search for: peelers

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 39 matches for "peelers".

Did you mean: feelers
2005 May 20
2
Experimental Bitrate peeler
Hi All, As specified in earlier email we have released the trial version of the ogg vorbis decoder. Along with the decoder we have released an experimental version of the bitrate peeler that we have used to test the decoder for bitrate peeled inputs. We have made the executable of the bitrate peeler available from our website downloads section. www.vinjey.com/ogg_downloads.html
2003 Mar 31
5
Rhubarber (advanced peeler)
Hi all, [For the uninitiated: a "peeler" is a program that transforms a Vorbis stream into a smaller, (somewhat) lower quality Vorbis stream, and does so quickly, by just throwing out some data.] After having prototyped several peelers that aim to peel to a certain filesize, or to a certain quality, with mixed success, I've now taken a different route: a peeler that aims for the best speed/quality tradeoff. It proved to be easier to realize. Without further ado, find attached the source tarball for "Rhubarber", as...
2003 Mar 31
5
Rhubarber (advanced peeler)
Hi all, [For the uninitiated: a "peeler" is a program that transforms a Vorbis stream into a smaller, (somewhat) lower quality Vorbis stream, and does so quickly, by just throwing out some data.] After having prototyped several peelers that aim to peel to a certain filesize, or to a certain quality, with mixed success, I've now taken a different route: a peeler that aims for the best speed/quality tradeoff. It proved to be easier to realize. Without further ado, find attached the source tarball for "Rhubarber", as...
2004 Jun 16
3
working non-peeler
Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://westfish.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis/attachments/20040616/9a2bfd8d/attachment.pgp
2006 Oct 11
1
smbclient sending output to stdout
I'm using smbclient 3.0.22-13.16-SUSE-SLES10. I'm using the smbclientparser Perl module to use smbclient from within my Perl scripts. Whenever I perform a GET on a file, smb outputs this line to stdout: Domain=[mydomain] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] This results in hundreds of mail messages in my local mail queue. How can I turn this off, so that smbclient
2006 Jun 23
3
NT_STATUS_SHARING_VIOLATION when trying to delete files
I searched the archives already and couldn't find an answer to this. I'm running an automated process via a cron job on a SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 9 box. The cron runs a Perl script, which uses the SmbClientParser module. The Perl script grabs files from clients running Windows 2000. The files on the client computers are created by in-house MFC applications on those computers.
2002 Nov 01
10
fitting lots of music into 10GB with Vorbis
Hi- just wondering, what would be the best quality rating to use to fit lots of music into 10GB of HD space. The audio quality has to be high enough for it to sound good when played through PA systems (for when my college is stupid enough to forget to hire a DJ, or when the realise the DJ they always hire can't use a mixing desk properly) ranging from a functional PA system thats stuck in the
2003 Mar 31
0
Ogg Traffic for March 31, 2003
Hi Everybody: Below is this week's Ogg Traffic in plain text. The HTML version is available at http://www.vorbis.com/ot/20030331.html Enjoy! Ogg Traffic for Monday, March 31, 2003 [1]Carsten "Purple" Haese March 31, 2003 _________________________________________________________________ Table of Contents 1. Status Updates 1.1. Monty 1.2. Michael
2006 Jan 17
1
What the heck? A Vorbis scam?
