search for: pedraza

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "pedraza".

Did you mean: epedraza
2020 Jul 12
2
Consulta: Manejo de bases de datos y ejemplos de procesamiento estadístico.
...o; Quiero preguntarles si me pueden brindar algunos ejemplos practicos para iniciar mi estudio estadístico con R. Procesamiento de datos, bases de datos y ejemplos. Agradezco la atención prestada. Saludos. -- ____________________________________________________________________ *Atte:* *Gerardo Pedraza Vega* *Especialista en Estadística* *Economista* *Joven investigador, **Grupo Cadenas de Valor & Competitividad Regional* *Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas* *Universidad del Tolima* *Cel: 316-437-3329* [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2009 Apr 29
3
Re: Wine memory problem
Hi, I understand from this thread that is unavoidable that wine reserve big portion of VM (~3.6 GB). I am using wine on a VPS with Centos 5.2. My problem is that my VPS is charging my by all VM (among other resources) used by my server. In my case running a more or less simple windows application is taking more than 18 GB of VM. This is the top list (part of it):: PID USER PR NI
2004 Dec 08
2
problems with eudora
Hi everyone, i just installed dovecot in Fedora Core release 1 (Yarrow). When accessing from a eudora 6.1 client, first it gave ssl authentication problems. I fixed disabling them in eudora, but now it authenticates ok and then it says that there is no inbox for that user. Any idea? Enrique Pedraza Valiente Formador en Lenguajes Avanzados y Nuevas Tecnolog?as cell: +34 678 51 75 19 http://epedraza.com
2004 Dec 08
0
problems with eudora (2)
ah, dovecot version is dovecot-0.99.12-1.1.fc2.rf. tx Enrique Pedraza Valiente Formador en Lenguajes Avanzados y Nuevas Tecnolog?as cell: +34 678 51 75 19 http://epedraza.com
2009 May 05
2
Re: Wine memory problem
Hi, Finally I managed to build wine (1.1.20) on Centos 5.2 x86_64 and applied patch 20483 (0001-Ported-mmap-patch-to-wine-1.1.19.patch) of bug 13335. But unfortunatelly I get the same performance: each .exe process get 3.6 GB of Virtual memory. Any other suggestion? Thanks, Salva