search for: percolating

What is the likelyhood that major inexpensive webhosts like godaddy, bluehost, etc. will upgrade to RoR 1.1? Is this going to be like PHP 5 where it has to percolate for a year or more before it becomes widly available? Your thoughts? Along the same lines... is it possible to adopt some of the new improved Ajax / javascript capabilities without actually upgrading the ruby installation?

I installed a debian squeeze desktop client today and a squeeze, with xen 4, on one of our servers. I had problems getting libvirt on the client to create virtual machines on the server. The fix was to create a symbolic link called xen to /usr/lib64/xen-4.0 on the server as libvirt was looking for files in that path. Is there anything else I should be aware of/issues regarding this setup? I

On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:25:14 -0700 (PDT) James Browning via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 10/25/2023 11:16 AM PDT Rowland Penny via samba > > <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:53:07 -0500 > > Ham via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > It appears that none of

Hello All. This is purely from a particular VLIW target back-end perspective. There it is possible to schedule an MI on to one of multiple execution pipes. This leads to a different instruction encoding per the pipe it is bound to, and need to percolate this information down. Would it be advisable to extend and use the "MachineInstr.Flags" field for this purpose? Right now this flag

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, June 30, 2016 2:59 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I've been googling, and haven't yet found the answer: does anyone here >> know if a MegaRAID SAS 2008 (falcon) (rev 03) can handle drives bigger >> than 2TB? > > One way to find out is to plug 4TB drive and take a look. Another is to > ask one who has the same controller

I am able to start kick off windows/linux installs on a new vm but then find the installation can''t read from the dvd-rom....xe cd-list reports the dvd-rom as scsi? I am using xcp 1 beta and xencenter fp1. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Chris _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com

Anyone using the penalised partial likelihood routines in survival5 should update their version. A bug has been fixed in the S package: in coxph() models with penalised likelihood and strata it was possible in some circumstances to get an infinite loop or perhaps an incorrect answer. The new version (2.3) is on cran.r-project.org and will percolate through CRAN in the next few days. -thomas

Version 3.18 of the survey package is now percolating through CRAN. Since the last announcement on this list, in February, the main additions are - standard errors for survival curves (both Kaplan-Meier and Cox model) - svyciprop() for confidence intervals on proportions, especially in small samples or near 0 or 1. - predictive margins by direc...

Version 3.18 of the survey package is now percolating through CRAN. Since the last announcement on this list, in February, the main additions are - standard errors for survival curves (both Kaplan-Meier and Cox model) - svyciprop() for confidence intervals on proportions, especially in small samples or near 0 or 1. - predictive margins by direc...

Anyone using the penalised partial likelihood routines in survival5 should update their version. A bug has been fixed in the S package: in coxph() models with penalised likelihood and strata it was possible in some circumstances to get an infinite loop or perhaps an incorrect answer. The new version (2.3) is on cran.r-project.org and will percolate through CRAN in the next few days. -thomas

...Fri Dec 28 14:26:16 2018 UTC failed, result > 8 (WERR_NOT_ENOUGH_MEMORY) > 206 consecutive failure(s). > Last success @ NTTIME(0) This all worked previously. I don't believe that memory is really the problem, rather this appears to be a generic error percolating up. my samba.log shows this: > [2018/12/28 15:30:44.911645, 0] > ../source4/smbd/server.c:510(binary_smbd_main) > samba version 4.9.4 started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2018 > [2018/12/28 15:30:47.282129, 0] > ../source4/smbd/server.c:696(binary_sm...

On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 ivo_welch-rstat8783@mailblocks.com wrote: > > peter/brian: thank you for the help. i can now report that gentoo > amd64 can compile R just fine, too; it requires the f77 USE flag and a > gcc compiler rebuild first, though. I also went to gcc 3.4.1. my > segfault troubles earlier were caused by my use of f2c. > > suggestion: would it be possible to

Dear Dirk, I have had the exactly same problem like Ivo and his solution worked for me. Hence the USE=f77 flag is NOT a typo but a Gentoo quirk. As far as modifying the configure script is concerned, I believe that it is certainly possible to perform said check (if 'f77 --version == f2c' then die) only on x86_64 platforms. And I'd argue it is f2c's fault. AMD64 linux distros have

A guess (treat accordingly): Different BLAS versions are in use on the two different machines/versions. In one, near singularities are handled, and in the other they are not, percolating up to warnings at the R level. You can check this by seeing whether the estimated fit is the same on the 2 machines. If so, ignore the above. -- Bert Bert Gunter "The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and sticking things into it." -- Opus (aka Berkele...

On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:11:14 +0200 Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 12:44:58 +0200 > Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2019 01:16:14 +0200 > > Halil Pasic <pasic at linux.ibm.com> wrote: > > > @@ -886,6 +888,8 @@ static const struct attribute_group *cssdev_attr_groups[] = { > >

My appologies, this estimation is about right, I spent last week at COMPSTAT in prague and didn't follow the list closely. Inspite of this fact I believe my posting is not entirely out of date. regards Diman Todorov ------------------------------ You are 8 days behind the times -- take a look at the current R-devel. On Sun, 29 Aug 2004, Diman Todorov wrote: > Dear Dirk, > I

I am helping a student with some logistic regression analyses and we are getting some strange inconsistencies regarding a warning about factor levels being dropped when running predict.glm(, newdata = ournewdata) on the logistic regression model object. We have checked multiple times that the factor levels have been defined similarly on both data sets (one used to estimate model and the newdata)

On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 10:33 PM Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> wrote: > On 11/21/18 4:39 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 09:25:05AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> nbdkit: file.2: error: invalid request: offset and count are out of > range: offset=196608 count=512 > > > > Actually what happens even more precisely is that the

...ure(s). > > > > > Last success @ NTTIME(0) > > > > > > > > > > > > This all worked previously. I don't believe that memory is > > > > really the problem, rather this appears to be a generic error > > > > percolating up. my samba.log shows this: > > > > > > > > > [2018/12/28 15:30:44.911645, 0] > > > > > ../source4/smbd/server.c:510(binary_smbd_main) > > > > > samba version 4.9.4 started. > > > > > Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Sam...

On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 15:43 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 08:27:04AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-05-23 at 21:50 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > > > I re-read that discussion and I'm still unclear on the > > > original question, since I got several apparently > > > conflicting answers. >