search for: perpetu

...ardless of the technical ability to spoof whatever it's looking for? >> >> Frank, I 100% agree with you. The only case with spoofed MAC address and >> license that may have chance to stand in court will be if all below are >> true: >> >> 1. the company issued perpetual license. >> 2. the company does not exist >> 3. the original hardware died (be it motherboard whose embedded NIC >> license was locked to or network card) >> 4. single replacement machine (meeting requirements of license; >> sometimes it is number of CPUs/cores, memo...

...for Machine Y or be out-of compliance regardless >> of the technical ability to spoof whatever it's looking for? Frank, I 100% agree with you. The only case with spoofed MAC address and license that may have chance to stand in court will be if all below are true: 1. the company issued perpetual license. 2. the company does not exist 3. the original hardware died (be it motherboard whose embedded NIC license was locked to or network card) 4. single replacement machine (meeting requirements of license; sometimes it is number of CPUs/cores, memory, etc) is used to replace it [imminently...

...18 15:26, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > <SNIP> >>>> On a similar note: one of the companies whose software scientists here >>>> were using a lot (IDL is a product) changed hand several times, and >>>> last owner changed licensing terms and stopped signing perpetual > licenses. >>>> With perpetual license you were able to keep upgrading software during >>>> support period, usually 1 year, and keep using last version later >>>> forever only you are locked to that older version. They stopped signing >>>> perpe...

...pliance >>> regardless of the technical ability to spoof whatever it's looking for? > > Frank, I 100% agree with you. The only case with spoofed MAC address and > license that may have chance to stand in court will be if all below are > true: > > 1. the company issued perpetual license. > 2. the company does not exist > 3. the original hardware died (be it motherboard whose embedded NIC > license was locked to or network card) > 4. single replacement machine (meeting requirements of license; > sometimes it is number of CPUs/cores, memory, etc) is used to...

> > so if it would work, replace shortname with short and short1? With all of this hokey-pokey surrounding licensing and mac addresses, I wonder if this outfit is actually still in compliance with the terms of their license for this software, whatever it may be? If the software licensed to run only on Machine X and Machine X has now been junked and replace by Machine Y, then isn't the

...e: > On 06/08/18 15:26, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: <SNIP> >>> On a similar note: one of the companies whose software scientists here >>> were using a lot (IDL is a product) changed hand several times, and >>> last owner changed licensing terms and stopped signing perpetual licenses. >>> With perpetual license you were able to keep upgrading software during >>> support period, usually 1 year, and keep using last version later >>> forever only you are locked to that older version. They stopped signing >>> perpetual licenses, and ma...

...t Tutor John Winthrop House, Harvard University napaxton AT fas DOT harvard DOT edu http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~napaxton ======================================================================== =============================== When you have to stay eight years away from California, you live in a perpetual state of homesickness. - Ronald Reagan The most courageous act is still to think for yourself. Aloud. -Coco Chanel ======================================================================== ===============================

...nage at gmail.com>: > My advice would be to avoid the network in one of the following ways > > 1. Store installed packages on your local drive > 2. Copy the installed packages to a tempdir on your local drive each time > the script is executed > 3. Keep an R session running in perpetuity and source the scripts within > that everlasting session > 4. Rewrite your scripts to use base R only. > > I suspect this solution list is exhaustive. > > On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 at 1:50 am, Mario Annau <mario.annau at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >&g...

I''m at a loss to explain a very strange error I''m getting. This seems to happen on our production system where we have a backgroundrb server sharing a host with a Rails app running on Mongrel. The first one or two, occasionally three, calls to a worker (direct MiddleMan calls from Rails, not scheduled) succeed, but afterwards, the server fails to initialize new workers.

