search for: perceive

Hi all, I used to use centos 4.5 on an AMD 4800+ with 2GIG ram. Now I use centos 5.1 on AMD 6400+ with 4GIG RAM. The system responsiveness is different between the two. I noticed that centos 5.1 seems to be swapping programs out of memory at times resulting in slowness (perceived by me). I played with swappiness (/proc/sys/vm/) setting to 10, then 1 then 0. Still resulted in the same perceived slowness. Today I did swapoff -a and now the system obviously does not swap anything out all all. I thought thats what swappiness of 0 would have done. Are others experiencing this...

...roperly and checked this with additional ssh rules. ServerA is a Raspberry box with the vendor's Asterisk version 1.8.13.1 and ServerB is normal CentOS 7 box with Asterisk 13.1. Calling from ServerB to ServerA works, but not vice versa. The only odd thing that appears to me is the different perceived port on ServerA. ServerA*CLI> iax2 show registry Host dnsmgr Username Perceived Refresh State 80.152.xxx.xxx:4569 N ServerA 79.233.yyy.yyy:45697 60 Registered ServerB*CLI> iax2 show registry Host dnsmgr Username Perceived...

So I had my feet entirely covered in peanut butter and jelly .. wait ... Wrong mailing list. Couple weeks ago I mailed the list with a perceived problem of Mongrels hanging. Luis and others were very kind in suggesting solutions. I suspected my application anyway and went on a quest. I was using RMagick at the time so felt that should be my first target. Long story short: after days of uninstalling RMagick (which did NOT fix thing...

...eemed successful. I used the following code: > "Attitude" = c(1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) > "Normative Beliefs" = c(1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) > "Subjective Norm" = c(0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) > "Control Beliefs" = c(1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) > "Perceived Behavioural Control" = c(0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0) > "Intention" = c(0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0) > "Behaviour" = c(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0) > TPB_path = rbind(`Behavioural Beliefs`, Attitude, `Normative Beliefs`, `Subjective Norm`, `Control Beliefs`, `Perceived Behavi...

Both vector query's can select the values from the data.frame as written, however in the first form assigning a value to said selected numbers fails. Can you explain the reason this fails? dat <- data.frame(index = 1:10, Value = c(1:4, NA, 6, NA, 8:10)) dat$Value[dat$Value == "NA"] <- 1 #Why does this fails to work, dat$Value[dat$Value %in% NA] <- 1 #While this does

In a system connected to a verizon T1, Digium TE411P (quad T1 echo cancellation), client is complaining it is "too quiet". The complaint regards calls over the T1, not in house SIP only calls. Their description indicates they want some earpiece feedback of themselves speaking. Also, they complain that it takes several seconds (3-4) for the other party to respond. That is kind of

...high volume). I was going to reply that I do post the release announcements on the blog, but now I see I forgot to do that for 3.8 :-/ Last time, I talked about posting to llvm-announce about release candidates, etc., but never actually followed through as I was ambivalent about how people would perceive the signal-to-noise ratio. It's similar for the blog: is info about release candidates valuable for those not involved enough to read llvm-dev, or would it be perceived as noise, hiding more important contents? I'm pretty undecided...

...bout the general philosophy of unit testing, which is that the presence of such tests alters the calculation of risk when making changes to a code base. Programmers have various rules of thumb for estimating risk - for example, a change which affects a large number of lines of code is generally perceived to be riskier than a change which affects a small number of lines. But at the same time, some very large changes can carry almost no risk - such as changing the name of a symbol which occurs in thousands of places in the code - because the compiler will tell you if you made a mistake anywhere...

...onfigure the FXO port on a Sipura-3000 for use with Asterisk. When I connect to the Sipura to dial out on the PSTN line connected to the Sipura's FXO port, it gives me the dialtone of the PSTN line and then I can hear the DTMF for the number I dialled beforehand. It does work but the customer perceives this delayed second DTMF feedback as "unprofessional" and the sipura as a "toy". I wonder if there is anything that can be done to keep the channel to the caller silent until after the Sipura has sent the DTMF out on the PSTN line. Any hints appreciated. thanks rgds benjk --...

