search for: permit

...sk' than after reading the archives: I did: ./configure --enable-dev-mode --prefix=/tmp/asterisk --sysconfdir=/tmp/astconf --localstatedir=/tmp/aststate and than make install.: This is the error I am getting: tar: vm-tocallnum.gsm: Cannot change ownership to uid 1000, gid 1000: Operation not permitted tar: vm-tocancel.gsm: Cannot change ownership to uid 1000, gid 1000: Operation not permitted tar: vm-tocancelmsg.gsm: Cannot change ownership to uid 1000, gid 1000: Operation not permitted tar: vm-toenternumber.gsm: Cannot change ownership to uid 1000, gid 1000: Operation not permitted tar: vm-t...

...invite: Failed to authenticate on INVITE to '<sip:092xx90xx at 85.xx.xx.xx>;tag=as5b139383' And after restarting Asterisk, the CLI is flooded by : [Dec 23 11:11:06] WARNING[1468]: chan_sip.c:1817 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x7b6e710 (len 549) to my_ip:5063 returned -1: Operation not permitted [Dec 23 11:11:06] WARNING[1468]: chan_sip.c:1817 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x7b704e0 (len 543) to my_ip:5062 returned -1: Operation not permitted [Dec 23 11:11:06] WARNING[1468]: chan_sip.c:1817 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x7b722b0 (len 543) to my_ip:5061 returned -1: Operation not permitted [Dec 23...

...Str?der wrote: >> I'm looking at sshd(8), section AUTHORIZED_KEYS FILE FORMAT and >> description for CLI arg -O in ssh-keygen(1). >> >> It seems to me that there could be a 1:1 mapping between SSH cert >> extensions and authz key options by just adding prefix "permit-" to the >> key option. > > No, they are separate namespaces that happen to share similar options. Hmm... >> But the man pages differ regarding case of "permit-x11-forwarding" and >> "X11-forwarding". [1] also says "permit-X11-forwarding&quot...

I'm getting a lot of these on the CLI : [Jun 10 13:41:36] WARNING[4286]: chan_sip.c:1817 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x1b381bb0 (len 554) to 192.168.12.120:2056 returned -1: Operation not permitted [Jun 10 13:41:37] WARNING[4286]: chan_sip.c:1817 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x1b381bb0 (len 554) to 192.168.12.120:2056 returned -1: Operation not permitted [Jun 10 13:41:38] WARNING[4286]: chan_sip.c:1817 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x1b381bb0 (len 554) to 192.168.12.120:2056 returned -1: Operation...

I just download R-1.6.2 source code for unix to install. I am intalling it under redhat linux. But after ./configure, when I try to make, there always error showed: /usr/bin/install: cannot change ownership of `../../bin/BATCH': Operation not permitted /usr/bin/install: cannot change ownership of `../../bin/LINK': Operation not permitted /usr/bin/install: cannot change ownership of `../../bin/Rcmd': Operation not permitted /usr/bin/install: cannot change ownership of `../../bin/Rdiff': Operation not permitted /usr/bin/install: c...

HI! I'm looking at sshd(8), section AUTHORIZED_KEYS FILE FORMAT and description for CLI arg -O in ssh-keygen(1). It seems to me that there could be a 1:1 mapping between SSH cert extensions and authz key options by just adding prefix "permit-" to the key option. But the man pages differ regarding case of "permit-x11-forwarding" and "X11-forwarding". [1] also says "permit-X11-forwarding". So it might only be typo in ssh-keygen(1). Questions: Is there a guaranteed 1:1 mapping between SSH cert extensi...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5939 Summary: rsync: delete of stat xattr failed for ... (in backup): Operation not permitted (1) Product: rsync Version: 3.0.4 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org ReportedBy: paul@cullum.ca QAContac...

