search for: pearsonchisq

Is there any reason that rstandard.glm doesn't have a "pearson" option? And if not, can it be added? Background: I'm currently teaching an undergrad/grad-service course from Agresti's "Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis (2nd edn)" and deviance residuals are not used in the text. For now I'll just provide the students with a simple function to use, but I

...was teaching a course based on Agresti & Franklin: > "Statistics, The Art and Science of Learning from Data", when I realized > that R was missing standardized residuals. > > >> It would also be nice for teaching purposes if glm or summary.glm had a >> "pearsonchisq" component and a corresponding extractor function, but I >> can imagine that there might be arguments against it that haven't >> occured to me. Plus, I doubt that anyone wants to touch glm unless >> it's to repair a bug. If I'm wrong about all that though, ......