search for: penisoara

> What would you recommand ? Are there any other elegant solutions ? > How about using 802.1Q vlan's and dedicate a vlan to each port. If more than 4000 users then add more gateways. Just be sure to go for switches that allow you to deny incoming already tagged packets on the user side as some switches passes already tagged packets. For a wireless environment i would suggest PPPoE

Hi, On 8/10/06, Mark Bucciarelli <mark@gaiahost.coop> wrote: > > > There's a scary security alert from yesterday out and no port > update so I judged it to be isp-related. I looked for > ports-security list but didn't see one. > > You know, that might be a very good ideea -- e.g. have a security team and list for ports as we have one for the base distribution.

Dear Security team, I'm Kamolpat Pornatiwiwat, Sys admin of DMaccess Co., Ltd. I'm got the problem, My FreeBSD 6.0 got Dos attacked. What should I do? At the present, I decide to stop apache and leave only mail feature on functioning. Any guide/recommend/solution will be appreciated. More detail about my server: ====================== FreeBSD 6.0 apache-1.3.34_4 php5-5.1.2_1 MySQL

Hi Adrian, Sunday, April 4, 2004, 10:22:33 PM, you wrote: AP> We have thought about using static MAC entries per port on managed AP> switches installed at the client endpoints, but that would require a AP> overwhelming budget. We are also thinking about L2TP and PPPoE, but I AP> am uncertain about compatibility. AP> What would you recommand ? Are there any other elegant

Hi everyone, I administer this 5.2.1 Freebsd Box which runs a few services, among of which are bind and postfix. On the same box I run ipfw as a firewall, and have a default policy block for all incoming packets, except for those that are for ports 53 (tcp and udp) and 25 (tcp). I also have the following sysctl values enabled: net.inet.tcp.blackhole=2 net.inet.udp.blackhole=1 In my security logs I