Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "performancs".
Did you mean:
performance
2003 Oct 09
1
2.2.5 performanc issues...
We are trying to troubleshoot slow performance.
A lot of my NT client log files show messages like this about oplock
break issues.
[2003/10/09 12:50:39, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(1008)
request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to
pid 2907 on port 61752 for dev = 40240002, inode = 29, file_id = 2
64
[2003/10/09 12:51:03, 0] smbd/oplock.c:(395)
process_local_message:
2007 Nov 30
3
Zimbra benchmarking
Now that I have a working kvm setup, I thought I'd finally try how
Zimbra works. This is mainly some microbenchmarking, so it may not have
much to do with actual performance in real life.
Setup:
- 1GB memory given to kvm (from host's 2GB)
- Intel Core 2 6600 (kvm uses only one CPU)
- CentOS 5
- 15GB qcow2 image on XFS filesystem
- Zimbra 5.0 RC2 RHEL5 x86_64
- Dovecot latest hg,
2009 Apr 12
2
Performance difference of running Linux in PV or FV mode?
Hey,
I have installed Ubuntu 8.10 with FV mode.
I use this server for web server (command line mode only, no X window)
So should I hack my current installation into a PV mode for production use?
In fact, any min. performanc gain suppose I should get? (Any bechmark?)
Thanks.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@lists.xensource.com
2012 Jun 23
1
pop3-throttle
Hello
I am having a hard time with users using POP while leaving mailboxes
of several gigabyte cumulated. This causes a lot of disk I/O and kills
performancs for everyone. I try to encourage people migrating to
IMAP, but that migration will take some time, and therefore I am looking
for alterantive ways to workaround the problem.
I found pop3-throttle-plugin.c, which seems a smart way to solve the
problem, unfortunately it comes with no documentation...
2016 Jan 27
1
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 04:47:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> So you need to build a different kernel for some types of MIPS systems?
Yes. We can't really do without. Classic MIPS code is not relocatable
without the complexity of PIC code as used by ELF DSOs - and their
performanc penalty. Plus we have a number of architecture revisions
ovr the decades, big and little endian, 32
2016 Jan 27
1
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 04:47:53PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> So you need to build a different kernel for some types of MIPS systems?
Yes. We can't really do without. Classic MIPS code is not relocatable
without the complexity of PIC code as used by ELF DSOs - and their
performanc penalty. Plus we have a number of architecture revisions
ovr the decades, big and little endian, 32
2007 Mar 18
0
Performance Tuning Mysql and how mongrel is effected
As a follow up from my previous post, I am pondering some changes to my env.
I read that with AR I should change the verification timeout to be
lower than the MySQL db Interactive_timeout. Now, I have done some
performancing tuning to mysql in LAMP env''s but not RoR. MySQL typical
set the default interactive_timeout to 8hrs (28800) this has bitten me
a few times with sleeping processess
2007 Oct 10
0
linksys spa3102 for faxing
Hi, I have been considering a purchase of the linksys spa3102 for a couple hours but I would like to know from someone here, wether this device will support faxing on my local asterisk server, I have had success sending and recieving faces with an x100p, and recall that in the old documentation, they mention that if I send/recieve faxes, that it all should be done on the local server for best
2000 Apr 12
1
Samba Speed Issues and Information
"Jeremiah Gowdy" <jgowdy@home.com> wrote:
| I've recently switched my company from a Windows NT fileserver to
| FreeBSD/Samba. It's working really great and I absolutely love Samba. The
| only reason I'm asking about speed issues and tweaking, is I heard someone
| say something about it that implied that there are tricks/tweaks you can do
| to increase the speed of
2004 Sep 17
1
Fwd: FreeBSD kernel buffer overflow
Can anyone provide more details about the posting below ?
>Mailing-List: contact bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
>List-Id: <bugtraq.list-id.securityfocus.com>
>List-Post: <mailto:bugtraq@securityfocus.com>
>List-Help: <mailto:bugtraq-help@securityfocus.com>
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:bugtraq-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
>List-Subscribe:
2001 Apr 17
1
fastest R platform: follow-up and summary
The following runs in an eyeblink on my 700Mhz Thinkpad T-20 (256 MB RAM)
with Windows NT:
var(matrix(rnorm(4000000),ncol=4,nrow=1000000))
This also has the virtue of being quite readable. You could allow an
arbitrary covariance matrix and mean vector and it increases the time
slightly, but still only about 5 seconds.
Regarding performance, having tons of RAM is crucial. My Windows NT and the
2016 Jan 14
3
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On 01/14/2016 02:55 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> OK, so it looks like Will was asking not about WRC+addr+addr, but instead
> about WRC+sync+addr.
(He actually asked twice about this and that too but skip this)
> I am guessing that the manual's "Older instructions which must be globally
> performed when the SYNC instruction completes" provides the equivalent
> of
2016 Jan 14
3
[v3,11/41] mips: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On 01/14/2016 02:55 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> OK, so it looks like Will was asking not about WRC+addr+addr, but instead
> about WRC+sync+addr.
(He actually asked twice about this and that too but skip this)
> I am guessing that the manual's "Older instructions which must be globally
> performed when the SYNC instruction completes" provides the equivalent
> of
2007 Nov 28
3
Centos 5.1 distro: How to upgrade 5.0 to 5.1 with yum??
Hi,
Redhat announced RHEL 5.1 on Nov 07, so hopefully
CentOS 5.1 will be ready shortly. But I get kind of
nervous of the arrival of 5.1.
My problem is: I have hundreds Centos 5.0 boxes just
finished installation and I will continue to install
and upgrade hundreds more in next few months. With the
arrival of Centos 5.1, I don't like to reinstall them
anymore but continuous upgrade instead
2005 Sep 14
4
XP Profile write ok, no read.
Hi,
I still have a problem with samba and profiles.
The profile is correctly written to the profile share.
but when i logon a other computer, logon takes ages..
and im unable to do anything registry is locked for example.
( see logs below )
when i copy the network profile to the local computer there
is no problem. ( because the local profile is used )
OS : Linux Kernel 2.6.11 ( custom build
2016 May 30
5
[GSoC 2016] Capture Tracking Improvements - BackgroundInformation
Hey Scott,
There has been quite a lot of research on capture tracking (aka escape
analysis) for Java and other dynamic languages.
See e.g.:
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/HotSpot/EscapeAnalysis
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/vm/performance-enhancements-7.html
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=320384.320386
Nuno
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Egerton via