search for: pedantri

On Mon, 6 May 2019 at 10:13, James Courtier-Dutton via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Although the above is mentioning bytes, looking at the "/ 8" and "& 0x7" makes it look like the author meant octets and not bytes. > Bytes can be any size of bits. I don't think you'll have much luck trying to make that stick for a general audience,

Hi, There is a small typo in src/lib/network.c line 624 return "A non-recovable name server error occurred"; should be return "A non-recoverable name server error occurred"; Sorry about the pedantry. BTW, I am getting this error whenever I am trying to resolve a name from inside dovecot, but I can using the system tools. I am trying to get the proxying code to

does anyone here have pointers or access to courseware that could be used to teach centos (5.4, i believe)? publicly-available, free C/W would, of course, be ideal, but if you have some decent training manuals that you're willing to license on a per-manual basis, i'm still willing to chat. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day

a couple folks on the local mailing list were asking about the mechanics of building a kernel for a centos system, and they seemed to suggest that there were some intricacies involved as opposed to other distros. i've never tried it -- is there a trick or something? got a pointer to the canonical web page that has the directions? thanks. rday --

it's been a while since i've played with filesystem encryption so, on centos 5.4 (and other linux distros), is dm-crypt/LUKS considered to be the state of the art WRT encryption? i remember other solutions like loop-aes and others, but what's considered the gold standard these days? rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day

On 4/29/20 4:12 PM, Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:58 PM Ejjeh, Adel via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Specifically, I want to be able to know when a called function does not >> have any side effects (e.g. math library functions like sqrt) >> > > Apologies for the pedantry, but I believe sqrt may

ok, given the flurry of responses to my original post, let me see if i have a handle on this as i think i've finally figured it out and, yes, it does make sense. the scenario is that there is a very large software company in the area whose only officially supported linux platform is currently suse. however, they are getting increasing call to have their product run on red hat. for most

at the risk of picking at that scab a bit longer, i'm going to toss out a comment regarding people still waiting for the public availability of centos 5.4. here: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/083743.html we read: "The last status (from twitter) is 2 days old with the '5.4 is baked! centos internal network will start syncing up today. Release ~ soon!'.

Hi All I am writing a pass which requires checking dependences, and am having trouble dealing with function calls. Specifically, I want to be able to know when a called function does not have any side effects (e.g. math library functions like sqrt), and was wondering if there are attributes that specify this behavior (I know there is the ‘noread’ attribute but wasn’t sure if there’s something

someone just pointed out to me that there is a distro called "oracle enterprise linux" which is effectively a re-branded RHEL, so i'm curious -- has anyone here used both centos and OEL and would there be any differences that would be worth caring about? the only thing i can think of that might be worthwhile is that OEL might change some of the default kernel parms thru

On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 15:56 -0700, Philip Reames via llvm-dev wrote: > > > On 5/6/19 2:43 AM, Tim Northover via llvm-dev wrote: > > On Mon, 6 May 2019 at 10:13, James Courtier-Dutton via llvm-dev > > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > Although the above is mentioning bytes, looking at the "/ > > > 8" and "& 0x7" makes

i'm reading the lowdown on 3rd party repos with respect to centos here: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories and i have a couple questions and observations. first, the entry for centosplus reads: "Popular packages from this repository include: postfix with database support, a rebuilt kernel with additional drivers & filesystem support, php5 and mysql5."

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Nov 12, 2009, at 7:35 PM, Talin wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com >> <mailto:clattner at apple.com>> wrote: >> >> >> There is also the issue of how constants should be represented. >> >> For all current processors that I know of, an intptr will be either >> 32 or

i may be in the position of recommending that a sizable client take a look at centos as a supported platform in the near future, but if one goes to the "Support" -> "Commercial Support" page, it reads: This Section or Page is coming soon. that is *not* going to give this client any warm fuzzies. from a promotion perspective, either that page should get some actual

it's all about the open source, baby. http://candyandaspirin.blogspot.com/2009/09/next-adventure-in-ecm-begins.html DISCLAIMER: the lady in question is a good friend of mine. but don't let that scare you off. :-) rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux

no, no, just kidding, but this is interesting: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10376762-16.html rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca

what is the proper approach to install on centos 5.4 a package that's newer than the currently supported one? at the moment, AFAICT, the latest "poppler-utils" package for centos is 0.5.4. however, the source is up to version 0.12: http://poppler.freedesktop.org/ which matches the current fedora version, but that's not surprising since, naturally, fedora zips right along

i zipped over to centos.org to check out the 5.4 manuals, and what i found was: http://www.centos.org/docs/5/ which stops at 5.2. now, i don't really see this as a problem since i can always get what i need here: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/ i'm just curious as to whether centos is just not bothering to rebrand the manuals since it's just as easy to get that info

i was looking at options for backing up mysql databases across the net, and ran across this: http://www.zmanda.com/download-zrm.php clearly, there are two rpms for linux: * MySQL-zrm-2.2.0-1.noarch.rpm * MySQL-zrm-client-2.2.0-1.noarch.rpm but on a centos 5.4 system, if i do # yum search zrm i see only "MySQL-zrm.noarch". anyone know why the centos repo would only know about

being used to mysql 5.1 on my fedora system, i'm suddenly looking after a centos 5.4 box with mysql 5.0.77. before i start digging into the mysql 5.0-5.1 changelog, do i have a lot to worry about in terms of mentally backing up one version? or is simply upgrading the centos box to mysql 5.1 an option? (i realize that mysql 5.1 is *not* officially supported in centos 5.4.) rday --