search for: penetrations

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 200 matches for "penetrations".

Did you mean: penetration
2013 Mar 21
7
Is it fine to upgrade to Centos 6 rpms, being at centos 5.8
Hi, I'm currently at CentOS 5.8. After some penetration testing, found some high severity OpenSSH issues which would require its upgrade. But till CentOS 5.9 the latest rpm available is openssh-4.3p2-82.el5 (which I'm currently using). Is it fine to upgrade to CentOS 6 rpms while I'm on CentOS 5? Thanks, Anumeha
2004 Apr 19
11
Size of R user base
I have been trying to determine the size of the R user base, and was asked to share my findings with this mailing list. Although I still don't have any definite estimate of this number, I do have some interesting and indicative information: 1. It appears that there are about 100,000 S-PLUS users. Rationale: According to Insightful's 2002 Annual Report, over 100,000 people use
2009 Oct 17
5
Calling all Hackers
Hey guys. I have a server that is owned by me and can confirm through servint that it is owned by me. I would like to do a penetration test and of course to allow you to upload files on the server and kind of trash it to the point where it is always restarting and running out of memory etc etc. This is going to be mainly script kiddie stuff, however will be able to get you hired on with me for
2008 Oct 10
0
[LLVMdev] 2.4 Pre-release (v1) Available for Testing
> I could add that to my CMake build system TODO, but so far I'm a bit > skeptic about LLVM relevance on the non-Unix world. The Windows build > can be broken for a long period before anyone notices. The VS2003 > support is broken since a long time ago and, apart from myself, no > other > user cares. Seems that LLVM penetration on Windows, for instance, is > almost nil. Is
2015 Jun 10
2
Am I cracked?
On Wednesday 10 Jun 2015, Luca Bertoncello wrote: > I'm very sorry to write that, but these answers are really NOT helpful... > I searched two days long how can I check it and didn't found anything > useful... > > Could someone suggest me a way to check if my Asterisk is an "Open > Relay" that accept connections from every peer? Someone on this list is bound
2016 Jan 22
2
How to get UEFI setting by shell?
On 1/22/2016 1:23 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 01/22/2016 11:11 AM, John R Pierce wrote: >> if you can insert a custom Machine Owner Key into this keyring, then >> anyone with sufficient ingenuity can, too. which renders the whole >> signature thing moot, other than as another step to be cracked. > > I'm not sure you understand mokutil. You do know that in
2006 Jun 30
2
Rails Powers #1 Selling Album Site
Just a heads up that the new record label site for Vagrant Records runs on Rails and PostgreSQL. Right now it is FCGI based but we''re moving to Apache+Mongrel next week. It is looking like they are going to have the #1 selling album in the country this week with Dashboard Confessional''s new record. Just a note to let people know that Rails has penetrated Billboard!
2008 Oct 10
8
[LLVMdev] 2.4 Pre-release (v1) Available for Testing
OvermindDL1 <overminddl1 at gmail.com> writes: [snip] > On this first compile everything compiled except for llc and lli, > which did not link due to: > unresolved external symbol "class llvm::FunctionPass * __cdecl > llvm::createPBQPRegisterAllocator(void)" That is because the lib/CodeGen project file is missing PBQP.cpp. [snip] > On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 2:11
2006 Jun 12
6
Changing from dynamic ip to static ip
Hello, I have been on a dynamic ip for about 5 years and have just upgraded to a static ip. I know I need to change my network setup on my eth0 nic to static and stop ddclient from trying to update my address but is there _really_ anything else I need to change. I have a couple of websites on this address using *:80 in my httpd.conf. I can easily change this but don't think it would really
2015 Feb 03
6
Another Fedora decision
OK, folks. You're doing a great job of describing the current milieu with a rough description of some best practices. Now how about some specific sources you personally used to learn your craft that we can use likewise? PatrickD
2015 Feb 03
0
Another Fedora decision
On 3 February 2015 at 13:34, PatrickD Garvey <patrickdgarveyt at gmail.com> wrote: > Now how about some specific sources you personally used to learn your > craft that we can use likewise? So many places it makes my brain hurt just thinking about it. Google and Wikipedia will keep you busy for a long while. Off the top of my head: There are some online "Security
2015 Feb 04
1
Another Fedora decision
On Tue, 2015-02-03 at 15:02 +1100, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: > Thinking about you systems from a penetration testing perspective can > be helpful. For example, "Always Learning" has just told us that he > uses single character root passwords on his testing machines, that he > is testing 7 days a week and does not turn off his test machines. Yes single character. Writing and
2010 Jan 02
1
Boxplot- change the vertical line from dash to solid
Dear, I am a newbie to R. Now I am learning to draw boxplot using graphics(). I want to change the vertical line penetrating the box from dashed line to solid line Please kindly share the command and thank you. Elaine [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2005 Sep 19
0
RUXCON 2005 Update
Hi, RUXCON is quickly approaching yet again. This e-mail is to bring you up to date on the latest developments on this years conference. Our speakers list is complete [1] and our timetable has been finalised [2]. Below is a list of presentations for RUXCON 2005 (in order of acceptance): 1. Breaking Mac OSX - Ilja Van Sprundel & Neil Archibald 2. Binary protection schemes - Andrew
2004 Sep 04
2
Demo of using Theora under Windows
I have read http://www.theora.org/theorafaq.html#42 This put quite a burden onto the Windows-user - a burden that most Windows-users will not be able to lift. Has anyone made a webpage with a link to a theora-file that automatically (or with a few clicks on Accept/OK) installs the needed codecs on a unmodified Windows machine? (The links to theora-files on www.theora.org does not do this, which
2004 Jul 22
2
Nortel SL1 protocol and *?
I have been investigating more tight integration between * and the Nortel MICS... it appears that it is at least theoretically possible to have * store voicemail and log which stations call where. Both require a T1 card. The T1 card requires either a clocking module or the 6-port fiber module to provide T1 timing. Naturally a T100P or TE405P is required on the * side. To log which
2004 Aug 10
2
WiFi phone radiation regulation?
All, I just had the fortune to take one of the new Senao Wifi SIP phones for a short test drive. First look - it's a nice, compact phone. Weighs around 87g and roughly the size of a Nokia 6210. More on the those later. The thing that struck me was the RF power, it's rated at 100mw (20dBm). That's 10 times more than any of the other brands out on the market Cisco, WiSIP, Zyxel
2008 Jan 27
3
WPA question
HI I admit up front that I know just enough about wireless networking to know that I don't know much at all about it. That said, I'm hoping someone can help me learn a little bit... Specifically, could a laptop running Centos 5.1 be expected to (be able to) connect to a wireless access point using WPA2 security settings? I don't know if WPA depends on hardware support, or if
2018 Dec 17
2
A question about why the function "recv" return 0
I am a website developer. We deploy a Nginx server on centos to provide HTTP services. Recently, some customers of our website were complaining about that occasionally they could not open the webpage, the web browser show that the tcp connection was reset. I checked the Nginx logs and source code and found that the function "recv" return 0 when some customers made HTTP requests. Our
2016 Jun 17
1
https and self signed
On Thu, June 16, 2016 14:23, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Thu, June 16, 2016 1:09 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> >> I doubt that most users check the dates on SSL certificates, >> unless they are familiar enough with TLS to understand that >> a shorter validity period is better for security. > > Oh, this is what he meant: Cert validity period. Though I agree >