search for: performancetun

...rname & IP info): dovecot/imap [someusername 123.456.789.012 UID SEARCH] The server in question is running with Maildirs on top of an XFS filesystem. Is there anything I can do to optimize "UID SEARCH" or find out why it's being a problem? I've read https://wiki2.dovecot.org/PerformanceTuning and the linked pages. By "being a problem" I mean iostat -xmt 1 /dev/diskdevice shows 100% utilization for long periods and in some cases io service times are taking many seconds... which causes thunderbird to timeout when doing things like appending messages to user "Sent"...

...ll depend on your backends, method mostly) > 3. Dovecot master process (spawning mail processes) > > The later is a single-threaded process, so it will benefit from a faster > CPU core. > It can be dramatically improved by enabling process re-usage, see: > http://wiki.dovecot.org/PerformanceTuning > > However that also means more memory usage. > > > > Christian > >> >> thanks >> rajesh >> > > [snip] > -- > Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer > chibi at gol.com Global OnLine Japan/Rakuten C...

...de) 2. Auth processes (that will depend on your backends, method mostly) 3. Dovecot master process (spawning mail processes) The later is a single-threaded process, so it will benefit from a faster CPU core. It can be dramatically improved by enabling process re-usage, see: http://wiki.dovecot.org/PerformanceTuning However that also means more memory usage. Christian > > thanks > rajesh > [snip] -- Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer chibi at gol.com Global OnLine Japan/Rakuten Communications http://www.gol.com/ thanks christian during peak times here...

...s. A good idea is to have > as much of your clients hibernating as possible, as the hibernation > process is much smaller than actual IMAP process. > > You should probably also look at reusing the processes, as this will > probably help your performance, > https://wiki.dovecot.org/PerformanceTuning and > https://wiki.dovecot.org/LoginProcess are probably a good starting > point, although I suspect you've read these already. > > If you are running a dense server, cranking up various limits is rather > expected. > > Aki >

Hello, as some may remember, we're running very dense IMAP cluster here, in excess of 50k IMAP sessions per node (current record holder is 68k, design is for 200k+). The first issue we ran into was that the dovecot master process (which is single thread and thus a bottleneck) was approaching 100% CPU usage (aka using a full core) when trying to spawn off new IMAP processes. This was

hi all We have an ocfs2 cluster compose of 4 Debian lenny serveurs wich have access to an ISCSI LUN we have create a partition on this Lun and formated this partition as OCFS2. 2 serveurs does mail delivery (SMTP) and the two other are pop/imap servers. The smtp servers use dovecot LDA to deliver to mailboxes. La version de dovecot is 1.2.13, ldirectord balance conexion to the

...de) 2. Auth processes (that will depend on your backends, method mostly) 3. Dovecot master process (spawning mail processes) The later is a single-threaded process, so it will benefit from a faster CPU core. It can be dramatically improved by enabling process re-usage, see: http://wiki.dovecot.org/PerformanceTuning However that also means more memory usage. Christian > > thanks > rajesh > [snip] -- Christian Balzer Network/Systems Engineer chibi at gol.com Global OnLine Japan/Rakuten Communications http://www.gol.com/

...omeusername 123.456.789.012 UID SEARCH] > > The server in question is running with Maildirs on top of an XFS > filesystem. Is there anything I can do to optimize "UID SEARCH" or > find > out why it's being a problem? I've read > https://wiki2.dovecot.org/PerformanceTuning and the linked pages. > > By "being a problem" I mean iostat -xmt 1 /dev/diskdevice shows > 100% > utilization for long periods and in some cases io service times are > > taking many seconds... which causes thunderbird to timeout when > doing > things...

