search for: pepperflash

All, As has already been brought up, we have not yet been able to build the new version of Chromium-32 for CentOS, and the current version (31.0.1650.63-1.el6) needs updating. We have also recently been informed that we may not redistribute the PepperFlash Library from the Google site (libpepflashplayer.so) as we did in 31.0.1650.63-1.el6. Therefore, I have had to rebuild the currently released version to remove the libpepflashplayer.so library. What this means for all Chromium users is that after upgrade, you will no longer have built in flash. I...

Hi, I recently upgraded chromium on a 32-bit CentOS 6.4 system yesterday to version to chromium-28.0.1500.95-213514.i686. I then ran the chrome_pepperflash_copy.sh script, but my copy of the script was before it was modified to check the architecture so it downloaded the 64 bit chrome rpm and installed that version of pepper. I tried to run chromium but was greeted with "Illegal Instruction (core dumped)". I then noticed the 64-bit rpm was...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 18/04/16 14:15, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > Thanks. I imagine (hope?) there shouldn't be too much effort to get > this to work, since it's already been done upstream. RedHat > continues to push out updates even. E.g. > https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0638.html > that looks like Supplementary content - we've never

...makes it Supplementary content and not >> completely open source. Do we atleast know at this point what that >> might be ? >> >> regards >> >> - -- >> Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project > > > I suspect it has to do with their "pepperflash" flash plugin. > > Clearly flash is on the way out, so any support for it is not necessary. > It is indeed not completely open source. I was told that the agreement between Red Hat and Google only allows the RPMs for RHEL to be released to subscribers on the supplemental channel....

...nd Red Hat > where this works done, that makes it Supplementary content and not > completely open source. Do we atleast know at this point what that > might be ? > > regards > > - -- > Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project I suspect it has to do with their "pepperflash" flash plugin. Clearly flash is on the way out, so any support for it is not necessary. -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu

...;> completely open source. Do we atleast know at this point what that > >> might be ? > >> > >> regards > >> > >> - -- > >> Karanbir Singh, Project Lead, The CentOS Project > > > > > > I suspect it has to do with their "pepperflash" flash plugin. > > > > Clearly flash is on the way out, so any support for it is not necessary. > > > > It is indeed not completely open source. I was told that the agreement > between Red Hat and Google only allows the RPMs for RHEL to be released > to subscribe...