search for: peopele

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello everyone, I know that many people know not to use .local, but in the last weeks we had several People having problems using .local. So to all peopel starting implementing Samba 4 AD, read this: http://miketelahun.wordpress.com/2012/09/16/stop-using-local-as-the-top-level-domain-for-your-lan/ So stop using .local as TLD. Maybe there should be a

Hi, I had an idea which I would like to post. Not sure if this is the right place but I don't see anywhere else. Where you can run wine as a window. "Emulate Virtual Desktop", would it be possible to set a workspace up as a virtual desktop? I am interested to know what other people think, am I the only one who would like this or do other peopel thin its a good idea too? Also I a

On 05/01/15 07:00, Achim Gottinger wrote: > Hello, > > I deployed an Samba 4 AD back in 2013 with .local, not knowing it can > cause troubles with mDns. > On my linux server i did not install avahi and i do not have mDns in > my nsswitch.conf hosts entry. > On windows machines i usually deinstall bonjour whenever it shows up > and i do not install it when installing

Hi peopel, i am install the samba server version 3.5, and my Windows server when i try connect show that error: "The device attached to the system not functioning". My client windows xp, vista, 7 connect with out errors. Someone help? -- Att, Maiquel

During the Christmas holiday I created a AD DC & a MEMBER server (both on Debian 7.7.0) with these scripts (https://secure.bazuin.nl/scripts/) and thank you, L.P.H. van Belle. However, I have created them with a *.local TLD (that now I need to change.) I will need to adjust my hostname files, need to re-configure the kerberos install and of course Bind9. The hostname files I know how to

I expected to re-provision the domain. (That is easy, now.) Okay, so now the question becomes after the re-provision of the domain on the DC what needs to be changed on the MEMBER server. Obviously, the hostname needs to be corrected and check any needed changes within the smb.conf file. Thoughts? --- ------------------------- Bob Wooden of Donelson Trophy 615.885.2846 (main)

I'm not sure if I would not advise to use .local, sometimes it seems to be needed to make a proper location for a running domain where even .cityname cannot accomplish what you need. To be honest I don't run Avahi and will not either. Avahi and mdns are actually only designed because of of bad DNS management by system administrators and have (Apple) users use all their features, the same

Micrososft changed this statement a several of times. The only reason they did is because people using Apple are complaining some services are not working "well" on their OSX and it's a pain to change the DNS name of your Business Server on Windows Server As said before, running on .alocal for Avahi works perfectly and mDNS is only for small networks, and setting up some proper DNS

On 23/04/16 02:13, Gabriele Pohl wrote: > I administer a postfix mail server on CentOS 6. > Now I want to setup another with similar configuration. > > But the postgrey package is no longer available in Epel > for this CentOS release as I have seen now: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/postgrey/ > > 1. Will I have to make an upgrade of the existing

On 04/01/15 16:11, Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > During the Christmas holiday I created a AD DC & a MEMBER server (both > on Debian 7.7.0) with these scripts (https://secure.bazuin.nl/scripts/) > and thank you, L.P.H. van Belle. > > However, I have created them with a *.local TLD (that now I need to > change.) > > I will need to adjust my hostname files, need to

Hello, I deployed an Samba 4 AD back in 2013 with .local, not knowing it can cause troubles with mDns. On my linux server i did not install avahi and i do not have mDns in my nsswitch.conf hosts entry. On windows machines i usually deinstall bonjour whenever it shows up and i do not install it when installing itunes. Till now i have not had any dns resolve issues, still i'd like to change

Thomas LeZotte wrote: > Does anyone know if you can share a directory on a unix system, witch > will allow users in the "write list" to write after logging in. But if > a user is not in the "write list" then they are automatically logged in > as guest, with read only permissions. The write list will do what you want, but the user must be logged in first, as

Sending to you without the mailinglist is on the same level as proper administration of a network ? This is new to me and I'm sure to others too. What might be new to you is that Avahi runs on the domain it finds and not what it expects. That is how the protocol works, it searches, sees the domain of the protocol and goes on. So all Avahi users in a network will run on .alocal is you set the

Hai Achim, If everything is working correct, wel dont change the domainname then. if resolving is setup correct you should not notice the problems. even with apple devices, and looks like you did that already and correct. Its never adviced to change the domainname of a domain, and if you do, make sure you know what to change. - DNS ( any dns/db tools, can be done with the windows tools. (

On 04/01/15 16:45, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > > > I expected to re-provision the domain. (That is easy, now.) > > Okay, so now the question becomes after the re-provision of the domain > on the DC what needs to be changed on the MEMBER server. Obviously, the > hostname needs to be corrected and check any needed changes within the > smb.conf file. > > Thoughts?

I'm not missing the point, the point is that you actually cannot tell why .local should stay local always and forever. That's my point, you don't know either as you ask yourself already, "why should I config Avahi myself ?". Indeed stay in control of your network or stay out. 2015-01-05 13:02 GMT+01:00 Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>: > On 05/01/15

Hi, I administer a postfix mail server on CentOS 6. Now I want to setup another with similar configuration. But the postgrey package is no longer available in Epel for this CentOS release as I have seen now: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/postgrey/ 1. Will I have to make an upgrade of the existing mail server to get security patches again or is it not critical to use

On 05/01/15 11:18, Matt . wrote: > I'm not sure if I would not advise to use .local, sometimes it seems > to be needed to make a proper location for a running domain where even > .cityname cannot accomplish what you need. Hi, even microsoft don't recommend using .local, see http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc726016%28v=ws.10%29.aspx/ For the vast majority of people,

...ment institutions and to some extend for private companies is in their eyes the lack of a standard. Now you may say that we have the source and some documentation so why do we need Vorbis to be a standard. Well, to answer this you have to understand that these people are not like you and me. These peopele are unable to accept anything that doesn't have the word STANDARD rubberstamped all over. I have even some across Cisco folks saying they can't be allowed to use Vorbis because it is not a standard (and becuase it is proprietary). In my view, we need to get Vorbis standardized somehow to g...

On 05/01/15 11:34, Matt . wrote: > Micrososft changed this statement a several of times. > > The only reason they did is because people using Apple are complaining > some services are not working "well" on their OSX and it's a pain to > change the DNS name of your Business Server on Windows Server > > As said before, running on .alocal for Avahi works perfectly