Hello, How can i fine tune dovecot for less then 10 users? or is there no need? Also, is there any smtp client which can be used with it for a open-source standalone server? i want very-small foot print+secure server, qmail and sendmail are dinos, and i felt xmail is trying to do everything. (as we are less then 10 users here.) i liked round-cube for webmail. i would appreciate all suggestions

...; We are having severals problems from "cpu stuck for 61 seconds" to > "too many connexion". I don't know what either of those errors mean. In any case you should switch to high-performance login processes: http://wiki.dovecot.org/LoginProcess http://wiki.dovecot.org/PerformanceTuning has more stuff

...using it in larger deployments. A good idea is to have as much of your clients hibernating as possible, as the hibernation process is much smaller than actual IMAP process. You should probably also look at reusing the processes, as this will probably help your performance, https://wiki.dovecot.org/PerformanceTuning and https://wiki.dovecot.org/LoginProcess are probably a good starting point, although I suspect you've read these already. If you are running a dense server, cranking up various limits is rather expected. Aki

...gt;> 3. Dovecot master process (spawning mail processes) >>> >>> The later is a single-threaded process, so it will benefit from a faster >>> CPU core. >>> It can be dramatically improved by enabling process re-usage, see: >>> http://wiki.dovecot.org/PerformanceTuning >>> >>> However that also means more memory usage. >>> >>> >>> >>> Christian >>> >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> rajesh >>>> >>> >>> [snip] >>> -- >>>...

Hi, We are building a new system that will support a large number of users (high volume, high concurrent usage, etc).? We have played with Dovecot, but in most serious applications we have traditionally used Courier IMAP.? It's my (lay) understanding that with indexing and perhaps other things in Dovecot, it might perform better than Courier in larger environments like this.? Am I correct or

I now have Dovecot in production and things are apparently trouble-free. The one known problem is that initial client inbox load can take 30 seconds - 2 minutes. For instance: 'I got fed up waiting and went and got coffee'...this with a 3MB mbox inbox...and my mail server is a substantial machine consuming 25% CPU just for this person's IMAP session. I realize that a certain

...thod mostly) > > 3. Dovecot master process (spawning mail processes) > > > > The later is a single-threaded process, so it will benefit from a faster > > CPU core. > > It can be dramatically improved by enabling process re-usage, see: > > http://wiki.dovecot.org/PerformanceTuning > > > > However that also means more memory usage. > > > > > > > > Christian > > > >> > >> thanks > >> rajesh > >> > > > > [snip] > > -- > > Christian Balzer Network/Systems...

I've been testing Dovecot for a while now and am preparing to replace our outdated IMAP system with it. The current system serves about 300 email users who run a mixture of clients (Eudora, Apple Mail, Thunderbird and Outlook). Can any of the many experts on this list answer a few questions: 1) What's the latest stable release of Dovecot I should be running on this new system

...> as much of your clients hibernating as possible, as the hibernation > > process is much smaller than actual IMAP process. > > > > You should probably also look at reusing the processes, as this will > > probably help your performance, > > https://wiki.dovecot.org/PerformanceTuning and > > https://wiki.dovecot.org/LoginProcess are probably a good starting > > point, although I suspect you've read these already. > > > > If you are running a dense server, cranking up various limits is rather > > expected. > > > > Aki > >...

Thanks, they are as in example, except for "mailbox_list_index = yes" witch is from https://wiki.dovecot.org/PerformanceTuning On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:18 PM Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > You should review https://wiki2.dovecot.org/NFS to see that the settings > make sense. > > Aki > On 14.11.2018 12.00, Adrian M wrote: > > Thank you ! > I was little concerned that...

hello could somebody with experience let me know the dovecot config file settings to handle around 1500 simultaneous connections over pop3 and 1500 connection over imap simultaneously. my server server configuration hex core processor, 16 gb ram 1 X 600 gb 15 k rpm for main drive and 2 X 2000 gb hdd for data (No raid) thanks rajesh my current config file settings as such # 2.2.7:

...d } Note: we're using Maildir and the usual "works for me(c), may not work for everyone" applies. -- Adi Pircalabu On 2018-11-14 21:47, Adrian M wrote: > Thanks, they are as in example, except for "mailbox_list_index = yes" > witch is from https://wiki.dovecot.org/PerformanceTuning > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:18 PM Aki Tuomi > <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote: > >> You should review https://wiki2.dovecot.org/NFS to see that the >> settings make sense. >> >> Aki >> On 14.11.2018 12.00, Adrian M wrote: >> >...