Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "peoplesquest".
2005 Aug 21
1
Samba Stopped Connecting on Me and I don't know why
Hello All,
I am having a problem trying to ger Samba wot work again. It was
working a few days ago and now it has stopped. My OpenVPN is working
just fine but Samba does not seem to find the names.
I was also trying to set it up so that the users could browse to our
PeoplesQuest workgroup after which they could login to their account.
-----------------------------------------
[2005/08/21 07:03:26, 0] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(718)
Netbios nameserver version 3.0.20rc2 started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1994-2004
[2005/08/21 07:03:26, 0] nmbd/asyncdns.c:start_...
2005 Sep 11
0
Discard datagram messages
...lementation of Samba
better.\
I am still having a great problem with getting messages from the nmbd
daemon saying that
------------------------
[2005/09/10 14:53:43, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_browse_packet(1050)
process_browse_packet: Discarding datagram from IP 172.16.0.1. Source
name PEOPLESQUEST<00>
is one of our names !
[2005/09/10 14:56:52, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_browse_packet(1050)
process_browse_packet: Discarding datagram from IP 172.16.0.1. Source
name PEOPLESQUEST<00>
is one of our names !
[2005/09/10 15:00:07, 0] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_browse_packet(1050...
2005 Aug 19
0
WINS Bind Config
Greetings All,
Can some one please tell me what causes this:
---------------------------------------
[2005/08/19 01:45:07, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name_response(130)
register_name_response: WINS server at IP 172.16.0.1 rejected our name
registration of
PEOPLESQUEST<00> IP 172.16.0.1 with error code 5.
[2005/08/19 01:45:07, 0] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:fail_register(228)
fail_register: Failed to register name PEOPLESQUEST<00> on subnet
UNICAST_SUBNET.
[2005/08/19 01:45:07, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:standard_fail_register(283)
standard_fail_regis...
2006 Feb 10
1
Tinc and multi-netname setting on single machines with 1 ethernet card
...o both netname1 and netname2 networks
thus allowing B and C to see traffic coming from A, right?
Please clarify this for me if some one could.
--
Sincerely and have a good day,
Lonnie T. Cumberland
Email: Lonnie@outstep.com
Lonnie_Cumberland@yahoo.com
Recommended sites:
http://www.peoplesquest.com