2008, 14:02 -0800 schrieb Tanya Lattner: > - ability to check out llvm-gcc or update llvm-gcc and build it before > running tests. This seems to be a bit more complicated than I thought. There are variations in the build process depending on whether it's a Darwin system or not, installed gcc version, and presence or absence of multilib extensions. I'm not

wondering if anyone tried this patch. (i havent, seeing as its 1228 lines long, 10 months old, and cant take serious a patch many orders larger than competing web frameworks) in many cases i want to keep about 10 things around, eg recent searches, new items (spanning multiple classes), referers, page views, without logging them for perpetuity. so i guess this isnt a normal queue, more like a

> On Sep 9, 2019, at 4:24 AM, Hans Wennborg via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 6:17 PM Björn Pettersson A via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> I'm a little bit curious to hear more about the experiences from the changes in LLD. >> I’m thinking about things like: > [..] >> - merging of

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > On Oct 6, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > Looks like most people in this thread support using LLVM style in LLD. I > also had an offline discussion and many people wanted to have one coding > style in all LLVM projects. So I'm convinced that we should do that.

Hmmm...not quite sure where to go to fix this up. Samba 4 PDC, 1 W2K3R2, 1 W2K8R2 additional DC's. samba.log perpetually spewing: [Fri Jun 11 14:47:42 2010 PDT, 0 librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:619:dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv()] Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 - NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER [Fri Jun 11 14:47:42 2010 PDT, 0 dsdb/repl/drepl_notify.c:189:dreplsrv_notify_op_callback()] dreplsrv_notify:...

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> wrote: > > This is distinct from: That may be distinct, but: > struct foo *x = READ_ONCE(*ptr); > smp_read_barrier_depends(); > x->bar = 5; This case is complete BS. Stop perpetuating it. I already removed a number of bogus cases of it, and I removed the incorrect

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> wrote: > > This is distinct from: That may be distinct, but: > struct foo *x = READ_ONCE(*ptr); > smp_read_barrier_depends(); > x->bar = 5; This case is complete BS. Stop perpetuating it. I already removed a number of bogus cases of it, and I removed the incorrect

Hi list, When I back ported vulnerability patch to existing samba4.1.21, I'm facing many fileshare access functionality breaks. (All issues are with DCE-RPC calls failures. Even though I have applied DCE-RPC patch) I see vulnerability patches have been provided for 3.6.x, 4.0, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 but I don't see 4.1 patch for this. Many functions difference are there between 4.0, (4.1) ,

One user attempts to log in, and perpetually gets this from Squirrelmail: ERROR: Bad or malformed request. Query: THREAD ORDEREDSUBJECT ISO-8859-1 ALL Server responded: Error in IMAP command UID: ORDEREDSUBJECT threading is currently not supported. Dovecot's logs are clean. -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator Chapman University

...t 1 of B all the four ports are in auto negotiation and 100mbps Last byte of MAC of A = 7F Last byte of MAC of B = 7E (remaining bytes of the MAC address are identical) Considering the switch B will be elected as root bridge which port of switch A will be root port. Will this configuration work perpetually?

''Sup everybody?! I''ll be wanting to start/stop a background process via RoR''s web interface (probably by clicking a form button). When activated, this process will do its stuff perpetually, until deactivated again. Any ideas how to go about this? cron would probably be involved. Thanks, Joe -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.