Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "perfbmk".
2010 Nov 13
3
[LLVMdev] tot clang/llvm and tot gcc performance comparision
...2497 2422 -3.00%
256.bzip2 1585 1740 9.80%
300.twolf 2294 2281 -0.58%
As you can see, LLVM beats gcc in vpr, crafty and vortex by about 3%, but
falls behind gcc in gzip, gcc, mcf, eon, perfbmk, and bzip2 by a large
margin.
32bit:
llvm gcc
gcc vs llvm
164.gzip 1210 1239 2.44%
175.vpr 1662 1621 -2.42%
181.mcf...
2010 Nov 14
0
[LLVMdev] tot clang/llvm and tot gcc performance comparision
...2422 -3.00%
> 256.bzip2 1585 1740 9.80%
> 300.twolf 2294 2281 -0.58%
>
> As you can see, LLVM beats gcc in vpr, crafty and vortex by about 3%, but falls behind gcc in gzip, gcc, mcf, eon, perfbmk, and bzip2 by a large margin.
>
>
> 32bit:
> llvm gcc gcc vs llvm
> 164.gzip 1210 1239 2.44%
> 175.vpr 1662 1621 -2.4...