...user configure. Writing a script would be a difficult task, since it would have to be tested on as many architectures and configurations as possible, with the developer having to rely on error reports to fix things (difficult, lots of work, slow progress). Options, on the other hand, would tend to perpetuate current entry barriers. I'm not too happy about either option, but probably a choice must be made. Which shall it be? > In addition to using a prebuilt binary. This would be simple, of course. Regards, Jo

...i havent, seeing as its 1228 lines long, 10 months old, and cant take serious a patch many orders larger than competing web frameworks) in many cases i want to keep about 10 things around, eg recent searches, new items (spanning multiple classes), referers, page views, without logging them for perpetuity. so i guess this isnt a normal queue, more like a pipe with a burning substance at one end.. my initial thoughts are 1) disable id auto-incremenet, find the oldest record out of 10, and overwrite that with the newest (doing this via normal model callbacks). or 2) use acts_as_list, and reorde...

...of Rui’s work on lld? He developed a process in which people with significant out of tree patches were able to catch up, merge the mega patch and move forward without significant churn. I agree it is non-zero, but it is very low, and the cost seems worth the price of forward progress and avoiding perpetual stagnation. -Chris

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Nick Kledzik <kledzik at apple.com> wrote: > On Oct 6, 2014, at 3:44 PM, Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> wrote: > > Looks like most people in this thread support using LLVM style in LLD. I > also had an offline discussion and many people wanted to have one coding > style in all LLVM projects. So I'm convinced that we should do that.

Hmmm...not quite sure where to go to fix this up. Samba 4 PDC, 1 W2K3R2, 1 W2K8R2 additional DC's. samba.log perpetually spewing: [Fri Jun 11 14:47:42 2010 PDT, 0 librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:619:dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv()] Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 - NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER [Fri Jun 11 14:47:42 2010 PDT, 0 dsdb/repl/drepl_notify.c:189:dreplsrv_notify_op_callback()] dreplsrv_not...

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> wrote: > > This is distinct from: That may be distinct, but: > struct foo *x = READ_ONCE(*ptr); > smp_read_barrier_depends(); > x->bar = 5; This case is complete BS. Stop perpetuating it. I already removed a number of bogus cases of it, and I removed the incorrect documentation that had this crap. It's called "smp_READ_barrier_depends()" for a reason. Alpha is the only one that needs it, and alpha needs it only for dependent READS. It's not called smp_r...

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> wrote: > > This is distinct from: That may be distinct, but: > struct foo *x = READ_ONCE(*ptr); > smp_read_barrier_depends(); > x->bar = 5; This case is complete BS. Stop perpetuating it. I already removed a number of bogus cases of it, and I removed the incorrect documentation that had this crap. It's called "smp_READ_barrier_depends()" for a reason. Alpha is the only one that needs it, and alpha needs it only for dependent READS. It's not called smp_r...

Hi list, When I back ported vulnerability patch to existing samba4.1.21, I'm facing many fileshare access functionality breaks. (All issues are with DCE-RPC calls failures. Even though I have applied DCE-RPC patch) I see vulnerability patches have been provided for 3.6.x, 4.0, 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4 but I don't see 4.1 patch for this. Many functions difference are there between 4.0, (4.1) ,

One user attempts to log in, and perpetually gets this from Squirrelmail: ERROR: Bad or malformed request. Query: THREAD ORDEREDSUBJECT ISO-8859-1 ALL Server responded: Error in IMAP command UID: ORDEREDSUBJECT threading is currently not supported. Dovecot's logs are clean. -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator Chapman University

...t 1 of B all the four ports are in auto negotiation and 100mbps Last byte of MAC of A = 7F Last byte of MAC of B = 7E (remaining bytes of the MAC address are identical) Considering the switch B will be elected as root bridge which port of switch A will be root port. Will this configuration work perpetually?

''Sup everybody?! I''ll be wanting to start/stop a background process via RoR''s web interface (probably by clicking a form button). When activated, this process will do its stuff perpetually, until deactivated again. Any ideas how to go about this? cron would probably be involved. Thanks, Joe -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.