search for: periphon

...mat are considerable: a) It was developed in the early to mid '70s, so the patents should be expired by now. b) It's scalable -- it can handle everything from mono, to stereo, full horizontal surround, or full 360-degree spherical surround (periphonic). c) It's based on a sound mathematical foundation (unlike Dolby's 5.1 system), allowing you to calculate how it should be able to perform. d) Depending on how many channels you are willing to use (and the source of your material) you can...

...mat are considerable: > > a) It was developed in the early to mid '70s, so the patents should > be expired by now. > > b) It's scalable -- it can handle everything from mono, to stereo, > full horizontal surround, or full 360-degree spherical surround > (periphonic). > > c) It's based on a sound mathematical foundation (unlike Dolby's > 5.1 system), allowing you to calculate how it should be able > to perform. > > d) Depending on how many channels you are willing to use (and the > source of your material) you can...

> I that this is handled pretty nicely by the "simple map" that Sampo > suggested. This is basically the same thing as the "channel map" > described on the wiki, but with the (physical,logical) channel pair > swapped. So, using the syntax from the wiki: > channel_type = OGG_CHANNEL_MAP_STEREO > channel_map [OGG_CHANNEL_FRONT_LEFT] = 1 > channel_map

...mat are considerable: a) It was developed in the early to mid '70s, so the patents should be expired by now. b) It's scalable -- it can handle everything from mono, to stereo, full horizontal surround, or full 360-degree spherical surround (periphonic). c) It's based on a sound mathematical foundation (unlike Dolby's 5.1 system), allowing you to calculate how it should be able to perform. d) Depending on how many channels you are willing to use (and the source of your material) you can...

...situation you worry about could come about. If we forget fancy research stuff like high WFS (upto 192 channels, the last I heard; OTOH this means 255 channels might not be enough for everything) the broadest types I've heard of are Tomlinson Holman's 10.2 (12 channels) and third order periphonic ambisonic (16 channels), so I don't think this will present an issue any time soon. Similarly, it is an easily detectable encoding fault if any of the indices stored in the table exceed the number of channels in a frame, stored in the preceding codec setup header, so we won't be bumpi...

...home directories to 'chmod 750' Note that there are no changes to the smb.conf file. Also; 6 months down the line, when management discovers exactly what the implications of relaxed security is you will be in good shape to fix it :) - Jim Mulholland Principal Systems Administrator Periphonics Corporation jim.mulholland@peri.com

On Oct 4, 2009, at 16:48, James Cloos wrote: > I always thought that the best way to put ambisonic media in flac > was to > use an ogg container, with the 0-order w channel in one flac > stream, the > three first-order channels in a second flac stream, the five second- > order > channels in a third flac stream and the seven third-order channels > in a > forth flac

I previously had an older version of Samba installed with the following smb.conf: ; Make sure and restart the server after making changes to this file, ex: ; /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb stop ; /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb start [global] ; Uncomment this if you want a guest account guest account = nobody log file = /var/log/samba-log.%m lock directory = /var/lock/samba share modes = yes

...y about could come about. If we forget fancy research > stuff like high WFS (upto 192 channels, the last I heard; OTOH this > means 255 channels might not be enough for everything) the broadest > types I've heard of are Tomlinson Holman's 10.2 (12 channels) and third > order periphonic ambisonic (16 channels), so I don't think this will > present an issue any time soon. Unless I've missed someone, doesn't all this add to the size of the map even for mappings you don't use? Is seems like the whole thing would be a bit hard to extend, no? Anybody else here ha...

Hi there everyone! I'm using Samba 2.0.5a-19990721 on a RedHat 6.0 machine with Linux kernel 2.2.12. My system generally works fine, however recently I've had some complaints about some files being corrupted. The latest and best-handled to enable a debugging happened at around the same time. Both clients were using Windows95 OSR2 machines with Excel 97 SP-2. Two users reported the problem