search for: pendings

There are several bugs at error path of create_snapshot() when the transaction commitment failed. - access the freed transaction handler. At the end of the transaction commitment, the transaction handler was freed, so we should not access it after the transaction commitment. - we were not aware of the error which happened during the snapshot creation if we submitted a async transaction

I''ve been using RSpec in anger for perhaps a total of a few days and just started playing with Story Runner. Love it. I also started working on a patch, which ought to be simple, to allow for Scenarios without supplied blocks to be treated as pending -- much like "it" in Spec::DSL::ExampleAPI. That said, I noticed something that seemed odd and chatted with Rein

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW > # > tags 402249 pending Bug#402249: please include the necessary headers for libvert Tags were: patch sid Tags added: pending > tags 426108 pending Bug#426108: lvm2: Please add LSB formatted dependency info in init.d script Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tags 460053

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # Saturday 2 February 19:03:31 UTC 2013 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: cliff-tablib > tags 699594 + pending Bug #699594 [wnpp] ITP: cliff-tablib -- tablib formatters for cliff Added tag(s) pending. > # Source package

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.18.1 # # logcheck (1.2.64) unstable; urgency=low # # * ignore.d.server/bind: # - moved "[bind] query $FOO denied" rule to violations.ignore.d # (closes: #443881). # - added bind's "AXFR ended" rule alongside "AXFR started" # (closes: #445046). # - added "adding an

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 05:22:28PM -0400, Long, Wai Man wrote: > >>@@ -233,11 +233,25 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val) > >> */ > >> for (;;) { > >> /* > >>- * If we observe any contention; queue. > >>+ * If we observe that the queue is not empty or both > >>+ * the pending and lock bits

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 05:22:28PM -0400, Long, Wai Man wrote: > >>@@ -233,11 +233,25 @@ void queue_spin_lock_slowpath(struct qspinlock *lock, u32 val) > >> */ > >> for (;;) { > >> /* > >>- * If we observe any contention; queue. > >>+ * If we observe that the queue is not empty or both > >>+ * the pending and lock bits

2014-05-07 11:01-0400, Waiman Long: > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> > > Because the qspinlock needs to touch a second cacheline; add a pending > bit and allow a single in-word spinner before we punt to the second > cacheline. I think there is an unwanted scenario on virtual machines: 1) VCPU sets the pending bit and start spinning. 2) Pending VCPU gets

2014-05-07 11:01-0400, Waiman Long: > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz at infradead.org> > > Because the qspinlock needs to touch a second cacheline; add a pending > bit and allow a single in-word spinner before we punt to the second > cacheline. I think there is an unwanted scenario on virtual machines: 1) VCPU sets the pending bit and start spinning. 2) Pending VCPU gets

If there''s is a long name directory exists in the /dev, then an overflow will hit in function utils.c btrfs_scan_one_dir:1013! The minimal fix is to use snprintf instead of strcpy. The reason why not using strncpy is that, if there is no null byte among the first n bytes of src, the string placed in dest will not be null - terminated. Signed-off-by: Rock Lee

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # Thursday 5 September 20:03:17 UTC 2013 > # Tagging as pending bugs that are closed by packages in NEW > # http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > # > # Source package in NEW: ndpi > tags 721551 + pending Bug #721551 [wnpp] ITP: ndpi -- extensible deep packet inspection library Added tag(s) pending. > # Source package in

2014-05-21 18:49+0200, Radim Kr?m??: > 2014-05-19 16:17-0400, Waiman Long: > > As for now, I will focus on just having one pending bit. > > I'll throw some ideas at it, One of the ideas follows; it seems sound, but I haven't benchmarked it thoroughly. (Wasted a lot of time by writing/playing with various tools and loads.) Dbench on ext4 ramdisk, hackbench and ebizzy

Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20 > package logcheck logcheck-database logtail Ignoring bugs not assigned to: logcheck-database logtail logcheck > tags 354820 + pending Bug#354820: rules to filter out entries caused by ssh scanners Tags were: patch Tags added: pending > tags 355085 + pending

hi > I don't know if this is related but I also get quite a few of these error messages: > > Jan 31 14:10:46 auth: Warning: auth client 0 disconnected with 1 pending requests: Connection reset by peer my interpretation: a) you have a very very bz network ... the other end cannot respond to incoming requests even if your network is NOT bz, eg, no collision blinking on your

2014-05-14 19:00+0200, Peter Zijlstra: > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 06:51:24PM +0200, Radim Kr?m?? wrote: > > Ok. > > I've seen merit in pvqspinlock even with slightly slower first-waiter, > > so I would have happily sacrificed those horrible branches. > > (I prefer elegant to optimized code, but I can see why we want to be > > strictly better than ticketlock.)

2014-05-14 19:00+0200, Peter Zijlstra: > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 06:51:24PM +0200, Radim Kr?m?? wrote: > > Ok. > > I've seen merit in pvqspinlock even with slightly slower first-waiter, > > so I would have happily sacrificed those horrible branches. > > (I prefer elegant to optimized code, but I can see why we want to be > > strictly better than ticketlock.)

Hi all, I''m using my own OutputFormatter with /bin/spec to catch rspec results. I''m experiencing strange behaviour with pending specs and implementation_backtrace. This is my example_pending implementation in rspactor_formatter.rb: class RSpactorFormatter def example_pending(example, message) spec = SpecObject.new( :name => example.description,

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35 # via tagpending # # logcheck (1.3) unstable; urgency=low # # * Formalise the dropping of violations.d/logcheck. Please see # /usr/share/doc/logcheck-database/NEWS.Debian.gz for more information # (closes: #471072). # * Add Auto-Submitted header to outgoing mails (closes: #489172). # * ignore.d.server/kernel: # -

# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.30 # via tagpending # # logcheck (1.2.65) unstable; urgency=low # # * ignore.d.server/courier: # - update rules to include port information; thanks to Antoine Pardignon # (closes: #446310). # - ignore couriertcpd messages; thanks to Andrew Gallagher # (closes: #451118). # * ignore.d.server/smbd_audit: # -

First of all, please direct me into how better to search existing threads in this mailing list. Ok to my rspec 2.0.1 mocha 0.9.8 issue: given a controller test before do subject.expects(:authenticate).once end it "should bla bla" do pending "PENDING, shouldn''t fail?" end with config.mock_with :rspec it''s ok: pending, but with