search for: permeat

...as frequent as 3D programs do. Almost each 3D instruction requires to permuate its operands. For example: // Each register is a 4-component vector // the names of the components are x, y, z, w add r0.xy, r1.zxyw, r2.yyyy The components of r1 and r2 and permuted before the addition, but the permeation result is _not_ written backed to r1 and r2. 'zxyw' and 'yyyy' are the permutation patterns (they are called 'swizzle'). 'xy' is called the write mask. The result is written to only x and y component of r0. z and w are left untouched. _Almost each_ instruction s...

...ct? If I chmod 760 Mail/folder/* (then the new emails show in dovecot without the access error) It appears mail comes to the INBOX fine just not individual folders On the initial access, dovecot gets a "missing +r perm" or "+x" in the log. 1: What permission structure should permeate my Mail dir? 2: What might affect the incoming mail file getting wrong permissions/ownership? I'm thinking the later may be a procmail issue unless it is related to initial incorrect permissions? Thanks for any insight. -Walt

...st each 3D instruction requires to > permuate its operands. For example: > > // Each register is a 4-component vector > // the names of the components are x, y, z, w > add r0.xy, r1.zxyw, r2.yyyy > > The components of r1 and r2 and permuted before the addition, but the > permeation result is _not_ written backed to r1 and r2. 'zxyw' and > 'yyyy' are the permutation patterns (they are called 'swizzle'). > 'xy' is called the write mask. The result is written to only x and y > component of r0. z and w are left untouched. To support t...

...= No [SHR] path = /home/winnt/SRVRS/ read only = No force create mode = 0664 force directory mode = 0777 follow symlinks = No [test] path = /test read only = No ------------- I can ping PDCSRV and WINSSRV from Linux by name, I can get the user list from the domain controller, I have the right permeation on the dir ( drwxrwxrwx 2 SRVRS+GiliL SRVRS+IT 4096 Jan 2 11:14 test )... PS: if I try to run smbmount whit "debug level 10" I get in this: <snap> 21055: tree connect failed: ERRDOS - ERRnoaccess (Access denied.) SMB connection failed At this point any help/good idea...

...om both the Golden Gate and Richmond bridges right off Hwy 101, making us within easy 20-30 minutes reach of San Francisco, East Bay, and North Bay. We enjoy all the benefits of being a startup in the SF Bay Area while remaining a comfortable distance from the reality distortion field that tends to permeate SOMA and South Bay. CONTACT INFORMATION: This is a full-time, permanent position based in Corte Madera, CA. With a small team, we can be generous with equity. We also offer full benefits including health, 401(k), and more. We strongly prefer candidates who already live in the SF Bay Area, but w...

...l not be > sufficient reason to leave. As with the code, llvm will still have the > best license and if the only community change was the handling of the > license change I would probably keep going. > > The community change I cannot take is how the social injustice > movement has permeated it. When I joined llvm no one asked or cared > about my religion or political view. We all seemed committed to just > writing a good compiler framework. > > Somewhat recently a code of conduct was adopted. It says that the > community tries to welcome people of all "political...

...ost each 3D instruction requires to permuate its > operands. For example: > > // Each register is a 4-component vector > // the names of the components are x, y, z, w > add r0.xy, r1.zxyw, r2.yyyy > > The components of r1 and r2 and permuted before the addition, but the > permeation result is _not_ written backed to r1 and r2. 'zxyw' and > 'yyyy' are the permutation patterns (they are called 'swizzle'). Yup. This is a matter of folding the permute into the add instruction as part of instruction selection. > 'xy' is called the write...

...That, by itself, would not be > sufficient reason to leave. llvm still seems better than the > competition and lld itself is still awesome. True to all big projects and we both knew this would happen. :) > The community change I cannot take is how the social injustice > movement has permeated it. When I joined llvm no one asked or cared > about my religion or political view. We all seemed committed to just > writing a good compiler framework. You'll see that this is not an LLVM trend, but a world wide trend and that's not a bad thing. It is, and I wholeheartedly agree,...

...er than that--independent scenes try in vain to exclude the masses from ruining their little parties, and technology firms and record companies sign exclusive deals with each other. In this day and age, it's impossible--and even counterproductive--to continue the exclusionary mentality that has permeated the record industry up to this point. There are too many new approaches being taken to limit music distribution to just one method. Likewise, it no longer makes sense to exclude fans from accessing music the music they want, since they're going to get what they want whether or not the labels...

...the office in > peace to work on making the project better, or attend a conference where > some unkown lunatic could attack you for transgressing an irrelevant policy? > > > Rafael writes: > > The community change I cannot take is how the social injustice > > movement has permeated it. When I joined llvm no one asked or cared > > about my religion or political view. We all seemed committed to just > > writing a good compiler framework. > > Renato writes: > > You'll see that this is not an LLVM trend, but a world wide trend and > > that'...

...e your energy to, stay home/at the office in peace to work on making the project better, or attend a conference where some unkown lunatic could attack you for transgressing an irrelevant policy? Rafael writes: > The community change I cannot take is how the social injustice > movement has permeated it. When I joined llvm no one asked or cared > about my religion or political view. We all seemed committed to just > writing a good compiler framework. Renato writes: > You'll see that this is not an LLVM trend, but a world wide trend and > that's not a bad thing. Renato,...

...home/at the office in peace to work on making the project better, or attend a conference where some unkown lunatic could attack you for transgressing an irrelevant policy? > > > Rafael writes: > > The community change I cannot take is how the social injustice > > movement has permeated it. When I joined llvm no one asked or cared > > about my religion or political view. We all seemed committed to just > > writing a good compiler framework. > > Renato writes: > > You'll see that this is not an LLVM trend, but a world wide trend and > > that'...