Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "performandcombin".
Did you mean:
performandcombine
2015 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
Which BTQ? There are three flavors.
BTQ reg/reg
BTQ reg/mem
BTQ reg/imm
I can imagine that the reg/reg and especially the reg/mem versions would be
slow. However the shrq/and versions *with the same operands* would be slow
as well. There's even a compiler comment about the reg/mem version saying
"this is for disassembly only".
But I doubt BTQ reg/imm would be microcoded.
--
Ite
2015 Jan 19
6
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
I'm tracking down an X86 code generation malfeasance regarding BT (bit
test) and I have some questions.
This IR *matches* and then *X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT **is called:*
%and = and i64 %shl, %val * ; (val & (1 << index)) != 0 ; *bit test
with a *register* index
This IR *does not match* and so *X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT **is not
called:*
%and = lshr i64 %val, 25