This mail depends upon the fact that I don't have a couple of good earphones ;-) I read in the site that q=6 is a very high quality, but does it contain perceivable differencies from the original? (for 95% of people, of course). I also found q=6 to produce files slightly bigger (1/10 bigger) than those produced with lame VBR q=2 (about 192 bps on average). I always thought LAME VBR q=2

..., 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) >>> >>> "Normative Beliefs" = c(1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) >>> >>> "Subjective Norm" = c(0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) >>> >>> "Control Beliefs" = c(1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0) >>> >>> "Perceived Behavioural Control" = c(0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0) >>> >>> "Intention" = c(0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0) >>> >>> "Behaviour" = c(0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0) >>> >>> TPB_path = rbind(`Behavioural Beliefs`, Attitude, `Normative Belie...

...ever it looks like my * still wants to try and register using IAX1, and I can't find how to turn this off. This situation is confirmed in the response from "iax show registry" and "iax2 show registry": enterprise*CLI> iax show registry Host Username Perceived Refresh State 69.73.19.178:5036 ##myid## <Unregistered> 60 Request Sent enterprise*CLI> iax2 show registry Host Username Perceived Refresh State 69.73.19.178:4569 ##myid## ##myIP##:4569 60 Registered Can I shut off these attempts to...

...ply use some variation of MSE (mean squared error, which is what PSNR is derived from), or more typically SAD (Sum of Absolute Differences), which is a very similar metric (but easier to calculate). In either case, as has been discussed, the results of this approach do not correlate very well with perceived quality, especially when taken over varying types of source material (as your examples prove). So, for my money, the codecs should be doing a better job of incorporating some intelligence to correlate their 'Q' values to actual perceived quality, rather than some arbitrary pixel differenc...

...conscious that my personal experience is far to be a objetive comparison. I switched from UW-Imap/Mbox to Dovecot/Maildir a box with 45k local users, 3.5MB/s sustained IMAP/POP traffic in work hours. The main performance gain is from mbox -> maildir switching. Anyway the users (and myself) "perceive" a good performance with the new setup. Regards, maykel [1] http://www.isode.com/whitepapers/mbox-benchmark.html

Hello, All of the Opus quality studies that I've seen focused on human-perceived quality. I'm interested to know of any experience with machined "perceived" quality, particularly related to speech recognition or biometrics. I'm also interested in folks thoughts on optimizing Opus for ASR. For example, removing certain classes of comfort noise, filtering no...

...otally reflect call quality I am using ping as a cheap subsitute to having a real VoIP testing system The question I have is this one: given that one service gives me a 80ms ping (pretty consistantly) and another one gives me 30ms (again very consistently), is this 50ms difference enough to impact perceived call quality? Or will the quality be impossible to differenciate, and I should choose based on some other criteria? (customer service, price, etc) The thing is I can`t really see a difference myself, but I am told that my hearing isn`t that great so I should judge based on that. While I`m here...

..., disregarding the part some of us dislike personally > (plus often reboots necessary to install some vital updates > - which all Linuxes are prone to beginning somewhere around > 2.6 kernel) . . . I am glad to discover that I am not losing my mind. I too have been rather dismayed at the perceived increase in frequency with which I must reboot my servers. I wondered whether this was simply a misconception on my part or an actual change in the environment. Apparently it is the later. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-...

I blogged about some of the problems with aaf in production (http://www.jroller.com/BrightCandle) yesterday but inspired by the poitive response I thought I would share the perceived problems and discuss some of the potential solutions to help newcomers and make aaf work as if by magic just like Rails does. All of these problems boil down to one simple problem, running acts as ferret in a production environment simply is not consistent with the rails behaviour. Rails is singl...

...some extent to Statistics. Can somebody help me how should I interpret these figures. I feel difficulty in interpreting values and respective rows and columns. The following is the result to which I request interpretation: > anova.stress$effects (Intercept) heavy.drinking perceived.health life.satisfaction -127.7707327310 66.6366413568 58.0918782595 -6.9519755523 -0.7947641734 6.6881854290 13.3244486754 12.0570313711 14.1251305762 6.9407880977 7.7357329414 12.0627416985 -11.0900101005 1.2013513103 0.5663285592 For example i...

> On Jun 19, 2020, at 15:38, Mehdi AMINI via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm interested to hear more about the actual problem Matt perceives with respect to the release actually: why should the release have any impact with the development branch? > That was just an example of a concrete time. Other transitions requiring wide coordination have had some release-associated timeframe (like minimum toolchain/cmake upgrades), so I thoug...