Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "pejoratively".
2008 Oct 29
3
OT - Please don't feed the Troll(s)
Folks,
I fully understand the emotional need to respond to one who throws
around terms like "Communist", "Tyrannical", etc. even if ostensibly
framed as a rhetorical question. Certain terms and phrases are by nature
pejorative and I;m sure the OP knew this when he entered his post.
My feeling was the OP is either an ignorant, unappreciative,
self-centered, and emotionally
2006 Apr 08
76
MIT vs GPL vs LGPL for open source project
I intend to release a project I wrote with Rails.
What is the right licensing scheme for a web application (content
managing system) which could grow with plugins and add-ons ?
Personally, I would prefer the GPL but does that mean any add-on to the
CMS (like task management) will have to be GPL ?
If some people contribute to the code could it still be double-licenced
so that the people who
2007 Aug 31
2
Microsoft RTAudio
...made an error
in injecting political rhetoric into his answer
to Thomas Leigh. And, yes, that's Business 101. I
now choose to probably not use the product
because I choose not to support anti free market thinking.
* Free Market is not an American Capitalist
"buzz word" as you pejoratively and dismissively
put it. It is, in fact, the essential
characteristic of a very good system called Capitalism.
* You note that Xiph.Org Foundation is a
non-profit organization presumably to elevate its
agenda to some worldly wonderful purpose ... as
if to say "our work is so profoundl...
2005 Nov 07
0
Reducing the deleterious effects of ego related issues onthe list: growing up individually.
This sounds like a necessary sanity check for raising teen-agers.
Brian Brunner
brian.t.brunner at gai-tronics.com
(610)796-5838
Brian Brunner
brian.t.brunner at gai-tronics.com
(610)796-5838
>>> BillsCentOS at triad.rr.com 11/07/05 04:23PM >>>
Folks,
If the reward is nothing more than the egotistical satisfaction of
telling that SOB where to get off
let the damn issue
2005 Apr 05
1
Secunia / Firefox Javascript "Arbitrary Memory Exposure" test
I just confirmed the following bug on my firefox.
http://secunia.com/advisories/14820/
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050219 Firefox/1.0
(I think my firefox is a month or two behind, from ports, but the
advisary indicates both 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 are effected.)
FreeBSD localhost 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Fri Nov 5 04:19:18 UTC 2004
2015 Aug 17
1
Clunky Xorg with latest 6.7 upgrade?
What video card are you using? Xorg driver or proprietary binary thing?
The next thing I'd do is boot the last kernel under which you saw
"normal" performance. If booting the older kernel doesn't fix the
problem, then the problem is probably the X11 server. At that point,
I'd start using "yum downgrade" to revert individual components, and
reboot until you
2007 Aug 31
0
Microsoft RTAudio
...call him his proper name "Jean-Marc" rather than
"Jean".
> I now choose to probably not use the product
> because I choose not to support anti free market thinking.
Choice is good.
> * Free Market is not an American Capitalist
> "buzz word" as you pejoratively and dismissively
> put it. It is, in fact, the essential
> characteristic of a very good system called Capitalism.
I agreed, IMO capitalism has its flaws but as a socio-
economic system it provides a better quality of life and
more opportunity than any other socio-economic system we
huma...
2004 Sep 10
2
loading Sjava
I'm excited about SJava, and I'ld love to get it working, but can't get
past loading the package.
.First.lib fails on this statement:
> library.dynam("SJava", "SJava", "C:/PROGRA~1/R/rw1091/library")
Error in dyn.load(x, as.logical(local), as.logical(now)) :
unable to load shared library
2007 Aug 31
4
Microsoft RTAudio
Hello Jean:
Big mistake!!
One of the three things that a supplier should never discuss is
politics ... that's business 101.
Speex may be a very good product, but we will never use it because of
the politics that you espouse ... some of us out here believe
strongly in the free market. And we also know that monopolies can't
exist because entrepreneurs will always exploit the
2008 May 13
3
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM
Owen Anderson wrote:
> There's nothing particularly stopping you from having your
> installation package include copies of gas and ld,
I disagree. gas and ld are not available on Windoze, except
via MinGW. Yes I can make or tell my customers to install
MinGW, but if MinGW is installed, then I don't need LLVM.
(More about this further ahead)
> You're welcome to think
2009 Feb 05
3
The Origins of R AND CALCULUS
An amusing afterthought : What is a rival software (ahem!) was planting
this, hoping for a divide between S and R communities.or at the very minimum
hoping for some amusement. an assumption or even a pretense of stealing
credit is one of the easiest ways of sparking intellectual discord
Most users of softwares don't really care about who gets credit ( Who wrote
Windows Vista ,or Mac OS or
2005 Nov 07
2
Reducing the deleterious effects of ego related issues on the list: growing up individually.
Folks,
I *suggest* that little or no reply to this is warranted. It's just the
statements of an old fart trying to make a (slightly) better environment
for all of us. These thoughts are offered for consideration and use as
you see fit. For some, "Hey, that'll work for me too" is the hoped for
result. No discussion is intended or warranted, IMO.
If you recognize yourself in
2018 Jul 27
0
Fads, the Lad of the Lake... Hashemesh is still Hemera... and "Greetings Turmeric"
"/if you will share your wine.../" -Dave J. Matthews
*A LONG LONG TIME AGO
<http://hoyo.cf/lists/lt.php?id=YUgNBwNXGAFQVR1QWlQKVF0F>
**,* I /wrote a little story
<http://hoyo.cf/lists/lt.php?id=YUgNAwFQGAFQVR1QWlQKVF0F>
/ about searching through o
<http://hoyo.cf/lists/lt.php?id=YUgNAwFQGAFQVR1QWlQKVF0F>
ur history, looking for the actual beginning of civilization. I
2008 May 13
9
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM
Jon Harrop wrote:
> Can you explain why you would like to generate DLLs on the
> customer's computer rather than using LLVM as a JIT
> compiler?
Customers/clients unhappy with the inefficiency, extra CPU
and RAM usage, and performance penalty of JIT. They require
a faster, more efficient solution. The solution is to fully
compile programs to native code at the time of