...0 fcntl(4, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0 getdents(4, /* 3 entries */, 4096) = 72 open("/dev/bus/usb/001/001", O_RDWR) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) open("/dev/bus/usb/001/001", O_RDONLY) = 5 ioctl(5, USBDEVFS_CONNECTINFO, 0x7fff23b761b0) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted) read(5, "\22\1\20\1\t\0\0@\0\0\0\0\6\2\3\2\1\1", 18) = 18 read(5, "\t\2\31\0\1\1\0\340", 8) = 8 read(5, "\0\t\4\0\0\1\t\0\0\0\7\5\201\3\2\0\377", 17) = 17 close(5) = 0 getdents(4, /* 0 entries */, 4096) = 0 close(4)...

Hi all, I tested with few Asterisk versions from 1.4.18 to 1.4.21, same result. Here is the problem: I have a peer -which is peer AND user- setted up like this [MyPeer] ; type=peer host=xxx.xxx.xxx.139 deny=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 permit=xxx.xxx.xxx.136/255.255.255.248 ;IP address from range 138 to 142 permit=yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy/255.255.255.255 context=from-MyPeer dtfmode=auto disallow=all allow=ulaw,alaw insecure=port,invite nat=yes canreinvite=no call-limit=15 accountcode=MyPeer On incoming calls, when the peer address is the one te...

...meone tell me what the problem is here. I am doing an rsync on a sendmail spool directory to a folder that is a samba mount. Why is rsync trying to change owner? Does it have to? I tried manually changing owner (as root) on a file that is sitting on the samba mount and I got the same operation not permitted error. Does anybody know why this is? Or do I need to ask in a samba mailling list. Here is the error: chown var/spool/mail/********@*******.com : Operation not permitted chown var/spool/mail/********@*******.com : Operation not permitted chown var/spool/mail/********@*******.com : Operation...

I have the following in sip.conf. It was my understanding that this configuration (ie with deny/permit) would only allow connections from hosts 192.168.10.4 and 192.168.10.5. That doesn't seem to be the case. Asterisk is accepting INVITE's from other addresses. [a00090101] type=friend context=Company1 username=a00090101 ;secret=180 ;insecure=very host=dynamic mailbox=company1@vmusers deny=...

...nitups... usb_set_debug: Setting debugging level to 5 (on) usb_os_init: Found USB VFS at /dev/bus/usb usb_os_find_busses: Found 001 usb_os_find_busses: Found 002 usb_os_find_devices: couldn't get connect info usb_os_find_devices: Found 001 on 001 error obtaining child information: Operation not permitted usb_os_find_devices: couldn't get connect info usb_os_find_devices: Found 082 on 002 skipped 1 class/vendor specific interface descriptors usb_os_find_devices: couldn't get connect info usb_os_find_devices: Found 003 on 002 skipped 1 class/vendor specific interface descriptors skipped 1...

...rection to solve this? Here are the errors... [2006/03/27 11:19:22, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(798) 192.63.212.176 (192.63.212.176) couldn't find service . [2006/03/27 11:19:23, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(318) user 'NA\trimblrd' (from session setup) not permitted to access this share (trimblrd) [2006/03/27 11:19:23, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(318) user 'NA\trimblrd' (from session setup) not permitted to access this share (trimblrd) [2006/03/27 11:19:24, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(318) user 'NA\trimblrd' (fr...

..."SIP/2009-4df1", "1111") in new stack -- Executing Dial("SIP/2009-4df1", "SIP/2217008@192.168.199.5") in new stack Aug 11 15:14:10 WARNING[1211108144]: chan_sip.c:590 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x81 40c5c (len 794) to 192.168.199.5 returned -1: Operation not permitted -- Called 2217008@192.168.199.5 Aug 11 15:14:11 WARNING[1125350192]: chan_sip.c:590 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x81 40c5c (len 794) to 192.168.199.5 returned -1: Operation not permitted Aug 11 15:14:12 WARNING[1125350192]: chan_sip.c:590 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x81 40c5c (len 794) to 192.168.1...

