search for: perforc

...bversion, arch, and > monotone are suitable for our purposes. But, we'd love to hear your > thoughts; especially if you have first-hand experience with these tools. Apart from using CVS as a client (as everyone does), I've only ever used Aegis (previous employer, for ~3 years) and Perforce (the employer before that, though ever since then I've been using the 'free' license for personal stuff.) I've tinkered a bit with some of the shiny new V-C systems. Well, to put things bluntly, Aegis was a complete and total disaster, while Perforce is the best version contro...

I have used Perforce also and fully agree it's wonderful. The only concern I have is with their license for open source projects. The only gotcha is that it must be renewed annually, and they reserve the right to not renew it (though they say they won't unreasonably deny renewals). Not sure how much thi...

LLVMers, The oversight group has been kicking around the idea of getting a better version control system than CVS. The problem is, we're not quite sure what "better" means. So, we thought we'd ask your opinions. If you're interested in this topic (and you should be if you're actively developing), please have a look at this site:

Hi Currently devs check code into perforce and we have to checkout > package > update repo > deploy I know this could be scripted but are there any tools out there that can take code from a repository and build rpm's in a continuous integration type manner? I have been hunting around for such a tool and so far not seeing...

On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 08:02:38PM -0800, Jeff Cohen wrote: > I have used Perforce also and fully agree it's wonderful. The only > concern I have is with their license for open source projects. The > only gotcha is that it must be renewed annually, and they reserve the > right to not renew it (though they say they won't unreasonably deny > renewals). Not s...

...n the world to change for others, I wonder if we shouldn't consider adopting a hybrid approach to source control, a la FreeBSD. There: - highly active developers bitten by CVS, - people working on particular, 'experimental' projects and - those who "just want to" ...use Perforce. For LLVM today, this might map to something like: - Reid ;) (though I'm sure he's not alone..) - a bunch of people using LLVM in interesting ways but not 'core' LLVM hackers, who nevertheless might like to see their stuff in the tree - (for example here:) Windows guys. (It...

...motivated to write GUIs than for svn). > > David And they almost always leave out big chunks of functionality that are important for several use cases. Basically, they figure out the commands needed for a small set of workflows, ensure the best case works, then stop there. Coming from a perforce and SVN background, I think this is understandable. With perforce and SVN, you just don't have as many options and possible workflows, so they tend to be a little easier to learn, and a lot easier to wrap in a UI on the client side. -- Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcom...

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 02:04:48PM -0800, Josh Coalson wrote: > --- Denis Chatelain <listes@octopodus.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > I just tried to compile libFLAC (using Borland C++ Builder 6 on > > Windows). > > > > The compilers yells at me on line 233 of libFLAC/lpc.c > > > > *(residual++) = *(data++) - (sum >>

...s running Fedora core 4. Reason for migrating to CentOS: no more security updates available, hardware change planned anyway. Here are the services to be migrated: sendmail pop (not sure which daemon, I think it is running the default daemon in RH9) DNS apache+PHP website FTP Dansguardian Samba Perforce Squid I haven't seen any directories like LDAP or windows Active Directory, so I assume for now that all authentication is done locally. Anyone has experience with that? I'm not too scared about sendmail, Bind, apache/PHP (except that maybe the PHP upgrade may break the website, but...

Hello All ! Recently I have upgraded NUT to 2.4.1, and now I can't monitor old IMV LanPro S3 UPS with old SNMP board. Previously it is monitored OK, but now snmp-ups refuses to start: [root at perforce /usr/local/etc/nut]# /usr/local/libexec/nut/snmp-ups -a lanproups -DDDDDDD Network UPS Tools - Generic SNMP UPS driver 0.44 (2.4.1) debug level is '7' SNMP UPS driver : entering upsdrv_initups() SNMP UPS driver : entering nut_snmp_init(snmp-ups, 192.9.100.149, v1, public) SNMP UPS driver...

...t no httpd service is, or will ever be, installed on that host. However, it seems a rather dangerous hole in the logical design of SELinux that one cannot explicitly remove and reassign contexts to ports. In order to accomplish this on a system running httpd but attached to non-standard ports one perforce is required to cross link permissions between all of the affected processes. Which I cannot conceive as a security enhancement. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www...

>> Considering that everyone is managing just fine with cvs, anything >> discussed about the differences between cvs and *X* is not a show stopper. > > I would have used the term "coping just fine" with cvs. Yeah, it works. > But, is it productive? efficient? easy? fast? .. none of those. There > are better alternatives and that's why we're discussing it.

...dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: execute_statement argv[4] = Dadis-MBP Dec 18 14:49:01 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: domain is rvx.is Dec 18 14:49:01 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: doing add Dec 18 14:49:02 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: update failed: NOTAUTH Dec 18 14:49:02 dc02.rvx.is named[332]: validating @0x6e5e4528: www.perforce.com A: no valid signature found Dec 18 14:49:02 dc02.rvx.is named[332]: validating @0x6dc28378: perforce.com A: no valid signature found Dec 18 14:49:02 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: update failed: NOTAUTH Dec 18 14:49:02 dc02.rvx.is logger[15810]: DHCP-DNS Update failed: 22 Dec 18 14:49:02 dc02.rvx.is...

...t of LLVM into the vendor branch in the FreeBSD tree and then merge it. It's quite easy for us to see any locally-applied diffs. Copying there from some LLVM-hosted svn branch wouldn't be any easier than copying there from trunk. David [1] We actually have a few forks of LLVM in various Perforce branches and git repositories with experimental features too, although most of those are intended to be merged upstream eventually.

...commit) just commit a big blob, losing the individual changes. With a distributed system, I could perform all of the standard operations (commits, diffs, etc) remotely, then apply all of teh change sets to the main repo when I get net access. >> 6. Authorization. Arch/Monotone/Subversion/Perforce all have fine >> grained authorization (permission) features. CVS does not. This means we >> can't say, "user xyz is given write access only in lib/System" .. we >> either give them write access to the whole repository (or a module) or >> not at all. > >...

...metadata !2, metadata !"f", metadata !"f", metadata !"f", metadata !2, i32 2, metadata !4, i1 false, i1 true, i32 0, i32 0, null, i1 false, i1 false} ; [ DW_TAG_subprogram ] !2 = metadata !{i32 524329, metadata !"testadd.c", metadata !"/home/asudarsanam/perforce/llvmtop/setup", metadata !3} ; [ DW_TAG_file_type ] !3 = metadata !{i32 524305, i32 0, i32 12, metadata !"testadd.c", metadata !".", metadata !"clang 2.0", i1 true, i1 false, metadata !"", i32 0} ; [ DW_TAG_compile_unit ] !4 = metadata !{i32 524309, met...

...; Dec 18 14:49:01 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: domain is rvx.is > > > Dec 18 14:49:01 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: doing add > > > Dec 18 14:49:02 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: update failed: NOTAUTH > > > Dec 18 14:49:02 dc02.rvx.is named[332]: validating @0x6e5e4528: > > > www.perforce.com A: no valid signature found > > > Dec 18 14:49:02 dc02.rvx.is named[332]: validating @0x6dc28378: > > > perforce.com A: no valid signature found > > > Dec 18 14:49:02 dc02.rvx.is dhcpd[318]: update failed: NOTAUTH > > > Dec 18 14:49:02 dc02.rvx.is logger[158...

...formix:x:34:informix=0A= game:x:40:=0A= xok:x:41:=0A= trusted:x:42:=0A= modem:x:43:=0A= named:x:44:named=0A= postfix:x:51:postfix=0A= dbmaker:x:52:=0A= fix:x:53:informix=0A= oinstall:x:54:=0A= dba:x:55:oracle=0A= localham:x:56:dpbox=0A= logmastr:x:57:=0A= codine:x:58:codadmin=0A= maildrop:x:59:=0A= perforce:x:60:perforce=0A= sapdb:x:61:sapdb=0A= users:x:100:=0A= nogroup:x:65534:root=0A= ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01C2BE05.940848C0 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="smb.conf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smb.conf&quo...

...2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #6: Sun Jun 3 04:17:59 EDT 2007 mwm at bhuda.mired.org:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/BHUDA amd64 And all the mailboxes are stored on ufs file systems. <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm at mired.org> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.

...quot;f", > metadata !"f", metadata !"f", metadata !2, i32 2, metadata !4, i1 > false, i1 true, i32 0, i32 0, null, i1 false, i1 false} ; [ > DW_TAG_subprogram ] > !2 = metadata !{i32 524329, metadata !"testadd.c", metadata > !"/home/asudarsanam/perforce/llvmtop/setup", metadata !3} ; [ > DW_TAG_file_type ] > !3 = metadata !{i32 524305, i32 0, i32 12, metadata !"testadd.c", > metadata !".", metadata !"clang 2.0", i1 true, i1 false, metadata !"", > i32 0} ; [ DW_TAG_compile_unit ] > !4 = m...