search for: peeler

Hi All, As specified in earlier email we have released the trial version of the ogg vorbis decoder. Along with the decoder we have released an experimental version of the bitrate peeler that we have used to test the decoder for bitrate peeled inputs. We have made the executable of the bitrate peeler available from our website downloads section. www.vinjey.com/ogg_downloads.html We need inputs with respect to results of this bitrate peeler. This bitrate peeler reduces t...

Hi all, [For the uninitiated: a "peeler" is a program that transforms a Vorbis stream into a smaller, (somewhat) lower quality Vorbis stream, and does so quickly, by just throwing out some data.] After having prototyped several peelers that aim to peel to a certain filesize, or to a certain quality, with mixed success, I've now...

Hi all, [For the uninitiated: a "peeler" is a program that transforms a Vorbis stream into a smaller, (somewhat) lower quality Vorbis stream, and does so quickly, by just throwing out some data.] After having prototyped several peelers that aim to peel to a certain filesize, or to a certain quality, with mixed success, I've now...

Skipped content of type multipart/mixed-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://westfish.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis/attachments/20040616/9a2bfd8d/attachment.pgp

...ile, smb outputs this line to stdout: Domain=[mydomain] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] This results in hundreds of mail messages in my local mail queue. How can I turn this off, so that smbclient doesn't send any output to stdout during execution of my Perl scripts? Wade Peeler

I searched the archives already and couldn't find an answer to this. I'm running an automated process via a cron job on a SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 9 box. The cron runs a Perl script, which uses the SmbClientParser module. The Perl script grabs files from clients running Windows 2000. The files on the client computers are created by in-house MFC applications on those computers.

Hi- just wondering, what would be the best quality rating to use to fit lots of music into 10GB of HD space. The audio quality has to be high enough for it to sound good when played through PA systems (for when my college is stupid enough to forget to hire a DJ, or when the realise the DJ they always hire can't use a mixing desk properly) ranging from a functional PA system thats stuck in the

...s Updates 1.1. Monty 1.2. Michael Smith 1.3. Brendan Cully 1.4. Karl Heyes 1.5. Jean-Marc Valin 2. Recent Developments 2.1. Tremor Improvements 2.2. Nero Ogg Vorbis plugin 2.3. New Software 2.4. New (Experimental) Bitrate Peeler Available [2]Previous Issues of Ogg Traffic 1. Status Updates 1.1. Monty In a flurry of CVS activity, Monty has completed the tedious libogg2-zerocopy rewrite of the memory management for the Ogg framing layer. He then proceeded to deploy the new memory management in Tremor, alon...

...sending worms to people? Not only is it ilegal, imoral, stupid, but they aren't even mentioning what they sell on their e-mail. The MIME header is clear on who sent this though, and even the IP was logged. I then read the FAQ at their site. Apparently their Vorbis encoder supports bitrate peeler (or it's starting to), and offers DSP support and whatever else. It's also available as Trial download (I wonder if I should download that crap and kill my curiosity on how good it is, or NOT). Just for the hell of it, here's me copying and pasting a portion of the FAQ (for fair use...

I don''t know if this has been suggested before but.. What about adding support for a bookmark or hyperlinked index? The idea is that a large compilation such as a long speech or an album would be maintained as a single file, but on playback, the player would show numerous ''tracks'' which are really just bookmarks relating to starting position of the specific part or

My wish for 1.1 is to stream my station with VBR at bitrates averaging 28-32kb/s with a minimum 32khz sample rate. Hopefully this will be achievable with the new low bitrate tuning that is planned. This could put it on a par with Real Audio at 32kb/s. Currently a quality of -1, 32khz sample rate produces an average around 34-38kb/s which is too high for modems. I could currently use a managed

No offense, Segher, but the output quality of this thing is awful. =) I'll disregard the fact that, at least with *my* compiler, the source tarball I downloaded reduces every packet to zero bytes, which isn't terribly interesting. I decided to set the byte reduction to something constant: I started by dividing each packet's size by 2 just to see what would happen. The resulting ogg

...| |--------------------+---------------------------------------------------| | Last Updated On | October 26, 2009 | |--------------------+---------------------------------------------------| | Advisory Contact | Jeff Peeler <jpeeler AT digium DOT com> | |--------------------+---------------------------------------------------| | CVE Name | | +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ +--------------...

...ing. However, i am in the need of being able to lower the quality of an ogg file without the original CD. Whats the best way to do it (least generational loss possible) - "ogg > ogg" or "ogg > wav > ogg" or is there an easier way (as in has someone got a decent working peeler up there sleeve and isn't telling anyone about it) <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe...

Hi All, Let me ask this question of the group: When bit rate peeling becomes available, how will the quality of the peeled Vorbis file compare to a file encoded at the target quality directly from the original? So, for: a.wav --> b.ogg (at q6) --> c.ogg (at q2) a.wav --------------------> d.ogg (at q2) how are c.ogg and d.ogg likely to compare in terms of audio

Hi All, Ours is an embedded software solutions company that focuses on developing embedded software solutions specific to the DSP market. I'm happy to inform the ogg vorbis developer community that today we have release trial version of our Ogg vorbis decoder made available on PC, TMS320C67x platform (More platforms to follow). More information about the same can be fetched from

Hi. Sorry if this is the wrong list - a pointer to the right would be appreciated. I have a number of Ogg files, that have a VBR bitrate of approx. 256 kbps. I have bought a portabel Ogg player (iRiver iFP 795) that unfortunately only support bitrates up to approx. 225 kbps. So my question is, if there is a tool to change the bitrate down to e.g. 220 kbps. I know I can do this with sox, or

...and subsequently "peeled" to q6, it may not sound quite as good as the same file originally encoded at q6. So they'll peel, and the bitrate (and filesize) will be right where you want it, but the quality may be sub-optimal. But this depends probably on how "smart" the peeler is. It is also suspected that post-1.0 files, with their "hints" or whatever the heck is going on, will peel "perfectly". That is, a file encoded at q9 and then later peeled to q6 will be identical* to the same file originally encoded at q6. (* By "identical", I...

Hi guys. Let me put this first: I've read every past thread about mp3 -> ogg transcoding and I agree to the fact that it is BAD--for several reasons indeed. This post is just a technical question, which I hope someone who knows stuff better than I do will answer me. Another disclaimer: although I'm a programmer, I've never worked with anything audio-related, nor do I know

I was up late last night, and i had a thought on peeling that would probably provide 100% accurate peeling data to a decoder, but take a maximum of 1101 times normal time to encode (taking into account the range from q-1 to q10 ). ay you want to encode a track at q10, but you want it to be peelable. the 1101 encoder would encode from the source at every quantifiable level (since there are 2