search for: performaces

Hi all: I've written a function and saved the worksapce.When the workspace of my function is re-open,I want display some introduction or step by step guidance of the function for the users.How can I do it? Thanks a lot! My best regards!

Hello, I'm running Asterisk on a CentOS 64-bit server. . Asterisk if I compile using the ./configure --libdir=/usr/lib64 instead of ./configure have a relative gain performace.? Has anyone done any comparison? Is there any way in the compilation or even in settings that I can improve the performace of the asterisk? tks Eduardo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Hi forks: I've been testing SMB2 with samba 3.6.4 performance these days, and I find a weird benchmark that SMB2 write performance is slower than SMB1 in 10Gb ethernet network. Server ----------------------- Linux: Redhat Enterprise 6.1 x64 Kernel: 2.6.31 x86_64 Samba: 3.6.4 (almost using the default configuration) Network: Chelsio T4 T420-SO-CR 10GbE network adapter RAID: Adaptec 51645 RAID

Hello! Our company have 2 sun 7110 with the following configuration: Primary: 7110 with 2 qc 1.9ghz HE opterons and 32GB ram 16 2.5" 10Krpm sas disc (2 system, 1 spare) a pool is configured from the rest so we have 13 active working discs in raidz-2 (called main) there is a sun J4200 jbod connected to this device with 12x750GB discs with 1 spare and 11active discs there is another pool

On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Carlos Garces <carlos.garces at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > > I have some strange results on my test with nouveau drivers > > I'm using a old GeForce4 MX 4000 (NV18) with 128 MB. > > I have made 2 test. > > -The default configuration, using nomodeset without nouveau_vieux_dri.so > > $inxi -G > Graphics: Card: NVIDIA NV18

Hi! I have some strange results on my test with nouveau drivers I'm using a old GeForce4 MX 4000 (NV18) with 128 MB. I have made 2 test. -The default configuration, using nomodeset without nouveau_vieux_dri.so $inxi -G Graphics: Card: NVIDIA NV18 [GeForce4 MX 4000] X.Org: 1.12.4 drivers: vesa,nouveau (unloaded: fbdev) Resolution: 1024x768 at 0.0hz GLX Renderer: N/A

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 04:18:08PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote: > cmpxchg_release is light-wight than cmpxchg, we can gain a better > performace then. On some arch like ppc, barrier impact the performace > too much. > > Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng at gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan at linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- >

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 04:18:08PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote: > cmpxchg_release is light-wight than cmpxchg, we can gain a better > performace then. On some arch like ppc, barrier impact the performace > too much. > > Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng at gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan at linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- >

Hello, I have 2 dual CPU Xeon 3Ghz HT enabled Linux routers and each one of them serving 2 class C with pick traffic on router about 300Mbit full duplex 2 x Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82546GB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 03) 1GB ram And 2 x Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5703 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) 1GB ram Both routers have about 600

Hi Xen Users, I''d like to run some performance tests with Xen. Are there some (sort of) standard test-cases or tooling? I''m thinking about using the Linux Test Project''s "Database Opensource Test Suite" (http://ltp.sourceforge.net) Does someone have any experience with this? Other recommendations? Thanks. Regards, Gábor

After update the system now I use: Kernel 3.9.2 x server 1.12.4 nouveau 1.0.7 the xorg config are at: http://pastebin.com/2LUxLiVs It's the one installed by my distro, without any modification I have made 2 test. Normal boot Xorg at http://pastebin.com/reZdAXEF GLX Renderer is detected as GLX "Mesa DRI nv18 x86/MMX+/3DNow!+/SSE GLX" Same configuration with nomodeset Xorg log

Hello, I am interested in some management-performance issues: 1st Scenario: A management tool (for example a webbased one) has the following process: - write in database - read with script (for example perl) data from db and write conf files - reload asterisk I was reading around in the mailing lists and people say reloading is stable. Now this tool has to manage 1000 clients so the conf

Dear GlusterFS Engineer, I have questions that my glusterfs server and fuse client perform properly on below specification. It can write only *65MB*/s through FUSE client to 1 glusterfs server (1 brick and no replica for 1 volume ) - NW bandwidth are enough for now. I've check it with iftop - However it can write *120MB*/s when I mount nfs on the same volume. Could anyone check if the

I have noticed a significant performance degradation using merge in 2.9.1 relative to 2.8.1. Here is what I observed: N <- 100000 X <- data.frame(group=rep(12:1, each=N), mon=rep(rev(month.abb), each=N)) X$mon <- as.character(X$mon) Y <- data.frame(mon=month.abb, letter=letters[1:12]) Y$mon <- as.character(Y$mon) Z <- cbind(Y, group=1:12) system.time(Out

Dear gluster experts, We have encountered a severe performance issue related to quota feature of gluster. My underlying fs is lvm with xfs format. The problem is if quota is enabled the io performance is about 26MB/s but with quota disabled the io performance is 216MB/s. Any one known what's the problem? BTW I have reproduce it several times and it is related to quota indeed. Here's the

I've got an odd situation that I need some advise on. I have two computers that I am planning to use as a cluster. I initially started with some left over Compaq Presairos with 667MHz CPUs. I loaded CentOS 4.3 and later updated to 4.4. Things ran normally, albeit slowly. I had an opportunity to upgrade to a pair of IBM Netvistas with 2.26 GHz CPUs, I did this by transferring the

Hi all, I was wonder what experiences there are out there with using RAID-X for performance increases. I do use RAID-1 (2 disks) but am interested in attemtps to gain higher R/W performance. Do the RAID-5's etc give noticeable performace increases? A significant help for me was using ccache for compiling programs. That was a real performance increase. Thanks for any suggestions/opinions.

Hi, please help... In controller... def index @customers = Customer.find(:all) pagination code here.... end In index.html.erb Displayes list of customers and has pagination 1,2,3,4...etc. On clicking page 2, it will again run this(Customer.find(:all)) query in controller. So, there will be lack of performance. So, how to increase the mysql performace? Can i use the index as below or any

Hi, I am a Masters student from Carnegie Mellon University. I am looking for a research topics for an Advanced OS & DS course we have. I wanted to know what is the current support for NUMA on Xen ? Does it support the IBM x440 and AMD64 Opteron ? Also, does the Xen scheduler do NUMA aware scheduling so it does not degrade the VM performace ? My group is currently looking into Scheduling

Has anyone else noticed a significant zfs performance deterioration when running recent opensolaris bits? My 32-bit / 768 MB Toshiba Tecra S1 notebook was able to do a full opensolaris release build in ~ 4 hours 45 minutes (gcc shadow compilation disabled; using an lzjb compressed zpool / zfs on a single notebook hdd p-ata drive). After upgrading to 2007-05-25 opensolaris release bits