Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "perack".
Did you mean:
serack
2006 Aug 28
0
[Bug 507] New: tun99 don't trapped by tun+
...VPN but all is using only one interface: tun99.
For some strange reasons if you look at my "iptables -L FORWARD -v", the rule
who match in:tun+/out:any doesn't match packets from tun99. The packets count
reveal the problem. So I've manuelly added tun99 to trap the packets:
[root@perack ~]# iptables -L FORWARD -v
Chain FORWARD (policy DROP 4 packets, 366 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
677K 448M eth0_fwd all -- eth0 any anywhere anywhere
417K 452M tun_fwd all -- tun+ any anywhere...