search for: perlbal

...dapted to this usage (lots of user uploaded files). I wonder if someone has already worked on an integration of MogileFS into Mongrel (and Rails app) for serving the files ? If not, I think of writing a handler that would act as a bridge between the MogileFS keys and the actual files. I could use Perlbal from Danga but it involves a new technology (Perl) and a new setup. What do you think about this ? Thanks for all, Philippe

Hi, It seems that webrick cannot handle too much client and that luke is making mongrel the ''default'' server to use so i wanted to switch to mongrel. Then i read that i cannot use directly mongrel like webrick because it does not speak SSL. So my issue is : how to be sure things stay secure in the way that the proxy should be the one speaking ssl and making client ssl

...I''m finally going to sit down with a few of the guys and do an even comparison between some stuff proxying to mongrel (we ourselves typically use Big-IP or Zeus to Apache 2.2 to mongrels). If you have other pieces of software that you know about beyond, can you please let me know? Perlbal Pound Pen HA-Proxy Nginx TCPBalance Balance Balance NG TCPFork Apache 2.2 Litespeed Lighttpd Zeus load balancer Zeus High-performance traffic manager BIG-IP 6400 http://joyeur.com/2006/08/29/evaluating-proxy-engines-and-load- balancers-for-mongrel-driven-ruby-on-rails-applications-an- introducti...

We have been searching for a Rails deployment architecture which works for us for some time. We''ve recently moved from Apache 1.3 + FastCGI to Apache 2.2 + mod_proxy_balancer + mongrel_cluster, and it''s a significant improvement. But it still exhibits serious performance problems. We have the beginnings of a fix that we would like to share. To illustrate the problem, imagine a

Hello, I''m running a Rails application which must sort and manipulate a lot of data which are loaded in memory. The Rails app runs on 2 mongrel processes. When I first load the app, both are 32Mb in memory. After some days, both are between 200Mb and 300Mb. My question is : is there some kind of garbage collector in Mongrel? I never see the two Mongrel processes memory footprint