search for: perfomance

...--------------------------------------- [ 3] local b.b.b.b port 53459 connected with a.a.a.a port 5001 [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 112 MBytes 94.3 Mbits/sec So I think that only samba 4 can be problem in this configuration. How to increase samba 4 fileserver perfomance? In internet people say to modify socket options but https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Performance_Tuning says no to do it? How to solve problem of such poor perfomance?

Здравствуйте, xen-users. Just test domU IO perfomance: sda1 configure via phy:/dev/sdb1. Benchmark with dbench (dbench -D /usr/src -s 10 -t 120) - 102 Mb/s Native sistem (mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt && dbench -D /mnt -s 10 -t 120) - 140 Mb/s How i can speedup dbench? -- С уважением, Vitaliy mailto:vitaliy.okulov@gmail.c...

Hello, Am 03.05.2015 um 17:38 schrieb ????????? ????????: > Thank you for your time. What network did you test it? > 100Mb or 1000Mb? I'm using 1Gbit here at home. With a 100Mbit connection it wouldn't be possible to reach transfer rates of 110MB/Sec. A realistic good transfer rate for a 100Mbit connection is just around 11 MB/Sec. Regards, Marc

Hello Developers, I am considering using SPEEX on an embedded processor that does not have a floating point unit. Does anybody have a SPEEX performance characterization on a fixed point processor? More specifically, I am interested in knowing how the MFLOPS values from Table 9.2 in the manual translate to fixed-point instructions when SPEEX is compiled with enable-fixed-point option. Any help

...out 15 seconds !!! on modern Intel Core Duo computer. i=0; while(i<5000000) { i=i+1; } Using Visual Basic I can complete the same script (simple loop of 5000000 itterations) in 0.1 sec. Is it realy R not suitable for huge computing. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/R-perfomance-question-%21%21%21-tp17984154p17984154.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Hello, Am 03.05.2015 um 08:31 schrieb ????????? ????????: > Here my samba conf file: > > [global] > > workgroup = MYGROUP > server string = Samba Server Version %v > > interfaces = lo eth0 x.x.x.x/x #my ip and mask > hosts allow = 127. 10.0. > > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > > max log size = 50 > > security =

How big is difference between encoding speeds of libspeex compiled with arm-asm, and without it? My application is written in EVC++, but there is no inline assembler, so I have to compile speex without arm-asm. But I still trying to find a way to use speex with arm-asm under my EVC++ application. I tried to compile speex with arm-asm under gcc (arm-wince-pe), but generated static link

On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 10:15 -0500, tom abcd wrote: > I am using speex on a Philips LPC2138 Arm 7 processor and have hit two > compiler warnings when using FIXED_POINT and the Arm 4 asm code. > > In cb_search.c get a warning on the call to compute_weighted_codebook of: > "passing arg 2 of 'compute_weighted_codebook' from incompatible pointer type' OK, I forgot to

On Tue, 2006-01-24 at 10:33 -0500, tom abcd wrote: > > OK, I forgot to update the ARM4 code. That should definitely be fixed > > (otherwise it's not going to work). > > If this is not going to work then why does it work on my Arm? Any > quick fix I can do for now? Didn't you mention you were only using the decoder? That function is used in the encoder only. > is

Hi winegurus! I am quite new to wine. :( I have winehq latest stable release installed. My os is Ubuntu lucid. My hardware: core 2 duo 2.3ghz, graphic card nvidia 220 gt with 1g , board assus p5kpl am in, 1g ram My nvidia has proper drivers installed and recognized by x I installed bricscad v9 for windows without any problems. Tip: Bricscad seems to run quicker when I select nt 3.5 or 4.0 on

I've got the following performance-problem. Especially large copies from the server to the client take a very long time to compleet. How can that be? Why is that so slow? Much slower than the same action from a Windows server. I use Redhat 6.0 / Samba 2.0.5a and Win95 as a client. Does anybody knows a good reference for optimizing a Samba Server? Paul Rijke Truckland Amsterdam B.V.

Good afternoon. Performance problems when opening drawings Kompas V13/autocad 2010 with resource Samba. When simply copying speed 11.2MB / s. And to read and write to Samba. Next I mount resource Samba, as a network ROM for Windows 7 Pro x64. When opening a drawing for editing , there a large number of small requests . Kompas / autocad not cache the file, and read his blocks , often and quickly.

Hello all, When i finally managed to run Diablo3 game thru wine, it was working perfect. No stuttering at all. I've finished the Diablo3 on normal level and now i'm playing it again on nightmare level - but i doubt that's releated to my problem. Since few days when i run diablo via wine i get incredible stuttering, the game is nearly unplayable but _nothing_ changed in wine's

Hello! I''am setup zfs / cifs home storage server, end now have low performance with play movie stored on this zfs from windows client. server hardware is not new , but n windows it perfomance was normal. CPU is AMD Athlon Burton Thunderbird 2500, runing on 1,7GHz, 1024 RAM and storage: usb c4t0d0 ST332062-0A-3.AA-298.09GB /pci at 0,0/pci1458,5004 at 2,2/cdrom at 1/disk at 0,0 tagra err sil3114 c5d0 ST332062-9QF6EPB-0001-298.09GB /pci at 0,0/pci10de,6c at 8/pci-ide...

Here my samba conf file: [global] ??? workgroup = MYGROUP ?? ?server string = Samba Server Version %v ? ??? interfaces = lo eth0 x.x.x.x/x #my ip and mask ?? ?hosts allow = 127. 10.0. ??? log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m ?? ?max log size = 50 # ----------------------- Standalone Server Options ------------------------ ?? ?security = user ?? ?passdb backend = tdbsam #

Hi, I have both linux and solaris NIS client against a Solaris NIS Server, but my linux box are shamefully slow compare to solaris some sample: on Solaris 5.8: # ypwhich transporter02.domain.com # time id userid uid=36923(userid) gid=36923(u_036923) real 0.0 user 0.0 sys 0.0 on Linux: [root at linux]# ypwhich transporter02.domain.com [root at amsdc2-n-s04taw root]# time

Hi, We are running on 5.5 on a HP ProLiant DL360 G6. Kernel version is 2.6.18-194.17.1.el5 (we had also tested with the latest available kernel kernel-2.6.18-238.1.1.el5.x86_64) We running some performance tests using the "iperf" utility. We are seeing very bad and inconsistent performance on the UDP testing. The maximum we could get, was 440 Mbits/sec, and it varies from 250 to 440

Hi, we have 2 servers on centos5.2 in a cluster with the redhat cman in the configuration SERVER1 > LVM \ CMAN DRBD > XEN SERVER2 > LVM / For each xen we create a new local LVM on each node, put them in a drbd and install an os (debian 4 or ubuntu 8). The xens are running as pvm. Everything works fine since over 4 months now. But we have some performance-Problems: Writing

> OK, I forgot to update the ARM4 code. That should definitely be fixed > (otherwise it's not going to work). If this is not going to work then why does it work on my Arm? Any quick fix I can do for now? > > The second warning is in ltp_arm4.h in "pitch_xcorr(" getting a warning of: > > "matching constraint does not allow a register" on the "

I am using speex on a Philips LPC2138 Arm 7 processor and have hit two compiler warnings when using FIXED_POINT and the Arm 4 asm code. In cb_search.c get a warning on the call to compute_weighted_codebook of: "passing arg 2 of 'compute_weighted_codebook' from incompatible pointer type' In cp_search_arm4.h it is defined as: static void compute_weighted_codebook(const signed