Just today I received a weird e-mail that contained a worm (WORM_GREW.A) attached to it. From : Vinoth Kumar <vinoth@vinjey.com> Sent : Tuesday, January 17, 2006 6:29 PM To : <ivo_mmm@hotmail.com> Subject : Fw: Funny :) Attachment : Attachments001.BHX (0.13 MB) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from vinoth ([59.144.59.103]) by bay0-mc4-f5.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft
2004 Aug 06
14
brainfart #67453 - hyper-index
I don''t know if this has been suggested before but.. What about adding support for a bookmark or hyperlinked index? The idea is that a large compilation such as a long speech or an album would be maintained as a single file, but on playback, the player would show numerous ''tracks'' which are really just bookmarks relating to starting position of the specific part or
2003 Nov 17
1
Ogg Vorbis v1.1 suggestion
My wish for 1.1 is to stream my station with VBR at bitrates averaging 28-32kb/s with a minimum 32khz sample rate. Hopefully this will be achievable with the new low bitrate tuning that is planned. This could put it on a par with Real Audio at 32kb/s. Currently a quality of -1, 32khz sample rate produces an average around 34-38kb/s which is too high for modems. I could currently use a managed
2003 Apr 08
6
bitpeeler
No offense, Segher, but the output quality of this thing is awful. =) I'll disregard the fact that, at least with *my* compiler, the source tarball I downloaded reduces every packet to zero bytes, which isn't terribly interesting. I decided to set the byte reduction to something constant: I started by dividing each packet's size by 2 just to see what would happen. The resulting ogg
2009 Oct 26
0
AST-2009-007: ACL not respected on SIP INVITE
Asterisk Project Security Advisory - AST-2009-007 +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Product | Asterisk | |--------------------+---------------------------------------------------| | Summary | ACL not respected on SIP INVITE |
2002 Dec 28
1
Transcoding between Vorbis and Vorbis
I know transcoding is a bad thing. However, i am in the need of being able to lower the quality of an ogg file without the original CD. Whats the best way to do it (least generational loss possible) - "ogg > ogg" or "ogg > wav > ogg" or is there an easier way (as in has someone got a decent working peeler up there sleeve and isn't telling anyone about it)
2003 Jun 22
2
Bit Rate Peeling Quality
Hi All, Let me ask this question of the group: When bit rate peeling becomes available, how will the quality of the peeled Vorbis file compare to a file encoded at the target quality directly from the original? So, for: a.wav --> b.ogg (at q6) --> c.ogg (at q2) a.wav --------------------> d.ogg (at q2) how are c.ogg and d.ogg likely to compare in terms of audio
2005 May 20
1
Ogg vorbis decoder - Independent implementation questions
Hi All, Ours is an embedded software solutions company that focuses on developing embedded software solutions specific to the DSP market. I'm happy to inform the ogg vorbis developer community that today we have release trial version of our Ogg vorbis decoder made available on PC, TMS320C67x platform (More platforms to follow). More information about the same can be fetched from
2005 Jan 07
2
Changing the bitrate (down) of an ogg file
Hi. Sorry if this is the wrong list - a pointer to the right would be appreciated. I have a number of Ogg files, that have a VBR bitrate of approx. 256 kbps. I have bought a portabel Ogg player (iRiver iFP 795) that unfortunately only support bitrates up to approx. 225 kbps. So my question is, if there is a tool to change the bitrate down to e.g. 220 kbps. I know I can do this with sox, or
2002 Jun 23
1
peeling as I understand it (was Re: When will quality increase be unnoticable?)
>> Is bit-peeling going to be real (or just a rumor forever)? > Apparently the RC3 streams are capable of being bit peeled, however the > tool to do so was looking likely to be quite complex. I believe the plan > was to have RC4 produce streams that left better hints for the peeling > tool, so as to make the tool simpler and faster, but I doubt we'll see it > until
2002 Dec 04
3
Technical MP3->OGG transcoding question
Hi guys. Let me put this first: I've read every past thread about mp3 -> ogg transcoding and I agree to the fact that it is BAD--for several reasons indeed. This post is just a technical question, which I hope someone who knows stuff better than I do will answer me. Another disclaimer: although I'm a programmer, I've never worked with anything audio-related, nor do I know
2002 Dec 21
4
had a thought on peeling last night
I was up late last night, and i had a thought on peeling that would probably provide 100% accurate peeling data to a decoder, but take a maximum of 1101 times normal time to encode (taking into account the range from q-1 to q10 ). ay you want to encode a track at q10, but you want it to be peelable. the 1101 encoder would encode from the source at every quantifiable level (since there are 2