Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "pect".
Did you mean:
pecl
2015 Apr 08
1
Icecast 2.4.2 - security release
...nown issues (as in 2.4.1)
* status-json.xsl format differs if one source client is
connected and if more than one client is connected.
Workaround: e.g. connect dummy source(s).
* HTTP PUT implementation currently doesn?t support
chunked encoding yet.
* HTTP PUT with ?Expect: 100-Continue? receives first a ?100? and
soon after a ?200?, instead of the ?200? at end of transmission.
* Caution should be exercised when using <on-connect> or
<on-disconnect>, as there is a small chance of stream file
descriptors being mixed up with script fil...
2015 Apr 08
1
Icecast 2.4.2 - security release
...nown issues (as in 2.4.1)
* status-json.xsl format differs if one source client is
connected and if more than one client is connected.
Workaround: e.g. connect dummy source(s).
* HTTP PUT implementation currently doesn?t support
chunked encoding yet.
* HTTP PUT with ?Expect: 100-Continue? receives first a ?100? and
soon after a ?200?, instead of the ?200? at end of transmission.
* Caution should be exercised when using <on-connect> or
<on-disconnect>, as there is a small chance of stream file
descriptors being mixed up with script fil...
2019 Mar 09
2
[Bug 13827] New: despite --copy-unsafe-links, rsync does not copy the referent of symlinks that point one level outside the copied tree
....04.1 LTS
2)
rsync version 3.1.2, protocol version 31
(The most current version of rsync is 3.1.3. But its release notes do not
mention this bug to be fixed.)
The change & release notes of Lubuntu 18.04.1 do not mention rsync.
The bug tracker Ubuntu Launchpad does not mention this bug.
3)
I expected any symlink pointing outside the copied tree to be converted into a
copy, when I use --copy-unsafe-links.
4)
A symlink pointing just one level outside the copied tree is not converted.
This is always reproducible, see the demo script attached.
I submitted this bug to Ubuntu Launchpad first. But...
2007 Mar 12
10
using mocha with rspec
Hi folks.
I''ve just started using rspec and I have to say it''s very nice. The
thing is, I prefer mocha''s mocking dialect. So I thought a simple
require ''mocha'' would set me up.
Unfortunately, rspec does all its goodness using do/end blocks in
anonymous classes, so it wasn''t quite that obvious.
Anyway, here is the incantation I ended up