search for: penwidth

Hello, I would like to have different linewidths for the edges of my graph. I read the documentation but could not find how to control this. On the Graphviz help page I've seen that there is something called "penwidth" but I could not find it in the R edge attributes. Thanks a lot for any help. Adrian Dragulescu

...t/topology-figure-3.dot @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +digraph T { + /* Make sure our payloads are always drawn below the driver node */ + subgraph cluster_driver { + fillcolor = grey; + style = filled; + edge [dir=none]; + driver -> payload1; + driver -> payload2 [penwidth=3]; + edge [dir=""]; + } + + /* Driver malloc references */ + edge [style=dashed]; + driver -> port1; + driver -> port2; + driver -> port3:e; + driver -> port4 [color=grey]; + payload1:s -> port1:e; + payload2:s -> port3:e [penwidth=3];...

...t/topology-figure-3.dot @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +digraph T { + /* Make sure our payloads are always drawn below the driver node */ + subgraph cluster_driver { + fillcolor = grey; + style = filled; + edge [dir=none]; + driver -> payload1; + driver -> payload2 [penwidth=3]; + edge [dir=""]; + } + + /* Driver malloc references */ + edge [style=dashed]; + driver -> port1; + driver -> port2; + driver -> port3:e; + driver -> port4 [color=grey]; + payload1:s -> port1:e; + payload2:s -> port3:e [penwidth=3];...

...erences */ + node [shape=oval]; + + mstb1 -> {port1, port2}; + port1 -> mstb2; + edge [color=grey]; + port2 -> mstb3 -> {port3, port4}; + port3 -> mstb4; + edge [color=""]; + + /* Malloc references */ + edge [style=dashed]; + port3 -> mstb3 [penwidth=3]; + mstb3 -> port2 [penwidth=3]; + mstb2 -> port1; + {port1, port2} -> mstb1; + edge [color=grey]; + mstb4 -> port3; + port4 -> mstb3; + edge [color=""]; + + edge [dir=back]; + node [style=filled;shape=box;fillcolor=lightblue]; + port1 ->...

...b1 -> {port1, port2}; > + port1 -> mstb2; > + edge [color=grey]; > + port2 -> mstb3 -> {port3, port4}; > + port3 -> mstb4; > + edge [color=""]; > + > + /* Malloc references */ > + edge [style=dashed]; > + port3 -> mstb3 [penwidth=3]; > + mstb3 -> port2 [penwidth=3]; > + mstb2 -> port1; > + {port1, port2} -> mstb1; > + edge [color=grey]; > + mstb4 -> port3; > + port4 -> mstb3; > + edge [color=""]; > + > + edge [dir=back]; > + node [style=filled...

...color=grey]; > > > + port2 -> mstb3 -> {port3, port4}; > > > + port3 -> mstb4; > > > + edge [color=""]; > > > + > > > + /* Malloc references */ > > > + edge [style=dashed]; > > > + port3 -> mstb3 [penwidth=3]; > > > + mstb3 -> port2 [penwidth=3]; > > > + mstb2 -> port1; > > > + {port1, port2} -> mstb1; > > > + edge [color=grey]; > > > + mstb4 -> port3; > > > + port4 -> mstb3; > > > + edge [color="&...

...-> mstb2; > > + edge [color=grey]; > > + port2 -> mstb3 -> {port3, port4}; > > + port3 -> mstb4; > > + edge [color=""]; > > + > > + /* Malloc references */ > > + edge [style=dashed]; > > + port3 -> mstb3 [penwidth=3]; > > + mstb3 -> port2 [penwidth=3]; > > + mstb2 -> port1; > > + {port1, port2} -> mstb1; > > + edge [color=grey]; > > + mstb4 -> port3; > > + port4 -> mstb3; > > + edge [color=""]; > > + > > +...

...d at eskimo.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I would like to have different linewidths for the edges of my graph. I >> read the documentation but could not find how to control this. On the >> Graphviz help page I've seen that there is something called "penwidth" but I >> could not find it in the R edge attributes. >> >> Thanks a lot for any help. >> >> Adrian Dragulescu >> >> ______________________________________________ >> R-help at r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/list...

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

This is a WIP version of the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a

This is the series I've been working on for a while now to get all of the atomic DRM drivers in the tree to use the atomic MST helpers, and to make the atomic MST helpers actually idempotent. Turns out it's a lot more difficult to do that without also fixing how port and branch device refcounting works so that it actually makes sense, since the current upstream implementation requires a