search for: peeve

...uot;) gives me three bars. The best I've been able to do is do something like print(hist((wexp), breaks=25, main="Simulation")) This gives me something close to what I want, but seems like a silly way to do it. I'm about to give up and have someone do it in Excel (which peeves me to no end). To further complicate matters, one data set has no items in the zero cell. I'd like that graph to look like the others (using my stupid hack above it has bars that are a different width). Thanks. -- Jay Pfaffman pfaffman at relaxpc.com +1-415-821-7...

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> CC: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> CC: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> --- I was slightly peeved at looking this up and discovering that it was wrong, but the history shows I have only myself to blame. --- docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown b/docs/misc/xen-command-line.markdown in...

I want to make a for loop that concats strings onto a variable: html .= var1 + "this is a test" + whatever What is the syntax that does this in ruby/rails? Also, is there a ''print'' method in ruby? Because when I try to use render_text it will only let me use this once. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Sampo Syreeni wrote: > Secondly, I'd like to see the channel map fleshed out in more detail. Sampo, I did flesh out the wiki a **little** more. Is the intent clearer now? > (Beware of the pet peeve...) What is that pet peeve? > IMO the mapping should cover at least the > channel assignments possible in WAVE files, the most common Ambisonic > ones, and perhaps some added channel interpretations like "surround" > which are commonly used but lacking in most file format...

On 11/22/2016 3:50 PM, Dr. Mikeal Hughes wrote: > When you go to the Dell Linux site and choose shop now you are taken to a page featuring Windows 10 machines. [OT rant] a pet peeve... webpile redesigns that mess everything up. I was looking for info on the BLM (Bureau of Land Management) website last night, and they'd totally redone the entire mess, it was all slick and web 3.0-ish, and full of glowing PR material, and ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ON THE THOUSANDS OF LOCATION...

...by some extra clever anti virus software. Look, let's not try to hack around this. Let's just admit it. There is a virus inside of a virus scanner's test suite. That's OK. This test suite is not required to hack on Clang or LLVM, so I think its fine as is. If people are seriously peeved, we could split the test suite in two, but honestly this is the first time it has ever come up, so I suspect the cost of dealing with this file is lower than the cost of dealing with this email thread. ;] -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://li...

For what it's worth, the Windows installers for other programming language runtimes often install outside of Program Files, so at least there is 'prior art' to motivate having R install directly into the root of the home drive: - ActiveState Perl installs directly C:/Perl; - Python installs (when installing for all users) into C:/Python$VERSION; - The Ruby installers at

...of this against either > > plainv5.2-rc5 or v5.2-rc5 merged with hmm.git and I'll sort it out. > > Just make sure that when you backmerge v5.2-rc5 you have a clear > reason in the merge commit message about why you needed to do it. > While needless rebasing is top of the pet peeve list, second place, as > I found out, is mystery merges without explanations. Yes, I always describe the merge commits. Linus also particular about having *good reasons* for merges. This is why I can't fix the hmm.git to have rc5 until I have patches to apply.. Probbaly I will just put CH...

...If CentOS is built with the exact same sources as RHEL, why not keep the numbering scheme the same? That would make life easier for people like me who build CentOS RPMs from tarballs/SRPMS that run on RHEL and having to look up version numbers is just idiotic. I mean, that's a Microsoft pet peeve of mine. This is also why I don't deploy CentOS as much as I would like. I'd hoped the merger/acquisition/partnership with RH would eliminate some of that, instead it seems to be regressing. I don't get it. On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:48 AM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net>...

One can also do the 'yum-cron' dance to automate updates. Good writeup and description here: https://www.howtoforge.com/tutorial/how-to-setup-automatic-security-updates-on-centos-7/ On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 11:37 PM Rob Kampen <rkampen at kampensonline.com> wrote: > On 16/02/19 6:59 PM, Ralf Prengel wrote: > > Hallo, > > as a beginner using centos I?ve a question

...en NT1 in my outputs. > - Is there a list of which Global parameters are valid in Share sections? Not that i know of. > - Are any Share labelled parameters valid in the Global section? That i dont know, but i do try these things out when needed. Some work some not. > And just a pet peeve which I mentioned years ago - the parameter > synonyms should be deprecated, too many times users use both, plus it > would assist in the readable and support of the smb.conf file. Yes, good point, cleanup more is good. Well, i was thinking the same as you did, but few days ago, Rowland not...