Hello, my Asterisk CLI is flooded with the following message : [Jun 25 21:24:57] WARNING[15174]: chan_sip.c:1851 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x409cd8f8 (len 519) to 109.236.137.138:1025 returned -1: Operation not permitted [Jun 25 21:25:01] WARNING[15174]: chan_sip.c:1851 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x409cd8f8 (len 519) to 109.236.137.138:1025 returned -1: Operation not permitted [Jun 25 21:25:05] WARNING[15174]: chan_sip.c:1851 __sip_xmit: sip_xmit of 0x409cd8f8 (len 519) to 109.236.137.138:1025 returned -1: Opera...

...& ECC Reports Secure.mdb read=Yes write=No (numopen=5) [2005/09/08 12:14:36, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(272) ginny closed file database/EACM & ECC Reports Secure.mdb (numopen=4) [2005/09/08 12:21:13, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(314) guest user (from session setup) not permitted to access this share (EACM) [2005/09/08 12:21:13, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(314) guest user (from session setup) not permitted to access this share (EACM) [2005/09/08 12:21:13, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(314) guest user (from session setup) not permitted to access...

...--log-file=/Users/andre/Desktop/log/rsync-$(date "+%Y%m%d%H%M").log /Volumes/LaCie\ d2\ Quadra\ v3/Backups.backupdb /Volumes/G-DRIVE\ Thunderbolt\ 3 Password: rsync: failed to set permissions on "/Volumes/G-DRIVE Thunderbolt 3/Backups.backupdb/André Althoffs iMac": Operation not permitted (1) rsync: symlink "/Volumes/G-DRIVE Thunderbolt 3/Backups.backupdb/André Althoffs iMac/Latest" -> "2018-03-16-210209" failed: Operation not permitted (1) rsync: recv_generator: mkdir "/Volumes/G-DRIVE Thunderbolt 3/Backups.backupdb/André Althoffs iMac/2016-04-11-1309...

...Y|O_CLOEXEC) = 4 getdents(4, /* 3 entries */, 32768) = 72 open("/dev/bus/usb/009/001", O_RDWR) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) open("/dev/bus/usb/009/001", O_RDONLY) = 5 ioctl(5, SNDRV_CTL_IOCTL_ELEM_INFO or USBDEVFS_CONNECTINFO, 0x7fff2c4be0e0) = -1 EPERM (Operation not permitted) read(5, "\22\1\20\1\t\0\0 at k\35\1\0\21\3\3\2\1\1", 18) = 18 read(5, "\t\2\31\0\1\1\0\340", 8) = 8 read(5, "\0\t\4\0\0\1\t\0\0\0\7\5\201\3\2\0\377", 17) = 17 close(5) = 0 getdents(4, /* 0 entries */, 32768) = 0 close(4)...

...no user can modify, move, delete or subscribe an imap folder with Dovecot >1.2.1 (meanwhile 1.2.5). Dovecot apparently have some dotlock problems: (From dovecot.log) Oct 02 14:58:19 IMAP(jcci): Error: fchown(/candeias/home/jcci/.mail/Maildir/subscriptions.lock, -1, 0(root)) failed: Operation not permitted (egid=1003(management), group based on /candeias/home/jcci/.mail/Maildir) Oct 02 14:58:19 IMAP(jcci): Error: file_dotlock_open() failed with subscription file /candeias/home/jcci/.mail/Maildir/subscriptions: Operation not permitted Oct 02 14:58:20 IMAP(jcci): Error: fchown(/candeias/home/jcci/.m...

An EXT3 filesystem technically isn't supposed to require an fsck, correct? Well, as per my last email re: EXT3 Crash?! I ran an fsck on a couple of my LVMs. It said they were clean, but then I decided to be 100% sure and force an fsck. Error after Error after Error after Error. I wound up losing almost half the data on my LVM due to all the errors. What's the real deal? Am I doing