search for: permitations

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 8128 matches for "permitations".

Did you mean: germinations
2009 Dec 25
2
compile issues.
Hi all, I am new to Asterik. Ia m trying to compile the source with the latest asterisk-1.6.2.0 these are the issues I am getting. initially,I got mkdir: cannot create directory `/var/lib/asterisk' than after reading the archives: I did: ./configure --enable-dev-mode --prefix=/tmp/asterisk --sysconfdir=/tmp/astconf --localstatedir=/tmp/aststate and than make install.: This is the error I
2009 Dec 23
1
Problems with chan_sip
Calling my home numbers has always worked. Till now. The Asterisk CLI show the following : [Dec 23 10:53:22] NOTICE[25159]: chan_sip.c:12640 handle_response_invite: Failed to authenticate on INVITE to '<sip:092xx90xx at 85.xx.xx.xx>;tag=as5b139383' And after restarting Asterisk, the CLI is flooded by : [Dec 23 11:11:06] WARNING[1468]: chan_sip.c:1817 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of
2018 Jan 24
3
SSH cert extensions and authz key options
Damien, your advice is appreciated. Damien Miller wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jan 2018, Michael Str?der wrote: >> I'm looking at sshd(8), section AUTHORIZED_KEYS FILE FORMAT and >> description for CLI arg -O in ssh-keygen(1). >> >> It seems to me that there could be a 1:1 mapping between SSH cert >> extensions and authz key options by just adding prefix
2010 Jun 10
1
warning : sip_xmit
I'm getting a lot of these on the CLI : [Jun 10 13:41:36] WARNING[4286]: chan_sip.c:1817 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x1b381bb0 (len 554) to 192.168.12.120:2056 returned -1: Operation not permitted [Jun 10 13:41:37] WARNING[4286]: chan_sip.c:1817 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x1b381bb0 (len 554) to 192.168.12.120:2056 returned -1: Operation not permitted [Jun 10 13:41:38] WARNING[4286]:
2003 Feb 09
2
install error
I just download R-1.6.2 source code for unix to install. I am intalling it under redhat linux. But after ./configure, when I try to make, there always error showed: /usr/bin/install: cannot change ownership of `../../bin/BATCH': Operation not permitted /usr/bin/install: cannot change ownership of `../../bin/LINK': Operation not permitted /usr/bin/install: cannot change ownership of
2018 Jan 12
2
SSH cert extensions and authz key options
HI! I'm looking at sshd(8), section AUTHORIZED_KEYS FILE FORMAT and description for CLI arg -O in ssh-keygen(1). It seems to me that there could be a 1:1 mapping between SSH cert extensions and authz key options by just adding prefix "permit-" to the key option. But the man pages differ regarding case of "permit-x11-forwarding" and "X11-forwarding". [1] also
2008 Dec 04
4
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5939] New: rsync: delete of stat xattr failed for ... (in backup): Operation not permitted (1)
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5939 Summary: rsync: delete of stat xattr failed for ... (in backup): Operation not permitted (1) Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo:
2007 Jul 16
1
Tripp Lite OmniSV1500XL
I recently purchased a Tripp Lite OmniSV1500XL and I've had no luck getting nut to work. # lsusb Bus 001 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 Bus 006 Device 002: ID 05e3:0702 Genesys Logic, Inc. USB 2.0 IDE Adapter Bus 006 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 Bus 005 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 Bus 007 Device 001: ID 0000:0000 Bus 004 Device 009: ID 09ae:0001 Tripp Lite Bus 004 Device
2009 Jan 11
2
sip peer permit/deny - Need some explanation
Hi all, I tested with few Asterisk versions from 1.4.18 to 1.4.21, same result. Here is the problem: I have a peer -which is peer AND user- setted up like this [MyPeer] ; type=peer host=xxx.xxx.xxx.139 deny=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 permit=xxx.xxx.xxx.136/255.255.255.248 ;IP address from range 138 to 142 permit=yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy/255.255.255.255 context=from-MyPeer dtfmode=auto disallow=all allow=ulaw,alaw
2003 Sep 09
3
Operation not permitted?
