search for: peddled

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 06:31:13PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > i personally don't care what any soho-equipment manufacturer does or not, so > it's not abut "attitude" - it's simple logic - and maybe the switch to GPLv3 > is the reason for the whole subject "The sad state of samba 4 adaption" Utter bollocks, and I have the OEMs to prove it.

Folks, I was able to get R installed using: apt-get install r-base-core R version 2.14.1 (2011-12-22) Copyright (C) 2011 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN 3-900051-07-0 Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu (32-bit) * What is the best way to upgrade to the latest version of R. * What is the best way to install rJava and XLConnect. Thanks for your time, Best, KW PS. I know some of you

> On Aug 14, 2017, at 12:22 PM, fs <mail at friedrich-schuster.de> wrote: > > Hi, and sorry for asking such an unspecific question. > > Does anybody know of statistical / data mining methods that are available in R > that are not in SAS ? With SAS I mean the SAS System Version 9.4 and SAS > Enterprise Miner. I don't expect a complete list, just two or three

Hi, and sorry for asking such an unspecific question. Does anybody know of statistical / data mining methods that are available in R that are not in SAS ? With SAS I mean the SAS System Version 9.4 and SAS Enterprise Miner. I don't expect a complete list, just two or three examples or hints where and what to look for. I found some older comparisons, and the R methods mentioned there

Hello, what is the best way to implement email notification on missed call ? So far, I have been using a solution that I hacked together. I create a hangup-handler, inside which I check for "${DIALSTATUS}" and use System(): System(/bin/echo ... | /usr/bin/mail ....) I have pasted the block here, for better formating: https://pastebin.com/Sf8raPD6 My question is: Do I have to

Hey All, I''ve just got back from a great meeting with a potential new client. Everything was going so well - I knocked back their old-school project plans, sold Rails to them in less than 5 minutes. All cool. Then, 5 minutes before the end they say ''Oh and by the way - I know we said we''re happy to host on any platform suitable, but there''s been a change and

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 06:15:30PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 12.03.2016 um 18:08 schrieb Sketch: > >On Sat, 12 Mar 2016, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > > >>GPLv3 should guarentee that you can replace the Samba > >>on *any* device. That's the whole point of GPLv3 - no > >>DRM. > >> > >>If you find a Samba device using any

> what should it do with the non local messages or local messages directly > at aliases? OK, so I gather that the Submission Server cannot do that (yet). My suggestion for a future version would then be: How about running dovecot-lda, if the user happens to be local, or a local alias? Or at least provide some sort of pattern matching: anything matching *@example.com , pass the message to

Hi, [First, a quick introduction... I''m one of the sysadmins at Koumbit.org, and we''re evaluating puppet for managing our modest server farm. I''ve already started writing recipes and manifests and intend to share those with this community. Part of my time worked on this will be directly paid by Koumbit.] So we''ve got a few half-finished puppet modules here:

What unmitigated bullshit. Your attempt at logic is laughable. You hold up threadbare stereotypes as the norm, when in reality they are little more than characters straight out of Central Casting. The "genius hermit who can't associate with people" is dumb and false. It's meant to excuse behavior that is unacceptable, when in reality a person who cannot interact with people is

Hello everyone. Please keep discussion civil and productive. I’d suggest moving general discussions of social behavior and norms off the llvm-dev list. These discussions are generally quite off topic and draw more heat than light. I’d prefer it if we all just move on. I obviously do not know who “unnamed poster” is, but I am also specifically concerned about people who are not LLVM