search for: performace

Hi all: I've written a function and saved the worksapce.When the workspace of my function is re-open,I want display some introduction or step by step guidance of the function for the users.How can I do it? Thanks a lot! My best regards!

Hello, I'm running Asterisk on a CentOS 64-bit server. . Asterisk if I compile using the ./configure --libdir=/usr/lib64 instead of ./configure have a relative gain performace.? Has anyone done any comparison? Is there any way in the compilation or even in settings that I can improve the performace of the asterisk? tks Eduardo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachment...

...to "SMB2" in smb.conf to enable SMB2, other configs in smb.conf are not changed, restart samba, reconnect in Windows 2008, use Iometer to run test again, I got 470 MB/s write performance and 505 MB/s read performance. It's quite good that read performance bursts with SMB2, but write performace droped by 140 MB/s, I run this write test serveral times again, write performance indeed droped a lot, so is it normal that SMB2 write performance is slower than SMB1? Thanks ^_^ Regards Uranus Zhou

...the discs aand other hardware are working properely. Zil is turned off, system is set to assync. the firmware version is fishworks 2010.Q3.2.0. The purpose of the system is to proveide NFSv3 shares for our mini-cloud The system is mission critical. Our problem is, that both devices experience low performace, and high latency (up to 1.5sec on some operations) due to heavy cacheing the main storage-s full input+output bandwitch is about 5MB/sec with ~2000 op/sec from NFSv3 (1950 metadata cache hit/sec, 350 data hit/sec 50 data miss/sec) The very strange thing is: we have very high rates at disc percent...

...; The results are strange for me. I expect better performance on > "optimized" configuration but some test using Cairo are very bad (0,54 > vs 5,38). > > The test are available at > http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1306076-UT-2DGPUTEST63 > > Any idea to improve the performace of NV18? > Any know issue with nouveau_vieux_dri.so and NV18? It's a little difficult to tell anything without seeing your xorg.conf -- it seems like 1024x768 should work fine. You also appear to be in 16-bit mode, and using fairly old software (xorg 1.12, mesa 8.0, xf86-video-nouveau 1.0.1...

...log http://pastebin.com/2ZbMwyRK The results are strange for me. I expect better performance on "optimized" configuration but some test using Cairo are very bad (0,54 vs 5,38). The test are available at http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1306076-UT-2DGPUTEST63 Any idea to improve the performace of NV18? Any know issue with nouveau_vieux_dri.so and NV18?

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 04:18:08PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote: > cmpxchg_release is light-wight than cmpxchg, we can gain a better > performace then. On some arch like ppc, barrier impact the performace > too much. > > Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng at gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan at linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 in...

On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 04:18:08PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote: > cmpxchg_release is light-wight than cmpxchg, we can gain a better > performace then. On some arch like ppc, barrier impact the performace > too much. > > Suggested-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng at gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan at linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 in...

Hello, I have 2 dual CPU Xeon 3Ghz HT enabled Linux routers and each one of them serving 2 class C with pick traffic on router about 300Mbit full duplex 2 x Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82546GB Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 03) 1GB ram And 2 x Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5703 Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10) 1GB ram Both routers have about 600

Hi Xen Users, I''d like to run some performance tests with Xen. Are there some (sort of) standard test-cases or tooling? I''m thinking about using the Linux Test Project''s "Database Opensource Test Suite" (http://ltp.sourceforge.net) Does someone have any experience with this? Other recommendations? Thanks. Regards, Gábor

...r me. I expect better performance on >> "optimized" configuration but some test using Cairo are very bad (0,54 >> vs 5,38). >> >> The test are available at >> http://openbenchmarking.org/result/1306076-UT-2DGPUTEST63 >> >> Any idea to improve the performace of NV18? >> Any know issue with nouveau_vieux_dri.so and NV18? > > It's a little difficult to tell anything without seeing your xorg.conf > -- it seems like 1024x768 should work fine. You also appear to be in > 16-bit mode, and using fairly old software (xorg 1.12, mesa 8.0, &...

Hello, I am interested in some management-performance issues: 1st Scenario: A management tool (for example a webbased one) has the following process: - write in database - read with script (for example perl) data from db and write conf files - reload asterisk I was reading around in the mailing lists and people say reloading is stable. Now this tool has to manage 1000 clients so the conf

Dear GlusterFS Engineer, I have questions that my glusterfs server and fuse client perform properly on below specification. It can write only *65MB*/s through FUSE client to 1 glusterfs server (1 brick and no replica for 1 volume ) - NW bandwidth are enough for now. I've check it with iftop - However it can write *120MB*/s when I mount nfs on the same volume. Could anyone check if the

I have noticed a significant performance degradation using merge in 2.9.1 relative to 2.8.1. Here is what I observed: N <- 100000 X <- data.frame(group=rep(12:1, each=N), mon=rep(rev(month.abb), each=N)) X$mon <- as.character(X$mon) Y <- data.frame(mon=month.abb, letter=letters[1:12]) Y$mon <- as.character(Y$mon) Z <- cbind(Y, group=1:12) system.time(Out

Dear gluster experts, We have encountered a severe performance issue related to quota feature of gluster. My underlying fs is lvm with xfs format. The problem is if quota is enabled the io performance is about 26MB/s but with quota disabled the io performance is 216MB/s. Any one known what's the problem? BTW I have reproduce it several times and it is related to quota indeed. Here's the

I've got an odd situation that I need some advise on. I have two computers that I am planning to use as a cluster. I initially started with some left over Compaq Presairos with 667MHz CPUs. I loaded CentOS 4.3 and later updated to 4.4. Things ran normally, albeit slowly. I had an opportunity to upgrade to a pair of IBM Netvistas with 2.26 GHz CPUs, I did this by transferring the

Hi all, I was wonder what experiences there are out there with using RAID-X for performance increases. I do use RAID-1 (2 disks) but am interested in attemtps to gain higher R/W performance. Do the RAID-5's etc give noticeable performace increases? A significant help for me was using ccache for compiling programs. That was a real performance increase. Thanks for any suggestions/opinions. jerry

...omers = Customer.find(:all) pagination code here.... end In index.html.erb Displayes list of customers and has pagination 1,2,3,4...etc. On clicking page 2, it will again run this(Customer.find(:all)) query in controller. So, there will be lack of performance. So, how to increase the mysql performace? Can i use the index as below or any other way is there? ALTER TABLE customers ADD INDEX(customer_id); -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...ie Mellon University. I am looking for a research topics for an Advanced OS & DS course we have. I wanted to know what is the current support for NUMA on Xen ? Does it support the IBM x440 and AMD64 Opteron ? Also, does the Xen scheduler do NUMA aware scheduling so it does not degrade the VM performace ? My group is currently looking into Scheduling policies for NUMA systems for multiple VMs. Let me know if its already done in Xen. Thanks, Deepti Chheda _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

...source), the same release build now needs ~ 6 hours; that''s ~ 25% slower. I think a change that might be responsible for this is the fix for 6542676 "ARC needs to track meta-data memory overhead" (that is, less caching with the fix for 6542676). Has anyone noticed similar zfs performace deterioration? This message posted from opensolaris.org