Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "periphonics".
Did you mean:
periphonic
2005 Nov 10
0
Ogg audio surround-sound
This came out of the OggPCM discussion, but I think it needs to be addressed on
a wider scale.
Let's start here, 5 years ago..
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis-dev/2000-July/009513.html
(I included this email, below)
I emailed David (author of that email) and asked him to join this list.
I'm thinking, as I look at the problem, that surround sound needs to be defined
_outside_
2000 Jul 11
0
True surround sound for Ogg -- a proposal (fwd)
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 14:51:12 +0100 (BST)
From: DG Malham <dgm2@york.ac.uk>
To: vorbis-dev@xiph.org
Cc: DG Malham <dgm2@york.ac.uk>, Rob Fletcher <rpf1@york.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [vorbis-dev] True surround sound for Ogg -- a proposal (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.3.95L.1000710092216.9043693B-100000@turpin.york.ac.uk>
Message-ID:
2005 Nov 18
2
OggPCM2: channel map
> I that this is handled pretty nicely by the "simple map" that Sampo
> suggested. This is basically the same thing as the "channel map"
> described on the wiki, but with the (physical,logical) channel pair
> swapped. So, using the syntax from the wiki:
> channel_type = OGG_CHANNEL_MAP_STEREO
> channel_map [OGG_CHANNEL_FRONT_LEFT] = 1
> channel_map
2000 Jul 07
2
True surround sound for Ogg -- a proposal
Hi everyone,
Over the last two weeks or so, I've been thinking about how to add surround
sound to Ogg -- and more than that, to do it in the best way possible. With
this in mind, I started considering using Ambisonic surround sound. The
advantages of this format are considerable:
a) It was developed in the early to mid '70s, so the patents should
be expired by now.
2005 Nov 19
0
OggPCM2: channel map
On 2005-11-19, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> Not sure this is a good idea. Remember that channel_map is just an
> array (unless you want to make it a map?). So if you had a
> OGG_CHANNEL_SPECIAL with an id of 1000, it would force 1000 entries in
> the array.
True, but remember that the channel map type implied the number of
entries in the table, and also that in this organization
1999 Jan 08
0
Subject: smb.conf information request
...home directories to 'chmod 750'
Note that there are no changes to the smb.conf file. Also; 6 months down the line, when management
discovers exactly what the implications of relaxed security is you will be in good shape to fix it :)
- Jim Mulholland
Principal Systems Administrator
Periphonics Corporation
jim.mulholland@peri.com
2009 Oct 05
1
(Universal) Ambisonic implementation
On Oct 4, 2009, at 16:48, James Cloos wrote:
> I always thought that the best way to put ambisonic media in flac
> was to
> use an ogg container, with the 0-order w channel in one flac
> stream, the
> three first-order channels in a second flac stream, the five second-
> order
> channels in a third flac stream and the seven third-order channels
> in a
> forth flac
2000 Feb 25
3
problems upgrading to samba 2.0.5a
I previously had an older version of Samba installed with the following
smb.conf:
; Make sure and restart the server after making changes to this file, ex:
; /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb stop
; /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb start
[global]
; Uncomment this if you want a guest account
guest account = nobody
log file = /var/log/samba-log.%m
lock directory = /var/lock/samba
share modes = yes
2005 Nov 19
2
OggPCM2: channel map
> True, but remember that the channel map type implied the number of
> entries in the table, and also that in this organization you'll always
> number the logical channels consequtively since each logical channel
> indeed corresponds to an index into the array. If the channel map type
> says it's a map for 5.1, there will only be 6 slots in the table no
> matter how
1999 Oct 21
6
Corrupted Excel files, oplock_break(905) errors
Hi there everyone!
I'm using Samba 2.0.5a-19990721 on a RedHat 6.0 machine with Linux kernel
2.2.12. My system generally works fine, however recently I've had some
complaints about some files being corrupted. The latest and best-handled
to enable a debugging happened at around the same time. Both clients were
using Windows95 OSR2 machines with Excel 97 SP-2. Two users reported the
problem