I made a few updates to OggPCM2 http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/OggPCM2 reflecting the latest discussions. Could everyone have a look at it and see if they agree. Otherwise, what do you feel should be changed? Anyone wants to speak in support of chunked PCM? For all those that are just tired of this mess like me, please express yourself in the new spec I created: OggPCM3

...nown primary interpretations (say, channel maps with angle-elevation specified sources) can be added without compromising compatibility (they will simply be skipped whereas in the current format they would cause na?ve decoders to reject the file). How does it sound? >> (Beware of the pet peeve...) > > What is that pet peeve? Umm... Roughly file formats which prove rigid in practice even after they've been declared extensible. > I haven't enumerated them all, but we should be able to without too > much trouble, Want me to start a list in the Wiki? > Do you have...

...nced search and filtering functionality (with ranges and substring searches for each attribute). Despite being a pretty common use case, this isn''t supported particularly well by any framework I''ve used, including Rails. I''d like to fix that. :) Right now, my major pet peeves are: 1. Long, ugly, repetitive methods that check each criterion for nil/empty and then append to arrays of join tables, conditions and condition variables. 2. Unsettling mix of model and controller responsibility when constructing Paginators 3. Reduced form helper support for form elements tha...

Hi, Yes, I'm back with this pet peeve of mine again. Most of the old cover letter at https://gist.github.com/wferi/6989458 still applies; I'd like to reiterate its last paragraph here, too: > And an official stat() implementation would be very useful. After > inventing mine, I noticed rosh also invented its own... Anyway,...

...8 hours of my time researching this issue and trying to get it to work myself. Every ATI driver release I get my hopes up again but for nothing. I would just like some kind of response. I'm sick and tired of people saying things like "It's those ATI drivers" or my personal pet Peeve "you should get Windows". I'm not a noob at this either. I have taken a full semester course in Unix using Linux, as well as using Linux full-time at home on Four PC's with multiple distro's for over 2 years. I'd just like some assurance that something will be done abo...

...s > been shown to significantly (hand wavy...) improve the runtime > performance. > > <troll> > With the current trend, the Polly developers don't have to worry > about improving their compile time, we'll catch up with them ;) > </troll> My two largest pet peeves in this area are: 1. We often use functions from ValueTracking (to get known bits, the number of sign bits, etc.) as through they're low cost. They're not really low cost. The problem is that they *should* be. These functions do bottom-up walks, and could cache their results. Instead, th...

...to ship an app built with gcc-4.5+? Their code needs to use the OS unwinder. So it seems to me you should be testing the compiler against the OS unwinder - not against the just built unwinder. Has something changed in the FSF unwinder that clients of gcc will want? -Nick P.S. One minor pet peeve of mine is that the exception handling is well layered (e.g. _cxa_* layer on top the _Unwind_* layer (which on darwin is now built upon the libunwind layer)). Except for one glaring problem. The compiler mostly emits calls to _cxa_* functions, but it makes one call to _Unwind_Resume. Ah...

On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:28:15AM -0700, Nick Kledzik wrote: > So, when these test cases are run, is the binary linked against /usr/ > lib/libgcc_s.10.5.dylib? or against some just built libgcc_s.10.5.dylib? > or against some just build libgcc_s.dylib? If either of the latter, then > if you changed the FSF build of libgcc_s for darwin to have the right > magic symbols, then

Hi, I've two yocto questions about the syntax of dialplan: 1. What's the "official" notation of each line: "=>" or "=" ? In the wiki of Asterisk, I see very often "=>", however, what's the reason for both syntaxes authorized ? Historical ? 2. To write info in logs/console, you have two commands: NoOp and Verbose. Verbose seems to be