Hello, Can someone tell me what the problem is here. I am doing an rsync on a sendmail spool directory to a folder that is a samba mount. Why is rsync trying to change owner? Does it have to? I tried manually changing owner (as root) on a file that is sitting on the samba mount and I got the same operation not permitted error. Does anybody know why this is? Or do I need to ask in a samba
2005 Dec 23
6
SIP permit/deny
I have the following in sip.conf. It was my understanding that this configuration (ie with deny/permit) would only allow connections from hosts 192.168.10.4 and 192.168.10.5. That doesn't seem to be the case. Asterisk is accepting INVITE's from other addresses. [a00090101] type=friend context=Company1 username=a00090101 ;secret=180 ;insecure=very host=dynamic mailbox=company1@vmusers
2010 May 11
0
more USB logs
# export USB_DEBUG=5 # /usr/local/ups/bin/usbhid-ups -a CP550SLG -DDDDD Network UPS Tools - Generic HID driver 0.34 (2.4.3) USB communication driver 0.31 0.000000 debug level is '5' 0.000426 upsdrv_initups... usb_set_debug: Setting debugging level to 5 (on) usb_os_init: Found USB VFS at /dev/bus/usb usb_os_find_busses: Found 001 usb_os_find_busses: Found 002
2006 Mar 27
8
Trouble with Homes
I am having trouble with getting my Homes section to work properly. When I browse to the server from a Windows client, I can see my home directory. However, when I try to access it, it challenges me for a userID and password. No matter what I enter, I will not allow me access. Can someone point me in the right direction to solve this? Here are the errors... [2006/03/27 11:19:22, 0]
2004 Aug 11
0
Asterisk --> Mediatrix 1204 --> returned -1: Operation not permitted
When I try to make a call using the Mediatrix 1204 is showed on the CLI: -- Executing SetCIDNum("SIP/2009-4df1", "1111") in new stack -- Executing Dial("SIP/2009-4df1", "SIP/2217008@192.168.199.5") in new stack Aug 11 15:14:10 WARNING[1211108144]: chan_sip.c:590 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x81 40c5c (len 794) to 192.168.199.5 returned -1: Operation not
2010 Jun 25
1
sip_xmit: sip_xmit returned -1: Operation not permitted
Hello, my Asterisk CLI is flooded with the following message : [Jun 25 21:24:57] WARNING[15174]: chan_sip.c:1851 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x409cd8f8 (len 519) to 109.236.137.138:1025 returned -1: Operation not permitted [Jun 25 21:25:01] WARNING[15174]: chan_sip.c:1851 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x409cd8f8 (len 519) to 109.236.137.138:1025 returned -1: Operation not permitted [Jun 25 21:25:05]
2005 Sep 08
3
can't update msaccess mdb file
At an account running 3.0.14a Debian (same account as the dual log file issue posted earlier). A user sporadically cannot update an Access mdb file and gets access denied errors. The log: [2005/09/08 12:14:31, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(245) ginny opened file database/EACM & ECC Reports Secure.ldb read=Yes write=Yes (numopen=4) [2005/09/08 12:14:36, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(245) ginny
2018 Mar 20
4
rsync time machine backup permissions
That doesn’t work too. :-( Last login: Mon Mar 19 19:18:16 on console iMac:~ andre$ mount /dev/disk0s2 on / (hfs, local, journaled) devfs on /dev (devfs, local, nobrowse) map -hosts on /net (autofs, nosuid, automounted, nobrowse) map auto_home on /home (autofs, automounted, nobrowse) /dev/disk2 on /Volumes/G-DRIVE Thunderbolt 3 (hfs, local, nodev, nosuid, journaled, noowners) iMac:~ andre$
2014 Jan 16
0
Generic UPS driver
One small comment: When the driver has no permission to access the device, it exits with a segmentation fault, it would be nice to have a more informative error. I'm not really sure if the issue is speciffic to this driver or is it general. I attached the output of an strace with the driver crashing. Best regards. -------------- next part --------------
2009 Oct 02
3
Folder Management Dovecot >1.2
Regardless of the mail client no user can modify, move, delete or subscribe an imap folder with Dovecot >1.2.1 (meanwhile 1.2.5). Dovecot apparently have some dotlock problems: (From dovecot.log) Oct 02 14:58:19 IMAP(jcci): Error: fchown(/candeias/home/jcci/.mail/Maildir/subscriptions.lock, -1, 0(root)) failed: Operation not permitted (egid=1003(management), group based on
2001 Oct 20
2
FSCK?
An EXT3 filesystem technically isn't supposed to require an fsck, correct? Well, as per my last email re: EXT3 Crash?! I ran an fsck on a couple of my LVMs. It said they were clean, but then I decided to be 100% sure and force an fsck. Error after Error after Error after Error. I wound up losing almost half the data on my LVM due to all the errors. What's the real deal? Am I doing