search for: performance_tuning

...re virtual machine, so I can easely configure this. I noticed also in some Samba configurations, parameter socket options is set with TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=819 Does it worth still setting this parameter on recent linux system ? According to the wiki https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Performance_Tuning : "The Samba team highly-recommends not setting the parameters described in this section without understanding the technical background and knowing the consequences. In most environments, setting these parameters or changing the defaults decreases the Samba network performance." Best...

...5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 112 MBytes 94.3 Mbits/sec So I think that only samba 4 can be problem in this configuration. How to increase samba 4 fileserver perfomance? In internet people say to modify socket options but https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Performance_Tuning says no to do it? How to solve problem of such poor perfomance?

...mmendations about Samba 4.7.1 ? For few informations : 2vCPUs / 1 Core 8Go of RAM 140 simultaneous Windows users / 250 at most 20 NFS shares mounted via fstab This question because my RAM is all eated up in the buffer/cache (normal according to last chapter of : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Performance_Tuning). Users are not complaining but I don't know if the servers is needing more or less. Any advice will be greatly appreciated, thanks. *Geoffrey MEZERETTE* • Ingénieur Systèmes et Réseaux • Enovea • 16, rue Jacques Monod • 76130 Mont Saint Aignan • Standard +33 (0) 2 32 18 82 66 • geoffrey.mez...

...se the Samba machine. > > I noticed also in some Samba configurations, parameter socket options > is set with TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=819 > Does it worth still setting this parameter on recent linux system ? > According to the wiki > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Performance_Tuning : "The Samba team > highly-recommends not setting the parameters described in this > section without understanding the technical background and knowing > the consequences. In most environments, setting these parameters or > changing the defaults decreases the Samba network performa...

Dear all: I used samba version 4.8.6 .I want to creat and write file in a dir,but the dir have a lots file ,may be 200000+.The creat or write will be slowly more than 1s. I watched the code ,the operation will be running the unix_convert .the function is time-consuming . if I modify the code get_real_filename_full_scan in the filename.c .the client will be failed to find some file .but the write

Hi, I have come across something similar. We had a large directory (several 10s of thousand files) stored on a large Linux box which was migrated to a faster, but smaller memory (256 GiB -> 12 GiB) box. The Windows users recorded unacceptable access times and ultimately we had to: 1) Break the large directory into several smaller ones, and 2) Move to a larger memory (128 Gib) machine.

...use the Samba machine. > > I noticed also in some Samba configurations, parameter socket options > is set with TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=819 > Does it worth still setting this parameter on recent linux system ? > According to the wiki > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Performance_Tuning : "The Samba team > highly-recommends not setting the parameters described in this > section without understanding the technical background and knowing > the consequences. In most environments, setting these parameters or > changing the defaults decreases the Samba network performa...

Hello, I'm a bit desperate so I'm trying to seek help here. Many year ago, I built myself 2 file servers (5 disks enclosure for data, 2 disks enclosure for the OS) on a computer. It was running on Debian 7.11 for years without an issue and I was getting 75MB/95MB when transferring file from it to a Windows client, all having a 1gbs network card. https://i.ibb.co/N618Z4W/Debian-7.png