search for: perfdb

...the nightly tests, and I'm not sure I should change them to "simple" or keep as "nightly" but do it via LNT. When I added Livermore, I presumed I was running LNT with the nightly variant (nt): ./sandbox/bin/python sandbox/bin/lnt runtest \ --submit ~/devel/llvm/test/perfdb \ nt \ -j8 \ --sandbox sandbox \ --test-suite ~/devel/llvm/test/test-suite \ --cc ~/devel/llvm/build/bin/clang \ --cxx ~/devel/llvm/build/bin/clang++ \ --only-test SingleSource/Benchmarks/LivermoreLoops Is that right? cheers, --renato -------------...

...resumed I was running LNT with the nightly > variant (nt): Strangely enough, I believe LNT's "nt" corresponds to the test-suite's "TEST=simple". I could be wrong, though. > > ./sandbox/bin/python sandbox/bin/lnt runtest \ > --submit ~/devel/llvm/test/perfdb \ > nt \ > -j8 \ > --sandbox sandbox \ > --test-suite ~/devel/llvm/test/test-suite \ > --cc ~/devel/llvm/build/bin/clang \ > --cxx ~/devel/llvm/build/bin/clang++ \ > --only-test SingleSource/Benchmarks/LivermoreLoops > > Is...

Another issue is that the "fast nightly test" builders aren't working properly: they report success even though they failed (this started happening about one month ago, I don't know what the reason is). While this should be investigated, I'm tempted to just move everything over to LNT instead... Ciao, Duncan.

To weigh in here... On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 8:15 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > +Daniel & Michael who work on the LNT infrastructure & might have some > thoughts on the differences & their merits & motivations. > > On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> > wrote: > > David, > > > >